Do barriers to candidacy reduce political competition? Evidence from a bachelor’s degree requirement for legislators in Pakistan
- Madiha Afzal
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In the 2002 election, candidates for Pakistan’s federal legislature had to possess at least a bachelor’s degree. This policy disqualified 60 out of the 207 incumbent legislators from running for election again. Using a difference-in-differences approach with panel data on all electoral constituencies in Pakistan, I find that this ballot access restriction does not affect political competition across all constituencies with disqualified incumbents equally. Stronger political competition is defined as a larger number of candidates contesting election, a smaller vote share and vote margin for the winning candidate, and a less concentrated candidate field, as measured by a Herfindahl–Hirschman index (HHI) of vote shares. Competition declined significantly in constituencies where the disqualified incumbent belonged to a small party and where literacy levels were lower (signifying a smaller pool of substitute candidates). However, political competition increased in areas where the disqualified incumbent was stronger in terms of his winning vote margin.
- Adams, J., Merrill, S. (2006) Why small, centrist third parties motivate policy divergence by major parties. American Political Science Review 50: pp. 403-417
- Ansolabehere, S., Gerber, A. (1996) The effects of filing fees and petition requirements on US House elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 21: pp. 249-264 CrossRef
- Bardhan, P., Yang, T. (2004) Political competition in economic perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley
- Besley, T., Persson, T., Sturm, D. (2010) Political competition and economic performance: evidence from the United States. Review of Economic Studies 77: pp. 1329-1352 CrossRef
- Besley, T., Burgess, R. (2002) The political economy of government responsiveness: theory and evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: pp. 1415-1451 CrossRef
- Besley, T., Case, A. (1995) Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: pp. 769-798 CrossRef
- Bhatty, M. (2002) Positive electoral reforms. The dawn newspaper—opinion.
- Drometer, M., Rincke, J. (2009) The impact of ballot access restrictions on electoral competition: evidence from a natural experiment. Public Choice 138: pp. 461-474 CrossRef
- Drometer, M., Rincke, J. (2008) The design of political institutions: electoral competition and the choice of ballot access restrictions in the United States.
- Haven, P. (2002) Pakistan candidates must have degree. The Washington post.
- Lijphart, A. (1990) The political consequences of electoral laws, 1945–85. American Political Science Review 84: pp. 481-497 CrossRef
- Linden, L. (2005). Could have been a contender? The effects of limiting the number of candidates in Indian state parliamentary elections. Unpublished manuscript.
- Rae, D. (1971) The political consequences of electoral laws. Yale University Press, New Haven
- Rehman, I. A. (2006) Polls and madrassah ‘sanads’. The dawn newspaper—opinion.
- Stratmann, T. (2005) Ballot access restrictions and candidate entry in elections. European Journal of Political Economy 21: pp. 59-71 CrossRef
- Tullock, G. (1965) Entry barriers in politics. The American Economic Review 55: pp. 458-466
- Do barriers to candidacy reduce political competition? Evidence from a bachelor’s degree requirement for legislators in Pakistan
Volume 161, Issue 1-2 , pp 51-72
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Political competition
- Barriers to candidacy
- Ballot access
- Industry Sectors
- Madiha Afzal (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA