Skip to main content
Log in

Regulatory Reform at a Critical Time: the Case of the Republic of Korea

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the Korean case of regulatory reform in pursuit of a drastic transformation from an economy with a high degree of government intervention into a market-driven economy at a critical time of economic crisis. The Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) is a main vehicle for conducting regulatory reform; it consists of a civilian majority under the co-chairmanship of the Prime Minister and a civilian chair, which is effective in linking the administrative authority with civilian experts for collaborative reform work. Successful reform depends on reform leadership to overwhelm opposition and resistance from interest groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, M. S. (2002). Regulatory policy and national development in Korea. Journal of Governmental Studies, 8(2), 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, K., & Swann, D. (1989). The age of regulatory reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B. S. (1992). A theory on government regulation. Seoul: Bubmoon-Sa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. Y. (2004). A study on institutional arrangements and operating rules of regulatory reform in Korea: In comparison between the Presidential Commission on Administrative Reform and the Regulatory Reform Committee, Doctoral Dissertation, Korea University.

  • Choi, D. Y., & Kim, H. J. (2014). The regulatory reform system and policy coordination in Korea: A guillotine rule of regulatory clearance for economic crisis management. Seoul: KDI School of Public Policy and Management and the Ministry of Strategy and Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsiaficas, G. (2012). Asia’s unknown uprisings: South Korean social movements in the 20th century. Oakland: PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. S. (1998). Administrative reform in the Korean central government. Public Performance and Management Review, 24(2), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T.-Y. (2003). An evaluation of regulatory reform of the Kim Dae-Jung administration: the focus on the regulatory reform governance. Journal of Regulation Studies, 12(1), 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1997a). Regulatory impact analysis: Best practices in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1997b). OECD report on regulatory reform: Synthesis. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2000). OECD review of regulatory reform: Regulatory reform in Korea. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) (1999). White paper on regulatory reform in 1998. Seoul: Regulatory Reform Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tcha, M. J. (2005). Regulatory reforms to improve business environment, KDI Report 2005–8. Seoul: Korea Development Institute.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pan Suk Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, D., Kim, P.S. Regulatory Reform at a Critical Time: the Case of the Republic of Korea. Public Organiz Rev 17, 315–334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0355-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0355-1

Keywords

Navigation