Skip to main content
Log in

Risk-aversion and prudence in rent-seeking games

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers a common n-agent symmetric rent-seeking game. It derives conditions so that risk-aversion and risk always decrease rent-seeking efforts. These conditions hold for any regular contest success function when risk-averse rent-seekers are also prudent. Under n=2, prudence is a necessary and sufficient condition for risk-aversion to decrease rent-seeking efforts compared to risk-neutrality. An intuition for this result is given based on a self-protection model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcalde, J., & Dahm, M. (2007). Tullock and Hirshleifer: a meeting of the minds. Review of Economic Design, 11, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramoullé, Y., & Treich, N. (2009). Can uncertainty alleviate the commons problem? Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 1042–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. D., Hillman, A. L., & Konrad, K. A. (2008). 40 years of research on rent-seeking (Vols. 1 & 2). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corchon, L., & Dahm, M. (2009). Foundations for contest success functions. Economic Theory (forthcoming).

  • Corcoran, W. J., & Karels, G. V. (1985). Rent-seeking behavior in the long-run. Public Choice, 46, 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R., & Hartley, R. (2003). Risk aversion, heterogeneity and contests. Public Choice, 117, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R., & Hartley, R. (2008). Risk aversion in symmetric and asymmetric contests. Economic Theory (forthcoming).

  • Dachraoui, K., Dionne, G., Eeckhoudt, L., & Godfroid, P. (2004). Comparative mixed risk aversion: definition and application to self-protection and willingness to pay. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29, 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1987). Strategic behavior in constests. American Economic Review, 77, 891–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L., & Gollier, C. (2005). The impact of prudence on optimal prevention. Economic Theory, 26, 989–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L., Gollier, C., & Schlesinger, H. (2005). Economic and financial decisions under risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eso, P., & White, L. (2004). Precautionary bidding in auctions. Econometrica, 72, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, M. R., & Skaperdas, S. (2007). Economics of conflict: an overview. In T. Sandler & K. Hartley (Eds.), Handbook of defense economics (Vol. II, pp. 649–709).

  • Geiss, C., Menezes, C., & Tressler, J. (1980). Increasing downside risk. American Economic Review, 70, 921–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L., & Katz, E. (1984). Risk-averse rent seekers and the social cost of monopoly power. Economic Journal, 94, 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (2001). The dark side of the force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, B., Salanié, B., & Salanié, F. (1999). Should more risk-averse agents exert more efforts? Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 24, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, M. (1990). Precautionary savings in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 58, 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, K. A. (2007). Strategy in contests: an introduction. Mimeo.

  • Konrad, K. A., & Schlesinger, H. (1997). Risk aversion in rent-seeking and rent-augmenting games. Economic Journal, 107, 1671–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. E. (1968). Savings and uncertainty: the precautionary demand for saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 45, 621–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malueg, D. A., & Yates, A. (2005). Equilibria and comparative statics in two-player contests. European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 738–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1994). Comparing equilibria. American Economic Review, 84, 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Castrillo, D. J., & Verdier, T. (1992). A general analysis of rent-seeking games. Public Choice, 73, 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas, S. (1996). Contest success functions. Economic Theory, 7, 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas, S., & Gan, L. (1995). Risk aversion in contests. Economic Journal, 105, 951–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szidarowszky, F., & Okuguchi, K. (1997). On the existence and uniqueness of pure Nash equilibrium in rent-seeking games. Games and Economics Behavior, 18, 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent-seeking. In J. M. Buchanan, R. D. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society (pp. 97–112). College Station: Texas A. & M. University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Long, N., & Vousden, N. (1987). Risk-averse rent seeking with shared rents. Economic Journal, 971–985.

  • Wärneryd, K. (2003). Information in conflicts. Journal of Economic Theory, 121–136.

  • Yamazaki, T. (2009). The uniqueness of pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in rent-seeking games with risk-averse players. Public Choice, 139(3–4), 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Treich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treich, N. Risk-aversion and prudence in rent-seeking games. Public Choice 145, 339–349 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9569-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9569-x

JEL Classification

Navigation