Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flat earth economics and site-specific crop management: how flat is flat?

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The practical significance of achieving optimality in on-farm decision making has been debated in the agricultural economics literature since the 1950s, with some arguing that optimal input application is less critical if farmers are faced with a flat pay-off function. This issue has considerable implications for the adoption of site-specific crop management (SSCM), where the optimal management of inputs across space is emphasised. This paper contributes to this debate by addressing some previously unresolved issues. Firstly, a new metric is proposed, termed ‘relative curvature’ (RC), that is used for more accurate and versatile quantification of the flatness of pay-off functions. Secondly, this metric is used to compare the difference in profitability between management classes within the same field, where SSCM is practiced. Thirdly, the RC metric is used to examine the effect of considering environmental damage costs from non-optimal input application on the flatness of pay-off functions. The key findings of this paper are that there exists a high degree of variability in relative curvature of pay-off functions derived for different management classes within the same field. The RC procedure can be used to identify fields which are most suitable to variable-rate management intervention. Also, RC increases substantially when environmental costs are accounted for, implying that optimality of input use may be more important than previously thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. More generally, the interval of input values can be defined as [z,\( \hat{x} \)], such that \( z \ge 0 \).

  2. Obviously, if comparison of other fields with respect to the same input, or another input are made, the value of \( \hat{x} \) will change. All that is required is consistency of this value within a given comparison.

References

  • Anderson, J. (1975). One more or less cheer for optimality. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 41, 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U., & Kneese, A. V. (1969). Production, consumption, and externalities. The American Economic Review, 59, 282–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, B. A., & Pautsch, G. R. (1998). Moving from uniform to variable fertilizer rates on Iowa corn: effects on rates and returns. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23, 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. E., & Burke, I. C. (2000). Potential nitrogen immobilization in grassland soils across a soil organic matter gradient. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 32, 1707–1716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, P. H. T., & Webster, R. (1971). Soil variability: a review. Soils and Fertilisers, 34, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni, R., & Lowenberg-Deboer, J. (2004). Precision agriculture and sustainability. Precision Agriculture, 5, 359–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boydell, B., & McBratney, A. B. (2002). Identifying potential within-field management zones from cotton yield estimates. Precision Agriculture, 3, 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, N. J., Whitmore, A. P., Hart, P. B. S., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1993). Modelling the fate of nitrogen in crop and soil in the years following application of 15N-labelled fertilizer to winter wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 121, 363–379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, D. G., Bullock, D. S., Nafziger, E. D., Doerge, T. A., Paszkiewicz, S. R., Carter, P. R., et al. (1998). Does variable rate seeding of corn pay? Agronomy Journal, 90, 830–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman, K. G. (1999). Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 5952–5959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. E., & Bramley, R. G. V. (1998). Precision agriculture; opportunities, benefits and pitfalls of site-specific crop management in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 38, 753–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. L. (1977). The analysis of response in crop and livestock production. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, E. O., & Pesek, J. (1954). A fertiliser production surface. Journal of Farm Economics, 36, 466–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, R., & Thorne, D. (1955). Review notes on the Heady-Pesek fertilizer production surface. Journal of Farm Economics, 37, 117–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iho, A., & Laukkanen, M. (2012). Precision phosphorus management and agricultural phosphorus loading. Ecological Economics, 77, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, R. (1975). Two cheers for optimality. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 41, 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney, A., Whelan, B., Ancev, T., & Bouma, J. (2005). Future directions of precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 6, 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell, D. J. (2006). Flat-earth economics: the far-reaching consequences of flat payoff functions in economic decision making. Review of Agricultural Economics, 28, 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, P. C. (1993). Characterisation of soil conditions at the field level for soil specific management. Geoderma, 60, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryther, J. H., & Dunstan, W. M. (1971). Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in the coastal marine environment. Science, 171, 1008–1013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. A., McBratney, A. B., & Whelan, B. M. (2007). Establishing management classes for broadacre agricultural production. Agronomy Journal, 99, 1366–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaso, J. M. D. (1995). Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through the manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Science, 43, 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Blottnitz, H., Rabl, A., Boiadjiev, D., Taylor, T., & Arnold, S. (2006). Damage costs of nitrogen fertilizer in Europe and their internalization. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49, 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Prato, T., Qiu, Z., Kitchen, N., & Sudduth, K. (2003). Economic and environmental evaluation of variable rate nitrogen and lime application for claypan soil fields. Precision Agriculture, 4, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, B.M. & Taylor, J.A. (2005). Local response to nitrogen inputs: advancing SSCM within Australia. In Stafford, J. V. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (pp. 865–872). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.

  • Whelan, B. M., Taylor, J. A., & McBratney, A. B. (2012). A ‘small strip’ approach to empirically determining management class yield response functions and calculating potential financial ‘net wastage’ associated with whole-field uniform-rate fertiliser application. Field Crops Research, 139, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., Wang, M., & Wang, N. (2002). Precision agriculture—a worldwide overview. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 36, 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, University of Sydney, Biomedical Building, 1 Central Avenue, Australian Technology Park, Eveleigh, NSW, 2015, Australia

    Andrew Rogers, Tiho Ancev & Brett Whelan

Authors
  1. Andrew Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiho Ancev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brett Whelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett Whelan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogers, A., Ancev, T. & Whelan, B. Flat earth economics and site-specific crop management: how flat is flat?. Precision Agric 17, 108–120 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-015-9410-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-015-9410-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation