Alvarez, R. M. (1999). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (1995). American ambivalence towards abortion policy: development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science
Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (1997). Are Americans ambivalent towards racial policies? American Journal of Political Science
Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (2002). Hard choices, easy answers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Alvarez, R. M., & Franklin, C. H. (1994). Uncertainty and political perceptions. Journal of Politics
Banducci, S. A. (1998). Searching for ideological consistency in direct legislation voting. In S. Bowler, T. Donovan & C. J. Tolbert (Eds.), Citizens as legislators. Direct democracy in the United States. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Bartels, L. M. (1986). Issue voting under uncertainty: an empirical test. American Journal of Political Science
Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Are voters better informed when they have a larger say in politics? Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland. Public Choice
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (1994). Information and opinion change on ballot propositions. Political Behavior
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (1998). Demanding choices: opinion, voting, and direct democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Happ, T. (1992). Ballot propositions and information costs: direct democracy and the fatigued voter. Western Political Quarterly
Branton, R. P. (2003). Examining individual-level voting behavior on state ballot propositions. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 367–377.
Braumoeller, B. F. (2006). Explaining variance; or, stuck in a moment we can’t get out of. Political Analysis
Brockington, D. (2003). A low information theory of ballot position effect. Political Behavior
Christin, T., Hug, S., & Sciarini, P. (2002). Interest and information in referendum voting: an analysis of swiss voters. European Journal of Political Research
Cronin, T. E. (1989). Direct democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Darcy, R., & McAllister, I. (1990). Ballot position effects. Electoral Studies
Downs, G. W., & Rocke, D. M. (1979). Interpreting heteroscedasticity. American Journal of Political Science
Dubois, P. L., & Feeney, F. (1998). Lawmaking by initiative: issues, opinions, and comparisons. New York: Agathon Press.
Enelow, J. M., & Hinich, M. J. (1984). The spatial theory of voting. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. J. M. Enelow, M. J. Hinich, Includes index. Bibliography: pp. 224–228.
Frey, B. S. (1994). Direct democracy: politico-economic lessons from swiss experience. The American Economic Review, 84, 338–342.
Gerber, E. R. (1999). The populist paradox: interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gerber, E. R., & Lupia, A. (1993). When do campaigns matter? Informed votes, the heteroscedastic logit and the responsiveness of electoral outcomes. Social science working paper 814. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.
Gerber, E. R., & Lupia, A. (1995). Campaign competition and policy responsiveness in direct legislation elections. Political Behavior
Harvey, A. C. (1976). Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroscedasticity. Econometrica
Hug, S., & Schulz, T. (2007). Left-right positions of political parties in Switzerland. Party Politics
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
Kriesi, H. (2005). Direct democratic choice. The swiss experience. Oxford: Lexington.
Krosnick, J. A., & Miller, J. A. (1998). The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 291–330.
Lapalombara, J. G., & Hagan, C. B. (1951). Direct legislation: an appraisal and a suggestion. American Political Science Review
LeDuc, L. (2002). Referendums and initiatives: the politics of direct democracy. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing democracies 2. New challenges in the study of elections and voting. London: Sage.
Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review
Lupia, A. (1992). Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information. American Political Science Review
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review
Lupia, A., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). Direct democracy: new approaches to old questions. Annual Review of Political Science
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magleby, D. (1984). Direct legislation: voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Matsusaka, J. G. (1995). Explaining voter turnout patterns: an information theory. Public Choice
Matsusaka, J. G. (2005). Direct democracy works. Journal of Economic Perspectives
Mueller, J. E. (1969). Voting on the propositions: ballot patterns and historical trends in California. American Political Science Review
Nicholson, S. P. (2003). The political environment and ballot proposal awareness. American Journal of Political Science
Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. American Political Science Review
Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2005). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station: Stata Press.
Rasbash, J., & Goldstein, H. (1994). Efficient analysis of mixed hierarchical and cross-classified random structures using a multilevel model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19, 337–350.
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Shepsle, K. A. (1972). The strategy of ambiguity. American Political Science Review
Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Reasoning and choice. Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tolbert, C. J., McNeal, R., & Smith, D. A. (2003). Enhancing civic engagement: the effect of direct democracy on political participation and knowledge. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3, 23–41.
Yatchew, A., & Griliches, Z. (1985). Specification error in probit models. Review of Economics and Statistics
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.