Skip to main content
Log in

Political business cycles 40 years after Nordhaus

  • Literature Survey
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article is to survey the huge literature that has emerged in the last four decades following Nordhaus’s (Rev Econ Stud 42(2):169–190, 1975) publication on political business cycles (PBCs). I first propose some developments in history of thought to examine the context in which this ground-breaking contribution saw the light of the day. I also present a simplified version of Nordhaus’s model to highlight his key results. I detail some early critiques of this model and the fields of investigations to which they gave birth. I then focus on the institutional context and examine its influence on PBCs, the actual research agenda. Finally, I derive some paths for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although it is the canonical expression, “political business cycles” can lead to possible confusion as it in fact refers to a particular type of cycle, namely opportunistic. An opportunistic cycle is the result of political manipulations before an election. In contrast, partisan cycles appear as a result of manipulation after the election. A generic term to designate both opportunistic and partisan cycles could be “politico-economic cycles” or “electoral cycles”. The first author to use the expression political business cycle even if not directly linked to elections was Kalecki (1943, p. 330). Michal Kelecki used this expression to qualify the inflation–unemployment cycle, which reflects fluctuations in the political power struggle between conflicting social classes. Moreover, he was rather silent on the government’s behavior. In his work, the government appears as a passive relay in class struggles, favoring the different classes alternately through stop and go policies.

  2. All the same, one notes that the reelection motivation is present, for example, in Tocqueville (1835).

  3. However, in these papers (and in subsequent papers by the same authors and their coauthors), one should note that the concept of cycle is missing, the political pressure being permanent and not only during elections. I will disregard here the literature concerning this “satisficing” version of the PBC model, but this idea will later be taken up and combined in the traditional electoral cycle (see Sect. 3.4).

  4. One might note that other articles or books dealing with the idea of PBCs, sometimes written independently of Nordhaus (1975), exist: Schumpeter (1939, in particular p. 391), Breton (1974, in particular p. 49), Ben-Porath (1975), Lindbeck (1976), Frey and Ramser (1976), Umstead (1977), Wagner (1977) and Lächler (1978).

  5. See de Haan (2013), de Haan and Klomp (2013), Drazen (2000, chapter 7; Drazen 2001), Franzese (2000, 2002), Franzese and Long-Jusko (2006), Olters (2001) and Shi and Svensson (2003) for the most recent references.

  6. Naïve rather than adaptive expectations, as in the Nordhaus model, are used here without loss of generality.

  7. For example, the specification of Nordhaus’s (1975) vote function has been criticized (e.g., Frey and Ramser 1976; Paldam 1981). I do not develop this point here because the debate about vote function was older and the critique of Nordhaus (1975) did not give rise to a new strand of literature in this area. However, this issue is related to the effectiveness of PBCs. Do the PBCs pay off in terms of votes? Examining the impact of pre-election budget deficit on reelection probability, Brender and Drazen’s (2008) conclusion is negative. Aidt et al. (2011) challenge this view and find that greater expenditures in the election year lead to greater vote differences between the incumbent and the main opponent (see also Veiga and Veiga 2007b, in this line). Moreover, some refinements of the Nordhaus model are not shown here because they have not yet given rise to further developments.

  8. One notes, however, that in partisan theory, the cycle is involuntary: the electoral calendar is a source of uncertainty and disrupts the agents who, not knowing which policy will be implemented after the elections, anticipate an inflation rate between the parties’ preferred rates. After the elections, expectations necessarily turn out to be false, which generates a cycle.

  9. Another way, as chosen by Nordhaus (1989), is to defend adaptive expectations by showing that people do not have rational expectations. Early critics of Nordhaus’s view of expectations include, among others, McCallum (1978), Keech (1980) and Paldam (1981). In these studies, voters’ sophistication and memory are also debated.

  10. Cukierman and Meltzer (1986) are also often quoted, but if they emphasize the role of information asymmetries, they do not deal explicitly with PBCs. Persson and Tabellini (1990) translate Rogoff (1990) into an inflation-unemployment setting.

  11. One should note, however, that an old and persisting literature exists that highlights the presence of PBCs in stock markets. For early references, see Umstead (1977) and Allvine and O’Neill (1980); for more recent references, see Sturm (2013) and Kräussl et al. (2014).

  12. The legitimacy of tests in terms of instruments rather than outcomes is reinforced by the fact that instruments are the action variables in rational PBC models. Besides all of their properties, their use for political purposes is, moreover, grounded theoretically. One also notes that budgetary variables are privileged over monetary variables because of the conjunction of two elements: (1) for one-country studies, there is a need for a degree of freedom which implies resorting to local data; (2) monetary policy is centralized at the national (or supra-national) level and is therefore not an instrument available to local governments.

  13. Conversely, when the incumbent expects to lose the election, it may prefer to use the debt strategically instead of generating a PBC. In doing so, it can constrain the next government by reducing the latter’s room for maneuver. In Borooah and van der Ploeg (1983), the “kamikaze” government, knowing it will lose power, pursues a ruinous economic policy, penalizing its successor to the point that the latter will not be reelected, which puts the suicidal government back at the helm. While Alesina and Tabellini (1990) predict an increase in debt whatever the party, Persson and Swensson (1989) highlight partisan differences according to the preferences of each party. The lowest spending party reduces taxes and in doing so, increases debt, thus forcing the next party to spend less. However, the highest spending party raises taxes, which creates a surplus and makes the next party’s policy easier to implement. This theory was tested with success by Pettersson-Lidbom (2001). In Tabellini and Alesina (1990), as the preferences of the next majority concerning the composition of expenditures are uncertain, the current median voter prefers higher debt to be sure that the next majority will have sufficient scope to implement its desired policy. Finally, in Aghion and Bolton (1990), the conservative party accumulates deficits when in power and voters reelect it as they deem the opposition (liberal) party unable to fight against deficits.

  14. Popularity can be considered a proxy for economic conditions, which can also have a direct impact on PBC. In Efthyvoulou (2012), the magnitude of a PBC is weaker when non-economic voting (measured by replies to a survey about households’ financial situation) is high. In Hanusch (2012), economic disturbances blur competence signals, which dampen PBCs. In Canes-Wrone and Park (2012), the traditional PBC is invisible because it is cancelled by another cycle in private investment which drops before the election owing to electoral uncertainty. In Alpanda and Honig (2010), the government is constrained in generating a PBC by its borrowing capacity. Finally, endowment in natural resources can play a role (Vergne 2009).

  15. This can be related to the growing literature on leviathan behavior (Brennan and Buchanan 1980), in which politicians are viewed as power-maximizing agents whose only purpose is to maximize the size of the public sector. In this literature, the electoral constraint modelled by the margin (the difference in vote shares or the distance from a 50 % vote share) affects budget outcomes. Ultimately, the empirical test looks very much like a classic PBC test in which the margin is substituted for the traditional electoral dummy. However, the interpretation is different. In the leviathan model, the margin is expected to be related positively to expenditure and taxes. The larger the margin, the greater the government’s capacity to increase expenditures and taxes (Dubois et al. 2007; Solé-Ollé 2003, 2006). In the PBC model, the larger the margin, the lower the incentive to intervene to secure reelection and the lower the expenditures and the higher the tax.

  16. Several other institutional variables that may exert an impact on the magnitude of PBCs have been studied: the quality of institutions by Shi and Svensson (2006), government transparency by Akhmedov and Zhuravskaya (2004), corruption by Shi and Svensson (2006), globalization by Efthyvoulou (2011), social capital measured by the level of generalized trust by Kouvavas (2013), direct versus indirect elections by Sjahrir et al. (2013) and the degree of decentralization (Vergne 2009; Shelton 2014). Among these miscellaneous issues, the special role of the media emerges. As one has seen, information is crucial in the formation of PBCs as informational asymmetries could be at their heart. The better informed the voters, the better their evaluation of government competence, which diminishes the incentives for the government to generate a PBC. Shi and Svensson (2006), Akhmedov and Zhuravskaya (2004), Alt and Rose (2007), Vergne (2009) and Shelton (2014) have found that voters’ access to media or media freedom does indeed have an impact on the magnitude of a PBC.

  17. Some of these studies do not deal explicitly with term limits but investigate an issue that is quite close, i.e., what happens to the PBC when the incumbent is seeking reelection (on the understanding that it is allowed to do so).

  18. See also the panel data studies of Alesina et al. (1997) and Palmer and Whitten (2000). It should be noted that besides these empirical studies, analytical models of the choice of election date have been proposed (see, among others, Smith 1996; Kayser 2005).

  19. In fact, through all of the settings that reduce inflationary bias: implementation of a rule (Barro and Gordon 1983), contract between the government and the central bank (Walsh 1995; see al-Nowaihi and Levine 1998, for the impact of such a contract on PBCs) or the appointment of a conservative central banker (Rogoff 1985).

  20. One might ask why the government could choose to give up the monetary instrument which could be so important in generating PBCs and therefore helpful in reelection. First, monetary policy would be less useful because it is less adapted to targeted interventions toward groups of voters. Fiscal instruments are more easily manipulated and have more immediate and clear impacts. Political gains from inflation are relatively blurred. Second, the adoption of an independent central bank could be a sign of good will towards the financial market to obtain more credibility and a better reputation. Credibility and reputation are crucial to obtain the confidence of the financial market and this confidence should help finance the public debt, which is also a tool for generating PBCs. Third, adopting an independent central bank could reduce volatility; volatility generates uncertainty and penalizes investment and therefore economic growth, which is the key indicator in the voters’ eyes.

  21. Usually measured by an index of the political constraints facing the executive when implementing policy.

  22. Usually measured by an index coding several aspects of the budget process (e.g., budget cycle frequency, the existence of multi-year expenditure forecasts, the requirement of published performance measures). In a somewhat related approach, Mourao (2008) shows that fiscal illusion, in hiding the real fiscal situation, aggravates the PBC. Finally, financial transparency should not be mistaken for transparency understood as the absence of corruption, which can also influence the PBC (Shi and Svensson 2006, Klomp and de Haan 2013c).

  23. Similarly, some scholars have studied PBCs in targeted taxes (e.g., Karran 1985; Ashworth and Heyndels 2002; Chaudhuri and Dasgupta 2005; Ehrhart 2013).

References

  • Abrams, B. A. (2006). How Richard Nixon pressured Arthur Burns: evidence from the Nixon tapes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, B. A., & Butkiewicz, J. L. (2012). The political business cycle: new evidence from the Nixon tapes. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(2–3), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, B. A., & Iossifov, P. (2006). Does the Fed contribute to a political business cycle? Public Choice, 129(3–4), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., & Bolton, P. (1990). Government domestic debt and the risk of default: a political-economic model of the strategic role of debt. In R. Dornbush & M. Draghi (Eds.), Public debt management: theory and history (pp. 315–349). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aidt, T. S., & Mooney, G. (2014). Voting suffrage and the political budget cycle: evidence from the London metropolitan boroughs 1902–1937. Journal of Public Economics, 112, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aidt, T. S., Veiga, F. J., & Veiga, L. G. (2011). Election results and opportunistic policies: a new test of the rational political business cycle model. Public Choice, 148(1–2), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerman, J. (1947). Political economic cycle. Kyklos, 1, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhmedov, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2004). Opportunistic political cycles: test in a young democracy setting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1301–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 651–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. (1988). Macroeconomics and politics. In S. Fischer (Ed.), NBER macroeconomics annual (pp. 13–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. (1989). Politics and business cycles in industrial democracies. Economic Policy, No, 8, 57–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Cohen, G., & Roubini, N. (1992). Macroeconomic policy and elections in OECD democracies. Economics and Politics, 4(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Cohen, G., & Roubini, N. (1993). Electoral business cycle in industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Economy, 9(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Roubini, N. (1992). Political cycles in OECD economies. Review of Economic Studies, 59(4), 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990). A political theory of fiscal deficits and government debt in a democracy. Review of Economic Studies, 57(3), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Troiano, U. & Cassidy, T. (2015). Old and young politicians. Unpublished working paper.

  • Allen, H. V. (1986). The Federal Reserve and the electoral cycle. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 18(1), 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S. D., & McCrickard, D. L. (1991). The influence of elections on Federal Reserve behaviour. Economics Letters, 37(1), 51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S. D., Sulock, J. M., & Sabo, W. A. (1986). The political business cycle: how significant? Public Finance Quarterly, 14(1), 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allvine, F. C., & O’Neill, D. E. (1980). Stock market returns and the presidential election cycle. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(5), 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • al-Nowaihi, A., & Levine, P. (1998). Can political monetary cycles be avoided? Journal of Monetary Economics, 42(3), 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpanda, S., & Honig, A. (2009). The impact of central bank independence on political monetary cycles in advanced and developing nations. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(7), 1365–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpanda, S., & Honig, A. (2010). Political monetary cycles and de facto ranking of central bank independence. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(6), 1003–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2006). Transparency, political polarization, and political budget cycles in OECD countries. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 530–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. E., & Rose, S. (2007). Context-conditioned political budget cycles. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 845–867). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amacher, R. C., & Boyes, W. J. (1978). Cycles in senatorial voting behavior: implications for the optimal frequency of elections. Public Choice, 33(3), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, B. (1987). Political survival: politicians and public policy in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, B., Hiroi, T., & Renno, L. (2005). The political economy of personnel expenditures: brazilian states, 1965–1994. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 50–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annett, A. M. (1993). Elections and macroeconomic outcomes in Ireland, 1948–91. Economic and Social Review, 25(1), 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artus, P. (1993). Théorie de la croissance et des fluctuations. Paris: P.U.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, J., & Heyndels, B. (2002). Tax structure turbulence in OECD countries. Public Choice, 111(1–2), 347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baber, W. R., & Sen, P. K. (1986). The political process and the use of debt financing by State governments. Public Choice, 48(3), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baleiras, R. N., & Santos, V. (2000). Behavioral and institutional determinants of political business cycles. Public Choice, 104(1–2), 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balke, N. S. (1990). The rational timing of parliamentary elections. Public Choice, 65(3), 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberia, L. G., & Avelino, G. (2011). Do political budget cycles differ in Latin American democracies? Economia, 11(2), 101–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Gordon, D. B. (1983). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(1), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (1982). Does there exist a political business cycle: a Box-Tiao analysis. Public Choice, 38(2), 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (1987). Elections and the Fed: is there a political monetary cycle? American Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 194–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, B., Bastida, F., & Vicente, C. (2013a). Creating room for manoeuvre: a strategy to generate political budget cycles under fiscal rules. Kyklos, 66(4), 467–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, B., Bastida, F., & Vicente, C. (2013b). Municipal elections and cultural expenditure. Journal of Cultural Economics, 37(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. (1975). The years of plenty and the years of famine – A political business cycle? Kyklos, 28(2), 400–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 769–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., & Nadeau, R. (1992). The electoral budget cycle. Public Choice, 74(4), 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaydes, L. (2011). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, S. A. (2002). Political business cycles, democratization, and economic reform: The case of Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 67(1), 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, S. A., Ferree, K. E., & Singh, S. (2003). Multiparty competition, founding elections and political business cycles in Africa. Journal of African Economies, 12(3), 444–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, S. A., & Vaaler, P. M. (2004). The price of democracy: sovereign risk ratings, bond spreads and political business cycles in developing countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 23(6), 917–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, R., & Crotty, J. (1975). Class conflict and macro-policy: the political business cycle. Review of Radical Political Economics, 7(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordignon, M., Cerniglia, F., & Revelli, F. (2003). In search for yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(2), 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. L. (1984). Electoral cycles and the earnings of federal bureaucrats. Economic Inquiry, 22(4), 447–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borooah, V. K., & van der Ploeg, F. (1983). Political aspects of the economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechler, J., & Geršl, A. (2014). Political legislation cycle in the Czech Republic. Constitutional Political Economy, 25(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2005). Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(7), 1271–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2007). Electoral fiscal policy in new, old, and fragile democracies. Comparative Economic Studies, 49(3), 446–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2008). How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? American Economic Review, 98(5), 2203–2220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2013). Elections, leaders, and the composition of government spending. Journal of Public Economics, 97, 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: analytical foundations of fiscal constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. (1974). The economic theory of representative government. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuss, F. (2008). A common election day for the Euro zone? Kyklos, 61(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brollo, F. & Troiano, U. (2013). What happens when a woman wins an election? Evidence from close races in Brazil. Unpublished working paper.

  • Canes-Wrone, B., & Park, J. K. (2012). Electoral business cycles in OECD countries. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cargill, T. F., & Hutchison, M. M. (1991). Political business cycles with endogenous election timing: evidence from Japan. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(4), 733–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, F. (1997). Opinion polls and political business cycles: theory and evidence for the United States. Public Choice, 92(3–4), 387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, V., & Veiga, F. J. (2004). Political business cycles and inflation stabilization. Economics Letters, 83(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. C. (2008). Electoral incentives and budgetary spending: rethinking the role of political institutions. Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1086–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, H. W., & Keech, W. R. (1986). Party differences in macroeconomic policies and outcomes. American Economic Review, 76(2), 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, D., & Peel, D. A. (1979). On the political theory of the business cycle. Economics Letters, 2(4), 327–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, K., & Dasgupta, S. (2005). Political determinants of central governments’ economic policies in India: empirical investigation. Journal of International Development, 17(7), 957–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chortareas, G. E. (1999). Political business cycles: theory, evidence and extension. In J. M. Mbaku & M. S. Kimenyi (Eds.), Institutions and collective choice in developing countries: applications of the theory of public choice (pp. 113–144). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, A. R. (1993). Political surfing over economic waves: parliamentary election timing in India. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1000–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. R., & Hallerberg, M. (2000). Mobile capital, domestic institutions, and electorally induced monetary and fiscal policy. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. R., & Reichert, U. N. (1998). International and domestic constraints on political business cycles in OECD economies. International Organization, 52(1), 87–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clingermayer, J. C., & Wood, B. D. (1995). Disentangling patterns of state debt financing. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, C., Veiga, F. J., & Veiga, L. G. (2006). Political business cycles in local employment: evidence from Portugal. Economics Letters, 93(1), 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A. (1992). Central bank strategy, credibility and independence: theory and evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A., & Meltzer, A. H. (1986). A positive theory of discretionary policy, the costs of democratic government and the benefits of a constitution. Economic Inquiry, 24(3), 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, T. R., & Ward, M. D. (1981). Military spending in the United States, Soviet Union, and the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25(3), 429–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L. S., Fratianni, M., & von Hagen, J. (1990). Testing for political business cycles. Journal of Policy Modeling, 12(1), 35–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J. (2013). Democracy, elections and government budget deficits. German Economic Review, 15(1), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J., & Klomp, J. (2013). Conditional political budget cycles: a review of recent evidence. Public Choice, 157(3–4), 387–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1835). De la démocratie en Amérique. Paris: C. Gosselin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, V., Farnworth, M., & Zhang, J. (2013). Opportunism and election timing by Canadian provincial and federal governments. Canadian Public Policy, 39(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinkel, R. (1981). Political business cycles in Germany and the United States: some theoretical and empirical considerations. In D. A. Hibbs & H. Fassbender (Eds.), Contemporary Political Economy (pp. 209–230). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, J., & Dufrene, U. B. (1993). The impacts of U.S. presidential elections on international security-markets. Global Finance Journal, 4(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, K., & Warin, T. (2007). The stability and growth pact: a European answer to the political budget cycle? Comparative European Politics, 5(4), 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957a). An economic theory of political action in democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957b). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (2000). The political business cycle after 25 years. In B. S. Bernanke & K. Rogoff (Eds.), NBER macroeconomic annual (pp. 75–137). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (2001). Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A., & Eslava, M. (2010). Electoral manipulation via voter-friendly spending: theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 92(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., & Vaubel, R. (2004). Do IMF and IBRD cause moral hazard and political business cycles? Evidence from panel data. Open Economies Review, 15(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, E., Leprince, M., & Paty, S. (2007). The effects of politics on local tax setting: evidence from France. Urban Studies, 44(8), 1603–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efthyvoulou, G. (2011). Political cycles under external economic constraints: evidence from Cyprus. Journal of Economics and Business, 63(6), 638–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efthyvoulou, G. (2012). Political budget cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures. Public Choice, 153(3–4), 295–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, H. (2013). Elections and the structure of taxation in developing countries. Public Choice, 156(1–2), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkelmann, S., & Leibrecht, M. (2013). Political expenditure cycles and election outcomes: evidence from disaggregation of public expenditures by economic functions. Economics Letters, 121(1), 128–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R. C. (1975). On controlling the economy to win elections. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No 397.

  • Faye, M., & Niehaus, P. (2012). Political aid cycles. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3516–3530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiwel, G. R. (1974). Reflection on Kalecki’s theory of political business cycle. Kyklos, 27(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J. S., & Voia, M. (2009). What determines the length of a typical Canadian parliamentary government? Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 42(4), 881–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, D. W. (1990). The political business cycle and republican administrations: an empirical investigation. Public Finance Quarterly, 18(3), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, S. R. (1994). Stock market performance and elections: made-in-Canada effects? (pp. 39–42). Summer: Canadian Investment Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, S. R., & Schmitz, J. J. (1997). The transmission of U.S. election cycles to international stock returns. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, R. J. (2000). Review of A. Alesina & N. Roubini with G. Cohen, Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 19(3), 501–509.

  • Franzese, R. J. (2002). Electoral and partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 369–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, R. J., & Long-Jusko, K. (2006). Political-economic cycles. In B. R. Weingast & D. Wittman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy (pp. 545–564). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Lau, L. J. (1968). Towards a mathematical model of government behaviour. Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie, 28, 355–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Ramser, H. J. (1976). The political business cycle: a comment. Review of Economic Studies, 43(3), 553–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Schneider, F. (1978a). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the US. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60(2), 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Schneider, F. (1978b). A politico-economic model of the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 88(350), 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1972). Monetary policy. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 116(3), 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froyen, R. T., Havrilesky, T. W., & Waud, R. N. (1997). The asymmetric effects of political pressures on U.S. monetary policy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 19(3), 471–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, E., & Rossi, S. P. S. (2002). Political budget cycles: the case of the Western German länder. Public Choice, 110(3–4), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamez, C., & Ibarra-yunez, A. (2007). Political cycles and public expenditures at subnational level: the case of Mexico. Public Administration, 4(16), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M., Prado-Lorenzo, J. M. & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2011). Do progressive governments undertake different debt burdens? Partisan vs. electoral cycles. Revista de Contabilidad, 14(1), 29–57.

  • Gärtner, M. (1999). The election cycle in the inflation bias: evidence from the G-7 countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 15(4), 705–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaubatz, K. T. (1991). Election cycles and war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(2), 212–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzner, M. (2002). Determinants of public cultural expenditures: an exploratory time series analysis for Austria. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(4), 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzner, M. (2004). Cultural policies and fiscal federalism. Public Finance and Management, 4(1), 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geys, B. (2007). Government weakness and electoral cycles in local public debt: evidence from Flemish municipalities. Local Government Studies, 33(2), 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gildea, J. A. (1990). Explaining FOMC members’ votes. In T. Mayer (Ed.), The political economy of American monetary policy (pp. 211–227). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, V., & Michel, P. (1983). Random timing of elections and the political business cycle. Public Choice, 40(2), 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goeminne, S., & Smolders, C. (2014). Politics and public infrastructure investments in local governments: empirical evidence from Flemish municipalities (1996–2009). Local Government Studies, 40(2), 182–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, D. G., & Poterba, J. M. (1980). The price of popularity: the political business cycle re-examined. American Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 696–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, M. (2002). Do changes in democracy affect the political budget cycle? Evidence from Mexico. Review of Development Economics, 6(2), 204–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K. B. (1987). Presidential elections and Federal Reserve policy: an empirical test. Southern Economic Journal, 54(2), 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K. B. (1989). On the existence of a political monetary cycle. American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 376–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grier, R. M., & Grier, K. B. (2000). Political cycles in nontraditional settings: theory and evidence from the case of Mexico. Journal of Law and Economics, 43(1), 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, L. J., Devine, J. A. and Wallace, M. (1982a). Monopoly capital, organized labor, and military expenditures in the United States, 1949–1976. American Journal of Sociology, 88(S), S113–S153.

  • Griffin, L. J., Devine, J. A., & Wallace, M. (1982b). The political economy of military spending: evidence from the United States. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, G. (2009). China’s local political budget cycles. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadri, K., Lockwood, B., & Maloney, J. (1998). Does central bank independence smooth the political business cycle in inflation some OECD evidence. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 66(4), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, T. (2007). Estimating the effect of parliamentary elections on primary budget deficits in OECD countries. Economics Bulletin, 8(8), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M., Vinhas da Souza, L., & Clark, W. R. (2002). Political business cycles in EU accession countries. European Union Politics, 3(2), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M., & von Hagen, J. (1998). Electoral institutions and the budget process. In K. Fukasaku & R. Hausmann (Eds.), Democracy, decentralization and deficits in Latin America (pp. 65–94). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanusch, M. (2012). Mooted signals: economic disturbances and political budget cycles. Journal of Applied Economics, 15(2), 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrilesky, T. M. (1988). Monetary policy signalling from the Administration to the Federal Reserve. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 20(1), 82–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrilesky, T. M., & Gildea, J. A. (1992). Reliable and unreliable partisan appointees to the board of governors. Public Choice, 73(4), 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrilesky, T. M., & Schweitzer, R. (1990). A theory of FOMC dissent voting with evidence from the time series. In T. Mayer (Ed.), The political economy of American monetary policy (pp. 197–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. E., & Stone, J. A. (1988). Does the political business cycle dominate US unemployment and inflation? Some new evidence. In T. D. Willett (Ed.), Political business cycles: the political economy of money, inflation and unemployment (pp. 276–293). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. E., & Stone, J. A. (1989). An integrated test for electoral cycles in the US economy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(3), 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. E., & Stone, J. A. (1990). Political models of the business cycle should be revived. Economic Inquiry, 28(3), 442–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckelman, J. C., & Berument, H. (1998). Political business cycles and endogenous elections. Southern Economic Journal, 64(4), 987–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A. (1994). The partisan model of macroeconomic cycles. Economics and Politics, 6(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiroi, T. (2009). Exchange rate regime, central bank independence, and political business cycles in Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. H., & Huang, C. J. (2013). Presidential election, checks and balances, and allocation of public expenditures in Taiwan. Journal of Economics and Management, 9(1), 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgos, D., & Zimmermann, K. W. (2010). It takes two to tango: lobbies and the political business cycle. Kyklos, 63(3), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoguchi, T. (1979). Political surfing over economic waves: a simple model of the Japanese political-economic system in comparative perspective. Unpublished working paper.

  • Ito, T. (1990). The timing of elections and political business cycles in Japan. Journal of Asian Economics, 1(1), 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. (1991). International impacts on domestic political economy: a case of Japanese general elections. Journal of International Money and Finance, 10, S73–S89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T., & Park, J. H. (1988). Political business cycles in the parliamentary system. Economics Letters, 27(3), 233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R., & Siklos, P. L. (1994). Political effects on central bank behaviour: some international evidence. In P. L. Siklos (Ed.), Variety of monetary reforms: lessons and experiences on the road to monetary union (pp. 133–163). Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kächelein, H., Lami, E., & Imami, D. (2011). Election-related cycles in publicly supplied goods in Albania. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 9(1), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1943). Political aspects of full employment. Political Quarterly, 14(4), 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamlet, M. S., & Mowery, D. C. (1987). Influences on executive and congressional budgetary priorities, 1955–1981. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakas, M. (2014). Political business cycles in Turkey: a monetary approach. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 13(48), 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karran, T. (1985). The determinants of taxation in Britain: an empirical test. Journal of Public Policy, 5(3), 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katada, S. N., & McKeown, T. J. (1998). Aid politics and electoral politics: Japan, 1970–1992. International Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 591–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsimi, M. (1998). Explaining the size of the public sector. Public Choice, 96(1–2), 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsimi, M., & Sarantides, V. (2012). Do elections affect the composition of fiscal policy in developed, established democracies? Public Choice, 151(1–2), 325–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayser, M. A. (2005). Who surfs, who manipulates? The determinants of opportunistic election timing and electorally motivated economic intervention. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keech, W. R. (1980). Elections and macroeconomic policy optimization. American Journal of Political Science, 24(2), 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keech, W. R., & Simon, C. P. (1983). Inflation, unemployment, and electoral terms: when can reform of political institutions improve macroeconomic policy? In K. R. Monroe (Ed.), The political process and economic change (pp. 77–107). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M. W. (1988). Is the political business cycle really dead? Southern Economic Journal, 55(1), 86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khemani, S. (2004). Political cycles in a developing economy: effect of elections in the Indian states. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschen, E. S., Bénard, J., Besters, H., Blackaby, F., Eckstein, O., Faaland, J., et al. (1964). Economic policy in our time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2004). Political cycles and economic policy in Israel: 1980–1999. Israel Economic Review, 2(1), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F. A. (2010). Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil. Revista de Administração Pública, 44(2), 283–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F. A., & Sakurai, S. N. (2015). Term limits and political budget cycles at the local level: evidence from a young democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 37, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klien, M. (2014). Tariff increases over the electoral cycle: a question of size and salience. European Journal of Political Economy, 36, 228–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klomp, J., & de Haan, J. (2013a). Political budget cycles and election outcomes. Public Choice, 157(1–2), 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klomp, J., & de Haan, J. (2013b). Popular protest and political budget cycles: a panel data analysis. Economics Letters, 120(3), 516–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klomp, J., & de Haan, J. (2013c). Do political budget cycles really exist? Applied Economics, 45(3), 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone, R. D., & McKenzie, K. J. (2001). Electoral and partisan cycles in fiscal policy: an examination of Canadian provinces. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(5–6), 753–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohno, M., & Nishizawa, Y. (1990). A study of the electoral business cycle in Japan: elections and government spending on public construction. Comparative Politics, 22(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouvavas, O. (2013). Political budget cycles revisited, the case for social capital. Unpublished working paper.

  • Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, G. A. (2005). Electoral incentives, political business cycles, and macroeconomic performance: empirical evidence from Postwar U.S. personal income growth. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kräussl, R., Lucas, A., Rijsbergen, D. R., van der Sluis, P. J., & Vrugt, E. B. (2014). Washington meets Wall Street: a closer examination of the presidential cycle puzzle. Journal of International Money and Finance, 43, 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lächler, U. (1978). The political business cycle: a complementary study. Review of Economic Studies, 45(2), 369–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lächler, U. (1982). On political business cycles with endogenous election dates. Journal of Public Economics, 17(1), 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladewig, J. W. (2008). Housing starts and the political business cycle. American Politics Research, 36(5), 776–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagona, F., & Padovano, F. (2008). The political legislation cycle. Public Choice, 134(3–4), 201–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lami, E., Kächelein, H., & Imami, D. (2014). A new view into political business cycles: household expenditures in Albania. Acta Oeconomica, 64, 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laney, L. O., & Willett, T. D. (1983). Presidential politics, budget deficits and monetary policy in the United-States, 1960–1976. Public Choice, 40(1), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L. J., & Frey, B. S. (1971). Ideology, public approval, and government behavior. Public Choice, 10, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leertouwer, E., & Maier, P. (2001). Who creates political business cycles: should central banks be blamed? European Journal of Political Economy, 17(3), 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lema, D. & Streb, J. M. (2013). Party alignment and political budget cycles: the Argentine provinces. Unpublished working paper.

  • Levitt, S. D. (1997). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. American Economic Review, 87(3), 270–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. (1976). Stabilization policy in open economies with endogenous politicians. American Economic Review, 66(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, S. (1998a). Rationalizing the political business cycle: a workhorse model. Economics and Politics, 10(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, S. (1998b). Federalism and central bank independence: the politics of German monetary policy, 1957–1992. World Politics, 50(3), 401–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, D. (1977). A political model of the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy, 85(2), 239–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, P., Sturm, J.-E., & de Haan, J. (2002). Political pressure on the Bundesbank: an empirical investigation using the Havrilesky approach. Journal of Macroeconomics, 24(1), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B. T. (1978). The political business cycle: an empirical test. Southern Economic Journal, 44(3), 504–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGavin, B. H. (1987). The political business cycle: a reexamination of some empirical evidence. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 26(1), 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, M., & de Haan, J. (2006). Are there political budget cycles in the Euro area? European Union Politics, 7(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, A. (1988). Electoral cycles and defence spending: a comparison of Israel and the United States. Comparative Political Studies, 21(3), 368–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, A., & Hicks, A. (1984). Military Keynesianism in the United States, 1949–1976: disaggregating military expenditures and their determination. American Journal of Sociology, 90(2), 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, A., & Ward, M. D. (1988). The evolution of Israel’s military expenditures: 1960–1983. The Western Political Quarterly, 41(3), 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourao, P. R. (2008). Political budget cycles and fiscal illusion – A panel data study. In H. Marques, E. Soukiazis, & P. Cerqueira (Eds.), Perspectives on integration and globalisation (pp. 83–110). Munster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, O. A., & Borsani, H. (2004). Presidents and cabinets: the political determinants of fiscal behavior in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto-Parra, S., & Santiso, J. (2012). Revisiting political budget cycles in Latin America. In J. Santiso & J. Dayton-Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Latin American political economy (pp. 557–584). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nincic, M. (1990). U.S. Soviet policy and the electoral connection. World Politics, 42(3), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nincic, M., & Cusack, T. R. (1979). The political economy of US military spending. Journal of Peace Research, 16(2), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nippani, S., & Arize, A. C. (2005). U.S. presidential election impact on Canadian and Mexican stock markets. Journal of Economics and Finance, 29(3), 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nogare, C. D., & Galizzi, M. M. (2011). The political economy of cultural spending: evidence from Italian cities. Journal of Cultural Economics, 35(3), 203–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, D. (2007). Fiscal pressures, institutional context, and constituents: a dynamic model of states’ art agency appropriations. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(4), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1972). The political business cycle. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No 333.

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1989). Alternative approaches to the political business cycles. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No, 2, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olters, J.-P. (2001). Modeling politics with economic tools: a critical survey of the literature. IMF Working Paper No. 01/10.

  • Özatay, F. (2007). Public sector price controls and electoral cycles. Applied Economics, 39(4), 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, C. A. (1996). Electoral price cycles in regulated industries. World Development, 24(10), 1673–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (1981). An essay on the rationality of the economic policy: the test-case of the electional cycle. Public Choice, 37(2), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, H. D., & Whitten, G. D. (2000). Government competence, economic performance and endogenous election dates. Electoral Studies, 19(2–3), 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepinsky, T. (2007). Autocracy, elections, and fiscal policy: evidence from Malaysia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 42(1–2), 136–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Swensson, L. (1989). Why a stubborn conservative would run a deficit. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(2), 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1990). Macroeconomic policy, credibility and politics. Chur, Switzerland: Hardwood Academics Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: explaining economic policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. & Tabellini, G. (2003). The economic effects of constitutions. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

  • Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2001). An empirical investigation of the strategic use of debt. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 570–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. (1997). Political business cycles and macroeconomic credibility: a survey. Public Choice, 92(3–4), 407–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. (1998). Comment on “The politics of the political business cycle”. British Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, B. G. (1998). Endogenous elections, electoral budget cycles and Canadian provincial governments. Public Choice, 97(1–2), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remmer, K. L. (1993). The political economy of elections in Latin America, 1980–1991. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remmer, K. L. (2007). The political economy of patronage: expenditure patterns in the Argentine provinces, 1983–2003. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1985). The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(403), 1069–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80(1), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macro-economic policy cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 55(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. (2006). Do fiscal rules dampen the political business cycle? Public Choice, 128(3–4), 407–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. (2008). The political manipulation of US state rainy day funds under rules versus discretion. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8(2), 150–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumi, C. (2014). National electoral cycles in transfers to subnational jurisdictions: evidence from Argentina. Journal of Applied Economics, 17(1), 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A., & Sekkat, K. (1999). Optimum electoral areas: should Europe adopt a single election day? European Economic Review, 43(8), 1595–1619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A., & Sekkat, K. (2002). Political cycles, Fiscal deficits, and Output spillovers in Europe. Public Choice, 111(1–2), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T. J., & Wallace, N. (1975). Rational expectations, the optimal monetary instrument and the optimal money supply rule. Journal of Political Economy, 83(2), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. J. (2010). Fighting with one hand tied behind the back: political budget cycles in the West German states. Public Choice, 142(1–2), 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, L. (1996). Political business cycles and fiscal policies in developing countries. Kyklos, 49(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, L. (1999). Fiscal policy cycles and the exchange rate regime in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 15(3), 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, L. (2000). Fiscal policy cycles and public expenditure in developing countries. Public Choice, 102(1–2), 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. A. (1995). The politics of political business cycle. British Journal of Political Science, 25(1), 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serritzlew, S. (2005). Breaking budgets: an empirical examination of Danish municipalities. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(4), 413–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, C. A. (2014). Legislative budget cycles. Public Choice, 159(1–2), 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2003). Political budget cycles: a review of recent developments. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 29(1), 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2006). Political budget cycles: do they differ across countries and why? Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1367–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W. F, I. I., & Tollison, R. D. (1985). Legislation and political business cycles. Kyklos, 38(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieg, G. (1997). A model of partisan central banks and opportunistic political cycles. European Journal of Political Economy, 13(3), 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjahrir, B. S., Kis-Katos, K., & Schulze, G. G. (2013). Political budget cycles in Indonesia at the district level. Economics Letters, 120(2), 342–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Random House.

  • Smith, A. (1996). Endogenous election timing in majoritarian parliamentary systems. Economics and Politics, 8(2), 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2003). Election timing in majoritarian parliaments. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2004). Election timing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, B. H. (1988). Political instability and economic fluctuations in the Republic of Korea. Public Choice, 57(3), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé Ollé, A. (2003). Electoral accountability and tax mimicking: the effects of electoral margins, coalition government, and ideology. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(4), 685–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé Ollé, A. (2006). The effects of party competition on budget outcomes: empirical evidence from local governments in Spain. Public Choice, 126(1–2), 145–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spafford, D. (1981). Highway employment and provincial elections. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 14(1), 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streb, J. M. (1999). Reelection or term limits? The short and the long run view of economic policy. Estudios de economía, 26(2), 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streb, J. M., Lema, D., & Garofalo, P. (2012). Temporal aggregation in political budget cycles. Economía, 13(1), 39–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streb, J. M., Lema, D., & Garofalo, P. (2013). Electoral cycles in international reserves: evidence from Latin America and the OECD. Revista di Economia, 20(2), 27–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streb, J. M., Lema, D., & Torrens, G. (2009). Checks and balances on political budget cycles: cross-country evidence. Kyklos, 62(3), 426–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, R. R. (2013). Economic policy and the presidential election cycle in stock returns. Journal of Economics and Finance, 37(2), 200–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, T. T., Kamlet, M. S., & Mowery, D. C. (1993). Modeling US budgetary and fiscal policy outcomes: a disaggregated, systemwide perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 213–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukhtankar, S. (2012). Sweetening the deal? Political connections and sugar mills in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(3), 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, M. (1994). Evolutionary voter sophistication and political business cycle. Public Choice, 81(3–4), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, O. H., & Swank, J. (1993). In search of the motives behind US fiscal macroeconomic policy. Applied Economics, 25(8), 1013–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G., & Alesina, A. (1990). Voting on the budget deficit. American Economic Review, 80(1), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telatar, F. (2003). Political business cycles in the parliamentary systems: evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 39(4), 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrones, M. (1989). Macroeconomic policy choices under alternative electoral structures. University of Western Ontario research report No 8905.

  • Theil, H. (1958). Economic forecasts and policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies, C., & Porche, S. (2007). The political economy of agricultural protection. The Journal of Politics, 69(1), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R., & Zuk, G. (1983). American elections and the international electoral-economic cycle: a test of the Tufte hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 27(3), 464–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1952). On the theory of economic policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umstead, D. A. (1977). Forecasting stock market prices. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dalen, H. P., & Swank, O. H. (1996). Government spending cycles: ideological or opportunistic. Public Choice, 89(1–2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaubel, R. (1997). The bureaucratic and partisan behavior of independent central bank: German and international evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 13(2), 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, L. G., & Pinho, M. M. (2007). The political economy of intergovernmental grants: evidence from a maturing democracy. Public Choice, 133(3–4), 457–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, L. G., & Veiga, F. J. (2007a). Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice, 131(1–2), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, L. G., & Veiga, F. J. (2007b). Does opportunism pay off? Economics Letters, 96(2), 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergne, C. (2009). Democracy, elections and allocation of public expenditures in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente, C., Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2013). Transparency and political budget cycles at municipal level. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voia, M. C., & Ferris, J. S. (2013). Do business cycle peaks predict election calls in Canada? European Journal of Political Economy, 29, 102–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (1977). Economic manipulation for political profit. Kyklos, 30(3), 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. E. (1995). Optimal contract for central banker. American Economic Review, 85(1), 150–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, A. M. (1983). Political business cycles, presidential elections, and suicide and mortality. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, J. (2013). Electoral budget cycles in legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38(4), 545–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. T. (1990). The political manipulation of macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 84(3), 767–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1977). Candidates with policy preferences: a dynamic model. Journal of Economic Theory, 14(1), 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1983). Candidate motivation: a synthesis of alternative theories. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. E. & Chrystal, K. A. (I981). Public sector behaviour: the status of the political business cycle. In Currie, D. A., Nobay, A. R. & Peel, D. (Eds.), Macroeconomic analysis: essays in macroeconomics and econometrics. London: Croom Helm, PP. 353–382.

  • Zuk, G., & Woodbury, N. R. (1986). U.S. defense spending, electoral cycles, and Soviet-American relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30(3), 445–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank William F. Shughart II and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Dubois.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dubois, E. Political business cycles 40 years after Nordhaus. Public Choice 166, 235–259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0313-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0313-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation