Skip to main content
Log in

Getting the Fundamentals Right: Autonomization as a Reform and Governance Tool in the Case of the State Insurance Company Ltd. (SIC) in Ghana

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article is primarily a case study of the use of autonomization in the reform and restructuring of the State Insurance Company Ltd, an SOE in Ghana and addresses two main questions. (1) In view of the fact that the SIC has dual commercial and political objectives, is autonomization suitable for its reform? (2) Under what circumstances can autonomization actually promote efficiency and effectiveness in the proper management and functioning of the SIC? The findings point to answers for both questions. First, autonomization is a defective tool for reforming politically sensitive SOEs but better for non-politically sensitive ones. Secondly, the results point to genuine concerns that autonomization weakens the bonds of political accountability and increases fragmentation of government programs. Finally, the key words in the adoption and implementation of autonomization ought to be context, agency task-specificity and creative adaptation. It adds to the management literature on sub-Saharan Africa and to understanding the management context of Ghana.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These are agencies whose power and authority transcend government agencies and departments, and have central coordinating roles.

References

  • Adjei, S. (2006). Governance, state-ownership and divestiture: the Ghanaian experience. African Journal of Public Administration and Administration, 17(2), 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah-Kubi, K. (1999). State-owned enterprises and privatization in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 2(39), 179–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, P., & Heintzman, R. (2000). The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform. International Review of the Administrative Science, 66(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2009). Understanding public management and governance. In B. Tony & L. Elke (Eds.), Public management and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozec, R., & Dia, M. (2007). Board structure and firm technical efficiency: evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1734–1750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozec, R., Zeghal, D., & Boujenoui, A. (2004). The effect of the reform of Canadian state-owned enterprises on major corporate governance mechanisms. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(2), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozec, R., Dia, M., & Bozec, Y. (2010). Governance-performance relationship: a re-examination using technical efficiency measures. British Journal of Management, 21, 684–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broussine, M. (2009). Public leadership. In T. Bovaird & E. Löffler (Eds.), Public management and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield, J. (2004). New public management in a developing country: Creating executive agencies in Tanzania. In P. Christopher & T. Colin (Eds.), Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J. G. (1999). Bureaucratic autonomy as a political asset. Paper Presented at the workshop, Politicians, Bureaucrats and Institutional Reform, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Mannheim, March 26–31.

  • Christensen, J. G. (2001). Bureaucratic autonomy as a political asset. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicians, bureaucrats and administrative reform. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Autonomization and policy capacity: The dillemas and challanges facing political executives. In M. Painter & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to state capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives. Palgrave: Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Danso, A. (2008). Privatization of state owned enterprises in africa: the case of Ghana. South-Eastern Political Review, 20(2), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. (2009). Ethics and standards of conduct. In T. Bovaird & E. Löffler (Eds.), Public management and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzorgbo, D. B. S. (2001). Ghana in search of development: The challenge of governance, economic management and institution building. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erridge, A. (2009). Contracting for public services. In T. Bovaird & E. Löffler (Eds.), Public management and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, D. G., & Frederickson, G. H. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Washington D. C: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gains, F. (2004). Adapting the agency concept: Variations within ‘next steps. In P. Christopher & T. Colin (Eds.), Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyimah-Boadi, E. (1991). State enterprises divestiture: Recent Ghanaian experiences. In D. Rothchild (Ed.), Ghana: The political economy of recovery. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy analysis and policy subsystems (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G. (1999). Governance in the 21st century: restoring legitimacy to public authority. African Journal of Public Administration and Management, 11(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernaghan, K., & Siegel, D. (1999). Public administration in Canada: A text (4th ed.). Toronto: ITP Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larbi, G. (1998). Management decentralization in practice: A comparison of public health and water services in Ghana. In M. Martin, P. Charles, & H. David (Eds.), Beyond the New public management: Changing ideas and practices in governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larbi, G. (2001). Performance contracting in practice: experience and lessons from the water sector in Ghana. Public Management Review, 3(3), 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larbi, G. (2005). Freedom to manage, task networks and institutional environment of decentralized service organizations in developing countries. International Journal of Administrative Sciences, 71(3), 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, E. (2010). Surveying the public administration landscape: Frameworks, narratives, and contours. In C. Dunn (Ed.), The handbook of Canadian public administration (2nd ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F. (1976). Introduction to management: A contingency approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Stewart, T. (1977). A general contingency theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2009). Engaging with citizens and other stakeholders. In T. Bovaird & E. Löffler (Eds.), Public management and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNabb, D. E. (2010). Case research in public management. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002). Distributed Public governance: agencies, authorities and other autonomous bodies, Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (2005a). Policy brief public sector modernization: open government. OECD Observer, 1–7.

  • OECD (2005b). Public sector modernization: modernizing accountability and control, OECD Policy Brief, 1–7.

  • Olowu, D. (2002). Governance, institutional reforms and policy processes in africa: Research and capacity-building implications. In O. Dele & S. Soumana (Eds.), Better governance and public policy: Capacity building for democratic renewal in africa. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2000). Introduction: Understanding governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority. Steering and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., & Peters, G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (2004). Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How governments Get things done through semi-autonomous organizations. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement-accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman, A. S., Lawrence, S., & Roper, J. (2004). Social and environmental reporting at the VRA: institutionalised legitimacy or legitimate crisis? Critical Perspective on Accounting, 15, 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakyi, K. E. (2008). Implementing decentralized management in Ghana: the experience of the Sekyere west district health administration. Leadership in Health Services, 21(4), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, R. A., Jr., & Straits, B. C. (2010). Approaches to social research (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Enterprise Commission (1995). SOE reform program 1984–1994: review and recommendations for 1995–2000 SEC: Accra-Ghana.

  • State Insurance Company Ltd (2005). Report and financial statements 2005, Accra-Ghana.

  • State Insurance Company Ltd (2006). Reports and financial statements 2006, Accra-Ghana.

  • State Insurance Company Ltd (2007). Reports and financial statements 2007, Accra-Ghana.

  • State Insurance Company Ltd (2009). Annual reports and financial statements 2009, Accra-Ghana.

  • Uddin, S., & Tsamenyi, M. (2005). Public sector reforms and the public intrerest: a case study of accounting control changes and performance monitoring in a Ghanaian state owned enterprise. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(5), 648–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Thiel, S. (2004) Quangos in Dutch government. In C. Pollitt & C. Talbot (Eds.), Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Peters, B. G., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organizational autonomy: a conceptual review. Public Administration and Development, 24, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Rones, P., Bram, V., Rubecksen, K., & MacCarthaigh, M. C. (2010). Autonomy and control of state agencies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuere, B. (2007). The autonomy-control balance in Flemish Arm’s length public agencies. Public Management Review, 9(1), 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1995). Bureaucrats in business: The economics and politics of government ownership. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K. (2004). Agentification in Japan: Renaming or revolution. In C. Pollitt & C. Talbot (Eds.), Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesilkagit, K. (2004a). Bureaucratic autonomy, organizational culture and habituation. Administration and Society, 36(5), 528–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilkagit, K. (2004b). The design of public agencies: overcoming agency costs and commitment problems. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Jebuntie Zaato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaato, J.J. Getting the Fundamentals Right: Autonomization as a Reform and Governance Tool in the Case of the State Insurance Company Ltd. (SIC) in Ghana. Public Organiz Rev 16, 391–408 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0316-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0316-0

Keywords

Navigation