Abstract
We conduct an empirical analysis of data relating measures of economic and political freedom to the occurrence of transnational terrorism 1996–2002. We use binary logistical regression models to predict the probablities that a country will experience transnational terrorist attacks and that a given terrorist originates in a particular country. We find that the extent of political rights and civil liberties is negatively related with the generation of transnational terrorists from a country, but where the former is also negatively related with the occurrence of transnational terrorism in a country, the latter exhibits a non-linear relationship. A number of alternative explanations are disconfirmed: transnational terrorism is unrelated to inequality, economic growth, education, poverty, etc., while a society's fractionalization has mixed importance, and the religious composition has no or little association with attracting or producing transnational terrorism. A more trade-oriented economy seems consistently to associate with smaller probabilities of a country experiencing and generating transnational terrorism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abadie, A. (2004). Poverty, political freedom, and the roots of terrorism. NBER Working Paper No. 10859. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Alesina, A., Easterly, W., Devleeschauwer, A., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194.
Buchanan, J.M. (1980). Rent-seeking and profit-seeking. In: J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society, (pp. 3–15). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Crain, N., & Crain, W.M. (2006). Terrorized economies. Public Choice, This volume.
Davis, G.G. (2004). Repression, rationality and relative deprivation: a theoretical and empirical examination of cross-national variations in political violence. Fairfax: Department of Economics, George Mason University, Mimeo, MS.
DeNardo, J. (1985). Powers in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Drakos, K., & Gofas, A. (2005). Data thinning and the correlation between democracy and transnational terrorism: opening the black-box of under-reporting bias. Patras: University of Patras (Working paper).
Finney, L.D. (1987). A rational choice theory of revolution and political violence. Unpublished dissertation. Ph.D. University of Maryland, College Park.
Fraser Institute (2002). Economic freedom of the world 1975–2001, Excel data set.
Freedom House (2004). Freedom in the world. Excel data set, http://www.freedomhouse.org.
Frey, B.S., & Luechinger, S. (2003). Measuring terrorism. IEW Working paper 171. Zürich: Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zürich.
Frohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J.A. (1974). The carrot and the stick: optimal program mixes for entrepreneurial political leaders. Public Choice, 19(Fall), 43–61.
Gurr, T.R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gwartney, J.D., & Lawson, R. (2003). The concept and measurement of economic freedom. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 405–430.
Gwartney, J.D., & Lawson, R. (2004). Economic freedom of the World: 2004 annual report. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
Gwartney, J.D., Lawson, R., & Block, W. (1996). Economic freedom of the World: 1975–95. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
Gwartney, J.D., Lawson, R., & Gartzke, E. (2005). Economic freedom of the World: 2005 annual report. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2002). Penn World Table Version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP), October 2002, excel data set + codebook.
Kirk, R. (1983). Political terrorism and the size of government: a positive institutional analysis of violent political activity. Public Choice, 40(1), 41–52.
Kotowski, C.M. (1984). Revolution. In: G. Sartori (Ed.), Social science concepts: a systematic analysis, (pp. 403–451). London: Sage.
Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (1997). Rational choice, collective action and the paradox of rebellion. Copenhagen: Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen & Copenhagen Political Studies Press.
Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2004). The paradox of rebellion. In: C.K. Rowley, & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice, vol. 2, (pp. 403–406). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Li, Q. (2005). Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 278–297.
Lichbach, M.I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266–297.
Lichbach, M.I. (1995). The rebel's dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lichbach, M.I., & Gurr, T.R. (1981). The conflict process: A formal model. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 3–29.
Marshall, M.G., & Jaggers, K. (2002). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002. Data set and codebook, http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/.
McCormick, G.H. (2003). Terrorist decision making. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 473–507.
Mickolous, E.F., Sandler, T., & Murdock, J.M. (2003). International Terrorism: Attributes of Terrorist Events, 1968–2003 (ITERATE). Dunn Loring: Vinyard Software.
Muller, E.N., & Weede, E. (1990). Cross-national variation in political violence: A rational action approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34(4), 624–651.
Munck, G.L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceputalizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative ideas. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34.
Olson, M. (1971 [1965]). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48, 3–25.
Rathbone, A., & Rowley, C.K. (2002). Terrorism. Public Choice, 111, 1–10.
Rosendorff, B.P., & Sandler, T. (2005). The political economy of transnational terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 171–182.
Rummel, R.J. (1984). Libertarianism, violence within states, and the polarity principle. Comparative Politics, 16, 443–462.
Rummel, R.J. (1985). Libertarian propositions on violence within and between nations: A test against published research results. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29(3), 419–455.
Rummel, R.J. (1995). Statistics of democide. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Rummel, R.J. (2001). Saving lives, enriching life: Freedom as a right and a moral good. Manuscript, http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/rummel/.
Shughart, W.F. (2002). September 11, 2001. Public Choice, 111, 11–18.
Tocqueville, A.D. (1955 [1856]). The old regime and the French revolution. New York: Doubleday.
Tullock, G. (1971). The paradox of revolution. Public Choice, 11, 89–100.
Tullock, G. (1974). The social dilemma: The economics of war and revolution. Blacksburg: Center for Study of Public Choice.
Tullock, G. (2004 [1967]). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. In: C.K. Rowley (Ed.), Virginia political economy, The selected works of Gordon Tullock, Vol. 1, pp. 169–179. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Tullock, G. (2005). The rent-seeking society. In: C. K. Rowley (Ed.), The selected works of Gordon Tullock, Vol. 5. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
UNDP (1996–2004). Human Development Report. www.undp.org.
U.S. State Department (1996–2003). Patterns of Global Terrorism (1996–2003). http://www.state.gov/s/ct /rls/pgtrpt/.
World Bank. World Development Indicators. CD-ROM and Online, Washington.
World Christian Database (2005). http://www.worldchristiandatabase.org/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version was presented at the Public Choice conference on The Political Economy of Terrorism, George Mason University, 24–25 May 2005, and we owe thanks for comments to the participants in that event.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurrild-Klitgaard, P., Justesen, M.K. & Klemmensen, R. The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism. Public Choice 128, 289–315 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9055-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9055-7