Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conduct an empirical analysis of data relating measures of economic and political freedom to the occurrence of transnational terrorism 1996–2002. We use binary logistical regression models to predict the probablities that a country will experience transnational terrorist attacks and that a given terrorist originates in a particular country. We find that the extent of political rights and civil liberties is negatively related with the generation of transnational terrorists from a country, but where the former is also negatively related with the occurrence of transnational terrorism in a country, the latter exhibits a non-linear relationship. A number of alternative explanations are disconfirmed: transnational terrorism is unrelated to inequality, economic growth, education, poverty, etc., while a society's fractionalization has mixed importance, and the religious composition has no or little association with attracting or producing transnational terrorism. A more trade-oriented economy seems consistently to associate with smaller probabilities of a country experiencing and generating transnational terrorism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadie, A. (2004). Poverty, political freedom, and the roots of terrorism. NBER Working Paper No. 10859. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Easterly, W., Devleeschauwer, A., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1980). Rent-seeking and profit-seeking. In: J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society, (pp. 3–15). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, N., & Crain, W.M. (2006). Terrorized economies. Public Choice, This volume.

  • Davis, G.G. (2004). Repression, rationality and relative deprivation: a theoretical and empirical examination of cross-national variations in political violence. Fairfax: Department of Economics, George Mason University, Mimeo, MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNardo, J. (1985). Powers in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakos, K., & Gofas, A. (2005). Data thinning and the correlation between democracy and transnational terrorism: opening the black-box of under-reporting bias. Patras: University of Patras (Working paper).

  • Finney, L.D. (1987). A rational choice theory of revolution and political violence. Unpublished dissertation. Ph.D. University of Maryland, College Park.

  • Fraser Institute (2002). Economic freedom of the world 1975–2001, Excel data set.

  • Freedom House (2004). Freedom in the world. Excel data set, http://www.freedomhouse.org.

  • Frey, B.S., & Luechinger, S. (2003). Measuring terrorism. IEW Working paper 171. Zürich: Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zürich.

  • Frohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J.A. (1974). The carrot and the stick: optimal program mixes for entrepreneurial political leaders. Public Choice, 19(Fall), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T.R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J.D., & Lawson, R. (2003). The concept and measurement of economic freedom. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 405–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J.D., & Lawson, R. (2004). Economic freedom of the World: 2004 annual report. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J.D., Lawson, R., & Block, W. (1996). Economic freedom of the World: 1975–95. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J.D., Lawson, R., & Gartzke, E. (2005). Economic freedom of the World: 2005 annual report. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2002). Penn World Table Version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP), October 2002, excel data set + codebook.

  • Kirk, R. (1983). Political terrorism and the size of government: a positive institutional analysis of violent political activity. Public Choice, 40(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotowski, C.M. (1984). Revolution. In: G. Sartori (Ed.), Social science concepts: a systematic analysis, (pp. 403–451). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (1997). Rational choice, collective action and the paradox of rebellion. Copenhagen: Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen & Copenhagen Political Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2004). The paradox of rebellion. In: C.K. Rowley, & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice, vol. 2, (pp. 403–406). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2005). Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M.I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M.I. (1995). The rebel's dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M.I., & Gurr, T.R. (1981). The conflict process: A formal model. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M.G., & Jaggers, K. (2002). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002. Data set and codebook, http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/.

  • McCormick, G.H. (2003). Terrorist decision making. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 473–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickolous, E.F., Sandler, T., & Murdock, J.M. (2003). International Terrorism: Attributes of Terrorist Events, 1968–2003 (ITERATE). Dunn Loring: Vinyard Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E.N., & Weede, E. (1990). Cross-national variation in political violence: A rational action approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34(4), 624–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, G.L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceputalizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative ideas. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971 [1965]). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathbone, A., & Rowley, C.K. (2002). Terrorism. Public Choice, 111, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosendorff, B.P., & Sandler, T. (2005). The political economy of transnational terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R.J. (1984). Libertarianism, violence within states, and the polarity principle. Comparative Politics, 16, 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R.J. (1985). Libertarian propositions on violence within and between nations: A test against published research results. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29(3), 419–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R.J. (1995). Statistics of democide. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R.J. (2001). Saving lives, enriching life: Freedom as a right and a moral good. Manuscript, http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/rummel/.

  • Shughart, W.F. (2002). September 11, 2001. Public Choice, 111, 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A.D. (1955 [1856]). The old regime and the French revolution. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1971). The paradox of revolution. Public Choice, 11, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1974). The social dilemma: The economics of war and revolution. Blacksburg: Center for Study of Public Choice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (2004 [1967]). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. In: C.K. Rowley (Ed.), Virginia political economy, The selected works of Gordon Tullock, Vol. 1, pp. 169–179. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (2005). The rent-seeking society. In: C. K. Rowley (Ed.), The selected works of Gordon Tullock, Vol. 5. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1996–2004). Human Development Report. www.undp.org.

  • U.S. State Department (1996–2003). Patterns of Global Terrorism (1996–2003). http://www.state.gov/s/ct /rls/pgtrpt/.

  • World Bank. World Development Indicators. CD-ROM and Online, Washington.

  • World Christian Database (2005). http://www.worldchristiandatabase.org/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard.

Additional information

An earlier version was presented at the Public Choice conference on The Political Economy of Terrorism, George Mason University, 24–25 May 2005, and we owe thanks for comments to the participants in that event.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurrild-Klitgaard, P., Justesen, M.K. & Klemmensen, R. The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism. Public Choice 128, 289–315 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9055-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9055-7

Keywords

Navigation