Abstract
Disregarding the identity, the remaining 63 elements of the generalized three-qubit Pauli group are found to contain 12096 distinct copies of Mermin’s magic pentagram. Remarkably, 12096 is also the number of automorphisms of the smallest split Cayley hexagon. We give a few solid arguments showing that this may not be a mere coincidence. These arguments are mainly tied to the structure of certain types of geometric hyperplanes of the hexagon. It is further demonstrated that also an \((18_{2}, 12_{3})\)-type of magic configurations, recently proposed by Waegell and Aravind (J Phys A Math Theor 45:405301, 2012), seems to be intricately linked with automorphisms of the hexagon. Finally, the entanglement properties exhibited by edges of both pentagrams and these particular Waegell–Aravind configurations are addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It is obvious that the product of the three operators located on a line of the \(10_3\)-configuration is not equal to \(\pm I\).
References
Liang, Y.C., Spekkens, R.W., Wiseman, H.M.: Specker’s parable of the overprotective seer: a road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity. Phys. Rep. 506, 1–39 (2011)
Greenberger, D.M., Horne, M.A., Zeilinger, A.: Going beyond Bell’s theorem, in Bell’s theorem. In: Kafatos, M. (ed.) Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 73–76 (1989)
Kochen, S., Specker, E.P.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)
Bengtsson, I.: Gleason, Kochen–Specker, and a competition that never was. Preprint 1210.0436 [quant-ph] (2012)
Mermin, N.D.: Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803–815 (1993)
Planat, M.: On small proofs of the Bell–Kochen–Specker theorem for two, three and four qubits. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127, 86 (2012)
Arkhipov, A.: Extending and characterizing quantum magic games. Preprint 1209.3819 [quant-ph] (2012)
Ruuge, A.R., van Oystaeyen, F.: Saturated Kochen–Specker type configuration of $120$ projective lines in eight-dimensional space and its group of symmetry. J. Math. Phys. 46, 052109 (2005)
Saniga, M., Planat, M., Pracna, P., Lévay P.: ‘Magic’ configurations of three-qubit observables and geometric hyperplanes of the smallest split Cayley hexagon. SIGMA 8, 083 (2012)
Polster, B., Schroth, A.E., van Maldeghem, H.: Generalized flatland. Math. Intell. 23, 33–47 (2001)
Schroth, A.E.: How to draw a hexagon. Discret. Math. 199, 161–171 (1999)
Waegell, M., Aravind, P.K.: Proofs of the Kochen–Specker theorem based on a system of three qubits. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 45, 405301 (2012)
Gropp, H.: Configurations and their realization. Discret. Math. 174, 137–151 (1997)
Bekius, F.: The Shannon capacity of a graph. Bachelor thesis (Amsterdam, available at http://www.science.uva.nl/onderwijs/thesis/centraal/files/f1876615413.pdf) (2011)
Saniga, M., Planat, M.: Multiple qubits as symplectic polar spaces of order two. Adv. Stud. Theor. Phys. 1, 1–4 (2007)
Planat, M.: Pauli graphs when the Hilbert space dimension contains a square: why the Dedekind psi function? J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 44, 045301 (2011)
Coolsaet, K.: The smallest split Cayley hexagon has two symplectic embeddings. Finite Fields Appl. 16, 380–384 (2010)
Lévay, P., Saniga, M., Vrana, P.: Three-qubit operators, the split Cayley hexagon of order two, and black holes. Phys. Rev. D 78, 124022 (2008)
Ronan, M.A.: Embeddings and hyperplanes of discrete geometries. Eur. J. Comb. 8, 179–185 (1987)
Frohard, D., Johnson, P.M.: Geometric hyperplanes in generalized hexagons of order (2,2). Commun. Algebra 22, 773–797 (1994)
Saniga, M., Lévay, P.: Mermin’s pentagram as an ovoid of $PG(3,2)$. Europhys. Lett. EPL 97, 50006 (2012)
Coffman, V., Kundu, J., Wootters, W.K.: Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. 61, 052306 (2000)
Holweck, F., Luque, J.G., Thibon, J.Y.: Geometric descriptions of entangled states by auxiliary varieties. J. Math. Phys. 53, 102203 (2012)
Lawrence, J.: Entanglement patterns in mutually unbiased basis sets. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022338 (2011)
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the VEGA grant agency projects 2/0098/10 and 2/0003/13. We thank Dr. P. Vrana for enlightening correspondence concerning a skew symplectic embedding of the split Cayley hexagon and Dr. P. Pracna for providing us with the electronic versions of the figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
We shall show here why no edge of either a pentagram or a WA-configuration can feature a \(W\)-type of entanglement. In fact, we have the more general following statement:
Assume that \(u_1\) and \(u_2\) are two commuting operators of the generalized three-qubit Pauli group and let \(v\) be a common eigenvector, then \(v\) is either non-entangled, partially entangled or exhibits entanglement of a GHZ-type.
The proof can be carried out in two steps:
Operators involving the identity at least once
Let \(u=U_1U_2U_3\) be an element of the generalized Pauli group where \(U_i\in \{I, X, Y,Z\}\) and not all the three entries are simultaneously equal to the identity. There are \(36\) elements with at least one of the \(U_i\) being equal to \(I\). Assume \(U_1=I\) and denote by \(E_u ^\lambda \) the eigenspace of the operator \(u\) for the eigenvalue \(\lambda \). Then the space of three qubits decomposes as \(E_u^1\oplus E_u^{-1}\) and bases of the eigenspaces are given by :
\(E_u^1\) | \(E_u^{-1}\) |
---|---|
\(|000\rangle +|0U_2(|0\rangle )U_3(|0\rangle )\rangle \) | \(|000\rangle -|0U_2(|0\rangle )U_3(|0\rangle )\rangle \) |
\(|100\rangle +|1U_2(|0\rangle )U_3(|0\rangle )\rangle \) | \(|100\rangle -|1U_2(0\rangle )U_3(|0\rangle )\rangle \) |
\(|01U_3(|1\rangle )\rangle +|0U_2(|1\rangle )1\rangle \) | \(|01U_3(|1\rangle )\rangle -|0U_2(|1\rangle )1\rangle \) |
\(|11U_3(|1\rangle )\rangle +|1U_2(|1\rangle )1\rangle \) | \(|11U_3(|1\rangle )\rangle -|1U_2(|1\rangle )1\rangle \) |
An eigenvector \(v\) can therefore be written as
with \(\alpha ,\beta , \gamma , \delta \in \mathbb C \). Such a vector is either non entangled, partially entangled or of GHZ-type. The same reasoning works if we consider \(u=U_1IU_3\) or \(u=U_1U_2I\).
Operators which do not involve the identity
There are \(27\) operators \(u_i=U^i _1U^i _2U^i _3\) such that \(U^i_j\in \{X,Y,Z\}\). Let \(u_1=U_1 ^1 U_2^1U_3^1\) and \(u_2=U_1^2U_2^2 U_3^2\) two such operators which commute. Because of the commuting assumption we necessarily have a \(j\in \{1,2,3\}\) such that \(U_j^1=U_j^2\). Without loss of generality let us assume that \(j=1\) and let \(v\) be a common eigenvector of \(u_1\) and \(u_2\). The vector \(v\) is also an eigenvector for \(u=u_1u_2\). But by composition \(u=u_1u_2=(U_1^1\times U_1^2)\otimes (U_2^1\times U_2^2)\otimes (U_3^1\times U_3^2)\), and \(U_1^1\times U_1 ^2=I\) by hypothesis (the notation \(\times \) stands for the usual product of matrices). Therefore \(u=u_1u_2=U_2^3U_3^3\) where \(U_2^3= U_2^1\times U_2^2\) and \(U_3^3=U_3^1\times U_3^2\). In other words \(u=u_1u_2\) is a Pauli operator of the three qubits system involving once the identity. By the previous step of our argument its eigenvector \(v\) is either non-entangled, partially entangled or of GHZ-type.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Planat, M., Saniga, M. & Holweck, F. Distinguished three-qubit ‘magicity’ via automorphisms of the split Cayley hexagon. Quantum Inf Process 12, 2535–2549 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-013-0547-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-013-0547-3