Skip to main content
Log in

It’s all ‘bad’ news! Voters’ perception of macroeconomic policy competence

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to consider how voters form perceptions about macroeconomic policy competence by focusing on the role of recent macroeconomic news: Do their perceived views of good news matter as much as bad news when they form beliefs about the incumbent government’s competence in managing the macroeconomy, in particular, with regard to their ability to control inflation and unemployment? We find that ‘bad’ news about unemployment persists when households are forming their perceived competence, whereas “good” news does not. That is, voters tend to display pessimistic bias when forming perceptions about the incumbent government’s competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G., & Dickens, W. (1982). The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. American Economic Review, 72(2), 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, D., & Imperator, I. (2001). The rationality of information gathering: monopoly. Manchester School, 69(3), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birney, M., & Shapiro, I. (2005). The political uses of public opinion: lessons from the estate tax repeal. Mimeo, Yale University.

  • Blood, D. J., & Phillips, P. C. B. (1995). Recession headline news, Consumer Sentiment, the state of the economy and Presidential popularity: a time series analysis 1989–1993. International Journal of Public Opinion, 7(1), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H., & Price, D. (1975). Voter response to short-run economics conditions: the asymmetric effect of prosperity and recessions. American Political Science Review, 69, 1240–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2002). Sociotropes, systematic bias, and political failure: reflections on the survey of Americans and economists on the economy. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 416–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. D. (2006). The epidemiology of macroeconomic expectations. In L. Blume & S. Durlauf (Eds.), The economy as an evolving complex system, III. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boef, S., & Kellstedt, P. (2004). The political (and economic) origins of consumer confidence. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dua, P., Smyth, D., & Taylor, S. W. (1995). Public perceptions of macroeconomic policy during the Bush presidency. Southern Economic Journal, 61, 775–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easaw, J., & Ghoshray, A. (2007). Confidence or competence? Do presidencies matter for households’ subjective preferences? European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 1025–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easaw, J., & Ghoshray, A. (2009). Households’ forming subjective expectations about the macroeconomy: is ‘bad’ news as important as ‘good’ news? Bath Economics Research Working Papers (forthcoming).

  • Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2006). Can anticipatory feelings explain anomalous choices of information sources? Games and Economic Behavior, 56, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, B. H., & Norpoth, H. (1994). Let the good times roll: the economic expectations of US voters. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 625–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, B. H., & Norpoth, H. (1997). Reality bites: news exposure and economic opinion. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. (1979). The mass public and macroeconomic performance: the dynamics of public opinion towards unemployment and inflation. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 705–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katona, G. (1975). Psychological economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigson, S. (2004). Consumer confidence and consumer spending. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, M., Erikson, R., & Stimson, J. (1992). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the US economy. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 597–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norpoth, H. (1996). Presidents and the prospective voter. The Journal of Politics, 58(3), 776–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (2003). Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 665–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Review of Economic Studies, 55, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, D., Dua, P., & Taylor, S. (1999). Estimating the public’s social preference function between inflation and unemployment using survey data: The Survey Research Center versus Gallup. Empirical Economics, 24, 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, M. (2007). Nonexpert beliefs about the macroeconomic consequences of economic and noneconomic events. Public Choice, 132, 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshy Easaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Easaw, J. It’s all ‘bad’ news! Voters’ perception of macroeconomic policy competence. Public Choice 145, 253–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9564-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9564-2

JEL Classification

Navigation