Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Performance Audit on Public Sector Organizations: The Case of Estonia

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of a survey of 118 Estonian public officials show that auditees can perceive performance audit to be useful even if it does not lead to specific changes in policies or organizational practices. No trade-off between the accountability and improvement functions of performance audit could be observed, though a surprisingly low percentage of the respondents considered performance audit to have been used to hold the audited organization accountable for their actions. While the factors internal to the audit process – including the perceived expertise of the auditors, their openness to dialogue with the auditees and the quality of audit report – influenced the perceived usefulness of the audit, they had less bearing on the adoption of changes by the audited organizations. The study indicates that when parliamentarians pay attention to performance audit and when media attention leads to political debate, the adoption of changes recommended by the performance audit report is more likely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For an overview of the existing studies on the impacts of PA, see Van Loocke and Put (2011).

  2. Among the 118 respondents, 75 completed the full survey and 43completed it partially.

  3. The same result was found in Reichborn-Kjennerud (2013a) .

References

  • Alwardat, Y.A. (2010). External auditors and clients: an investigation of perceptions of value for money (VfM) Audit Aractices in the UK Public Sector. PhD thesis, University of Westminster, Harrow Business School, London.

  • Behn, R. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Lonsdale, J., & Perrin, B. (2007). Making accountability work. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J., Taylor, S., & Van Gaalen, R. (1987). Politicians, bureaucrats and asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 796–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Craft, J. (1980). Auditing and public administration: the unrealized partnership. Public Administration Review, 40(3), 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: in search of mechanisms. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(3), 376–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funkhouser, M. (2011). Accountability, performance and performance auditing: reconciling the view of scholars and auditors. In J. Londsdale, P. Wilkins, & T. Ling (Eds.), Performance auditing: Contribution to accountability in democratic government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubo, J. E. (2011). Performance auditing: Audit or misnomer? In J. Lonsdale, P. Wilkins, & T. Ling (Eds.), Performance auditing: Contributing to accountability in democratic government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatherly, D. J., & Parker, L. D. (1988). Performance auditing outcomes: A comparative study. Financial Accountability & Management, 4(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justesen, L., & Skaerbek, P. (2010). Performance auditing and the narrating of a new auditee identity. Financial Accountability & Management, 3(26), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kells, S. (2011). The Seven deadly sins of performance auditing: implications for monitoring public audit institutions. Australian Accounting Review, 21(59), 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, I., & Pong, C. K. M. (2000). Modernization versus problematization: value-for- money audit in public services. The European Accounting Review, 9(4), 541–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, F. L. (2009). Evaluation: a booming business but is it adding value? Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 9(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, F. L. (2011). On the effects, lack of effects and perverse effects of performance audit. In J. Londsdale, P. Wilkins, & T. Ling (Eds.), Performance auditing: Contribution to accountability in democratic government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, J. (1999). Impacts. In C. Pollitt, X. Girre, J. Lonsdale, R. Mul, H. Summa & M. Waerness (Eds.), Performance or compliance? Performance audit and public management in five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lonsdale, J. (2000). Developments in value-for-money audits: impacts and implications. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, J. (2008). Balancing independence and responsiveness: a practitioner perspective on the relationships shaping performance audit. Evaluation, 14, 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, J. (2011). Introduction. In J. Lonsdale, P. Wilkins, & T. Ling (Eds.), Performance auditing: Contribution to accountability in democratic government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Lonsdale, J., & Bechberger, E. (2011). Learning in an accountability setting. In J. Lonsdale, P. Wilkins, & T. Ling (Eds.), Performance auditing: Contribution to accountability in democratic government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalised organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 739–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, D. (2001). Influence of value for money audit on public administrations: looking beyond appearances. Financial Accountability and Management, 17(2), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, D. (2003). Controllers or catalysts for change and improvement: would the real value for money auditors please stand up? Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, D. (2004). Measuring the impact of value- for- money audits: a model for surveying audited managers. Canadian Public Administration, 47(2), 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, D. (2008). Auditors general’s universe revisited. An exploratory study of the influence they exert on public administration through their value for money audits. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(7), 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, D. (2014). Auditors general’s impact on administrations: a Pan-Canadian study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(5), 395–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. (2006). What do we talk about when we talk about performance? dialogue theory and performance budgeting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. (2008a). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. (2008b). Advocacy and learning: An interactive-dialogue approach to performance information use. In W. Van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector: How it is used. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mc Millan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nõmm, K., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2012). Performance measurement and performance information in new democracies. Public Management Review, 14(7), 859–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Estonia: towards a single government approach. Assessment and recommendations. Accessible at: http://www.valitsus.ee/UserFiles/valitsus/et/riigikantselei/uldinfo/dokumendiregister/Uuringud/PGR_Estonia_A&R.pdf.

  • Pollitt, C., & Summa, H. (1996). Performance, audit and evaluation: similar tools, different relationships? New Directions for Evaluation, 71, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Summa, H. (1997). Reflexive watchdogs? How supreme audit institutions account for themselves. Public Administration, 75(2), 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H., & Waerness, M. (1999). Performance or compliance? Performance audit and public management in five countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: a comparative analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organizational learning mechanisms: a structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preskill, H., & Torres, R. (2000). The learning dimension of evaluation use. In V. Caracelli & H. Preskill (Eds.), The expanding scope of evaluation use. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven 30 years later. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 7(2), 217–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichborn-Kjennerud, K., & Johnsen, A. (2011). Auditors’ understanding of evidence: a performance audit of an urban development programme. Evaluation, 17(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. (2013a). Political accountability and performance audit: the case of the auditor general in Norway. Public Administration, 91(3), 680–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. (2013b). Resistance to control: Norwegian ministries’ and agencies’ reactions to performance audit. Forthcoming in Public Organization Review. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0247-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J. T. (Ed.). (1972). The social influence processes. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Meer, F. B. (1999). Evaluation and the social construction of impacts. Evaluation, 5(4), 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer, F.-B., & Edelenbos, J. (2006). Evaluation in multi- actor policy processes. Evaluation, 12(2), 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loocke, E., & Put, V. (2011). The impact of performance audits: A review of existing evidence. In J. Londsdale, P. Wilkins, & T. Ling (Eds.), Performance auditing: Contribution to accountability in democratic government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weets, K. (2011). Impact at local government level: A multiple case study. In J. Londsdale, P. Wilkins, & T. Ling (Eds.), Performance auditing: Contribution to accountability in democratic government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice- Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, P., & Lonsdale, J. (2007). Public sector auditing for accountability: New directions, new tricks? In M.-L. Bemelmans-Videc, J. Lonsdale, & B. Perrin (Eds.), Making accountability work: Dilemmas for evaluation and for audit. New Jersey: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia 3, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia

    Ringa Raudla, Külli Taro & Cherlin Agu

  2. Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA

    James W. Douglas

Authors
  1. Ringa Raudla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Külli Taro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cherlin Agu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James W. Douglas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ringa Raudla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raudla, R., Taro, K., Agu, C. et al. The Impact of Performance Audit on Public Sector Organizations: The Case of Estonia. Public Organiz Rev 16, 217–233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0308-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0308-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation