Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The economic and environmental impacts of precision agriculture and interactions with agro-environmental policy

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A whole-farm model was used to investigate the interacting effects of precision agriculture technology and agro-environmental policy on the production choices of a representative grain farm. Although some precision agriculture technologies did increase efficiency of resource use, they also decreased the effectiveness of policy, especially policies that rely on economic incentives (e.g., emission taxes). Precision agriculture can lead to higher marginal abatement costs in the form of forgone profits, decreasing producers’ responsiveness to those policies. Policy-makers targeting pollution reductions from agriculture should take into account the increasing use of precision agriculture techniques and their varying effects on agro-environmental policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASC:

Automatic section control

DSSAT:

Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer

EU:

European Union

GPS:

Global Positioning System

RTK:

Real-time kinematic auto-steer

US:

United States

VRA:

Variable rate application

References

  • Berry, J., Delgado, J., Khosla, R., & Pierce, F. (2003). Precision conservation for environmental sustainability. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 58(6), 332–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni, R., & Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2004). Precision agriculture and sustainability. Precision Agriculture, 5(4), 359–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrato, M. E., & Blackmer, A. M. (1990). Comparisons of models for describing corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal, 82(1), 138–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2010). The EU Nitrates Directive. Publications Office, European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/factsheets/nitrates.pdf.

  • Goulder, L. H., & Parry, I. W. H. (2008). Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halich, G. (2009). Corn and soybean budgets (2009). Lexington: University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, J., Ebel, R., & Udea, K. (2010). “No-till” farming is a growing practice. Economic Information Bulletin No. 70. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

  • Keohane, N. O., Revesz, R. L., & Stavins, R. N. (1998). The choice of regulatory instruments in environmental policy. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 22, 313–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2004). Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International, 30(7), 981–990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Statistics Service Kentucky Field Office. (2011). Kentucky Agricultural Statistics 2010–2011 Bulletin. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2003). Cost heterogeneity and the potential savings from market-based policies. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. (2008). Kentucky Farm Business Management Program: Annual Summary Data 2008. Lexington: University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. P., & Swinton, S. (2005). Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: a grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(1), 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieffer, J. K., & Dillon, C. R. (2013). Precision agriculture and agro-environmental policy. In J. V. Stafford (Ed.), Precision agriculture ‘13 (pp. 755–760). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. P., DeJoia, A. J., Ferguson, R. B., Taylor, R. K., Young, R. K., & Havlin, J. L. (2002). Corn yield response to nitrogen at multiple in-field locations. Agronomy Journal, 94(4), 798–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, U., & Kumar, P. (2008). Greenhouse gas mitigation through agriculture. Choices, 23(1), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shockley, J. M., Dillon, C. R., & Stombaugh, T. (2011). A whole farm analysis of the influence of auto-steer navigation on net returns, risk and production practices. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 43(1), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shockley, J. M., Dillon, C. R., Stombaugh, T., & Shearer, S. (2012). Whole farm analysis of automatic section control for agricultural machinery. Precision Agriculture, 13(4), 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stombaugh, T.S., McLaren, D., & Koostra, B. (2005). The global positioning system. Lexington: University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service. (Technical Bulletin No. AEN-88).

  • University of Kentucky. (2008). UKAg Weather Center. Climate data for Henderson County, 1978–2007. http://www.agwx.ca.uky.edu/ Accessed 22 Sept 2014.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA). (2009). National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress, 2004 Reporting Cycle (EPA 841-R-08-001). Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.

  • World Agricultural Outlook Board. (2013). World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. (Technical Bulletin No. WASDE-523).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Schieffer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schieffer, J., Dillon, C. The economic and environmental impacts of precision agriculture and interactions with agro-environmental policy. Precision Agric 16, 46–61 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-014-9382-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-014-9382-5

Keywords

Navigation