Changing minds? Not in Congress!
- Keith T. Poole
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper shows a variety of evidence that members of Congress are ideologically consistent. Based upon the roll call voting record, once elected to Congress, members adopt a consistent ideological position and maintain it over time. There may be changing minds, but they are not in Congress.
- Cahoon, L.S., Hinich, M.J., Ordeshook, P.C. (1976). A Multidimensional Statistical Procedure for Spatial Analysis. Manuscript. Carnegie-Mellon University.
- Carmines, E.G., Stimson, J.A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Clausen, A. (1974). How Congressmen decide: A policy focus. New York: St. Martin's Press.
- Clinton, J., Jackman, S.D., Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98, 355–370. CrossRef
- Converse, P.E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in Mass publics. In D.E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.
- Cox, G.W., Katz, J.N. (2002). Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. New York: Cambridge.
- Cox, G.W., Poole, K.T. (2002a). On measuring partisanship in roll call voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 477–489. CrossRef
- Cox, G.W., Poole, K.T. (2002b). Measuring Group Differences in Roll Call Voting. Manuscript, University of Houston.
- DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans' social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102, 690–755. CrossRef
- Enelow, J.M., Hinich, M. (1984). The spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Evans, J.H. (2003). Have Americans' attitudes become more polarized? An update. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 71–90. CrossRef
- Fenno, R.F. Jr. (1978). Home style: House Members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Fiorina, M.P. (2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
- Froman, L.A. Jr. (1971). Differences between the House and Senate. In R. Wolfinger (Ed.), Readings on Congress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Glazer, A., Robbins, M. (1983). Voters and roll call voting: The effect of congressional elections. Political Behavior, 5, 377–390. CrossRef
- Heckman, J.J., Snyder, J.M. (1997). Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. Rand Journal of Economics, 28, 142–189. CrossRef
- Hinich, M.J., Munger, M.J. (1994). Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
- Hinich, M.J., Munger, M. (1997). Analytical politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hinich, M.J., Pollard, W. (1981). A new approach to the spatial theory of electoral competition. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 323–341. CrossRef
- Hoffer, E. (1951). The true believer: Thoughts on the nature of mass movements. New York: Harper Row (Perennial Library Edition, 1966, 1989).
- Jackman, S.D. (2000a). Estimation and Inference via Bayesian simulation: An introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 375–404. CrossRef
- Jackman, S.D. (2000b). Estimation and inference are ‘Missing Data’ problems: Unifying social science statistics via Bayesian simulation. Political Analysis, 8, 307–332.
- Jackman, S.D. (2001). Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via Bayesian simulation: Identification, estimation, inference and model checking. Political Analysis, 9, 227–241.
- Jacobson, G.C. (2006). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York: Pearson Longman.
- Kernell, S. (1973). Is the Senate more liberal than the House? Journal of Politics, 35, 332–363. CrossRef
- King, D. (1998). Party competition and polarization in American politics. Paper prepared for the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
- Krehbiel, K. (1993). Where's the party? British Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 235–266. CrossRef
- Loomis, M. (1995). Constituent influences outside the structure of spatial voting. Doctoral Dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University.
- McCarty, N.M., Poole, K.T. (1995). Veto power and legislation: An empirical analysis of executive and legislative bargaining from 1961–1986. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 282–312.
- McCarty, N.M., Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (1997). Income redistribution and the realignment of American politics. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
- McCarty, N.M., Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (2001). The Hunt for party discipline in congress. The American Political Science Review, 95, 673–687.
- McCarty, N.M., Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Nokken, T.P. (2000). Dynamics of congressional loyalty: Party defection and roll call behavior, 1947–1997. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 417–444. CrossRef
- Ordeshook, P.C. (1976). The spatial theory of elections: A review and a critique. In I. Budge, I. Crewe, D. Farlie (Eds.), Party identification and beyond. New York: Wiley.
- Poole, K.T. (1990). Least squares metric, unidimensional scaling of multivariate linear models. Psychometrika, 55, 123–149. CrossRef
- Poole, K.T. (1998). Recovering a basic space from a set of issue scales. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 954–993. CrossRef
- Poole, K.T. (2000). Non-parametric unfolding of binary choice data. Political Analysis, 8, 211–237.
- Poole, K.T. (2001). The geometry of multidimensional quadratic utility in models of parliamentary roll call voting. Political Analysis, 9, 211–226.
- Poole, K.T. (2005). Spatial models of parliamentary voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (1984). The polarization of American politics. Journal of Politics, 46, 1061–1079. CrossRef
- Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (2001). D-NOMINATE after 10 years: A comparative update to congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 5–26. CrossRef
- Rothenberg, L.S., Sanders, M.S. (2000). Severing the electoral connection: Shirking in the contemporary congress. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 316–325. CrossRef
- Snyder, J.M. Jr., Groseclose, T. (2000). Estimating party influence in congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 193–211. CrossRef
- Stratmann, T. (2000). Congressional voting over legislative careers: Shifting positions and changing constraints. American Political Science Review, 94, 665–676. CrossRef
- Weisberg, H.F. (1968). Dimensional analysis of legislative roll calls. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
- Wills, G. (1982). The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. New York: Bantam Books.
- Changing minds? Not in Congress!
Volume 131, Issue 3-4 , pp 435-451
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Optimal Classification
- Industry Sectors
- Keith T. Poole (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0521, USA