Date: 05 Oct 2010
Service Delivery Through E-Governance: Perception and Expectation of Customers in Fiji and PNG
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Empirical studies on e-governance are replete with evidences highlighting its potential for improving service delivery. This study was conducted in PNG and Fiji using structured questionnaires distributed to different groups of respondents. The results indicate that e-governance has the potential to improve Public Service Delivery. It is also confirmed through the findings in this research that the expectations of citizens from public services are quite high, but experience has often been negative i.e. there is a huge variance in the perception and expectation of normal citizens in PNG (Papua New Guinea) and Fiji regarding service delivery, quality of services.
ADB (2003). Poverty Discussion Paper as Presented to National Poverty Workshop Assessment of Hardship and Poverty: Strategies for Equitable Growth and Hardship Alleviation, Suva, Fiji. Mimeo.
ADB (2004). Governance in PNG: A cluster evaluation of three public sector reform activities. Evaluation and Review Series No. 35 July 2004. Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), Canberra, July 2004. Papua New Guinea National Assessment Report. Prepared for United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Commission for Sustainable Development.
Ahmed, M. (2004). E-governance initiatives in Bangladesh: An analysis of strategy formulation for reinventing good governance. Department of Business Administration, Jahangirnagar University, 2004, http://moshtaq.net/Papers/Strategies%20for%20eGovernance.htm.
Åkesson, M., & Edvardsson, B. (2008). Effects of e-government on service design as perceived by employees. Managing Service Quality, 18(5), 457–478.
Augus, A., Barker, S., & Kandampully, J. (2007). An exploratory study of service quality in the Malaysian public service sector. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(2), 177–190.CrossRef
Bassanini, F. (2003). Good governance strategies: A prospect for integration reflections from the Italian experience. Fifth Global Forum on Reinventing Government, Good Government Strategies for the 21st Century, Mexico, November 3–7.
Bhatnagar, S. (2002). E-government: lessons from implementation in developing countries. Regional Development Dialogue, UNCRD, 24, 1–9.
Bhatnagar, S. (2003). Administrative corruption: How does e-government help? Global Corruption Report 2003, Transparency International.
Bhatnagar, S. (2004). E-government: From vision to implementation: A practical guide with case studies. New Delhi: Sage.
Borwankar, M. C. (2004). The status of e-governance in Maharashtra: an exploratory study. Ashwattha, 4(2), April–June, http://www.yashada.org/.
Brady, M. K., & Cronin, J. J. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65, 34–49.CrossRef
Cho, Y. H., & Choi, B. D. (2004). E-government to combat corruption: the case of Seoul metropolitan government. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(10), 719–735.CrossRef
Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218.CrossRef
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free. New York: MacGraw Hill.
Dabholkar, P. A., Shepherd, D. C., & Thorpe, D. I. (2000). A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 139–173.CrossRef
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
Fuliya, R. R., & Bansal, G. S. (2005). Nai-Disha Eka Sewa Kendra (NDESK): improve service delivery in government. Journal of the Eighth National Conference on eGovernance, 54–57.
Gage, J. (2002). Some thoughts on How ICTs Could Really Change the World. In The Global Information Technology Report 2001–2002: Readiness for the Networked World, Harvard University: Center for International Development.
Gani, A., Nakagawa, H., Duncan, R., & Toatu, T. (2007). Good Governance Indicators for Seven Pacific Island Countries. Retrieved 21 March 12, 2008, http://www.usp.ac.fj/fileadmin/files/Institutes/piasdg/governance_papers/2007_Governance-Indicator.pdf.
Ghosh, A., & Arora, N. (2005). Role of e-governance frameworks in effective implementation. Lahore Pakistan: ICEG.
Gilbert, D., & Balestrini, P. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286–301.CrossRef
Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2007). E-government success: some principles from a Spanish case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(6), 845–861.CrossRef
Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its market implications. European Journal of marketing, 18(4), 36–44.CrossRef
Grönroos, C. (2007). Service management and marketing. Customer management in service competition. Chichester: Wiley.
Jones, S., Hackney, R., & Irani, Z. (2007). Towards e-government transformation: conceptualizing ’citizen engagement’ a research note. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(2), 145–152.CrossRef
Juran, J. M. (1988) Juran’s quality control handbook (4th Ed.), (pp. 4.9–4.12). McGraw-Hill.
Kang, H. B. (2001). Cleaning up the city government of Seoul: A systematic approach. The Anti-Corruption Symposium: The Role of On-line Procedures in Promoting Good Governance, Seoul Institute for Transparency, Seoul, p. 43, August 30–31.
Kašubienė, L., & Vanagas, P. (2007). Assumptions of e-government services quality evaluation. Engineering Economics, 5(55), 68–74.
Kavanamur, D., & Okole, H. (2004). Understanding Reform in Papua New Guinea: An Analytical Evaluation. Port Moresby: Institute of National Affairs.
Kavanamur, D., Okole, H., Manning, M., & Lavantis, T. (2004). Understanding reform in Papua New Guinea: An analytical evaluation. A study commissioned by the Global Development Network (Washington DC) and the Foundation for Development Cooperation (Brisbane). Retrieved April 3, 2010 from http://pngccs.org/media/pdfs/PNG-Understanding-Reform.pdf.
Laffont, J.-J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The theory of incentives. The principal-agent model. New York: Princeton University Press.
Lagrosen, S., & Lagrosen, Y. (2003). Management of service quality – differences in values, practices and outcomes. Managing Service Quality, 13(5), 370–81.CrossRef
Lane, J. E. (2003). Public principals and their agents. Retrieved 4 May, 2005, http://www.spp.nus.edu.sg/docs/wp/wp32.pdf.
MORI. (2002). Public service reform: Measuring and understanding customer satisfaction. Retrieved 4 May, 2005, www.ipsos-mori.com/publications/rd/opsr.pdf.
Naz, R., Pathak, R. D., Rahman, M. H., Agarwal, K. N., & Smith, R. F. I. (2006). The potential for using IT to cut corruption in service delivery: a case study of services to farmers in Fiji. International Journal of Effective Management, 3(1), 39–52.
Page, T. J., & Spreng, R. A. (2002). Difference scores versus direct effects in service quality measurement. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 184–192.CrossRef
Pan, S. L., Tan, C. W., & Lim, E. T. K. (2006). Customer relationship management (CRM) in e-government: a relational perspective. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 237–250.CrossRef
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for further research. Journal of Marketing, 48, 41–50.CrossRef
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991a). Understanding customer expectations of service. Sloan Management Review, 32, 39–48.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991b). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420–50.
Payani, H. H. (2000). Selected problems in the Papua New Guinean public service. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 22(2), 135–160.
Perrott, B. (1996). Managing strategic issues in the public service. Long Range Planning, 29(3), 337–45.CrossRef
Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune of the bottom of the pyramid. Eradicating poverty through profits. United States of America: Wharton School Publishing.
Rodríguez, P. G., Burguete, J. L. V., Vaughan, R., & Edwards, J. (2009). Quality dimensions in the public sector: municipal services and citizen’s perception. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 6, 75–90.CrossRef
Seifert, J. W., & Bonham, G. M. (2003). The transformative potential of e-government in transitional democracies, The International Conference on Public Administration in the 21st Century: Concepts, Methods, Technologies, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 26–29 May 2003.
Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models—a meta-synthesis based on the meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 443–58.CrossRef
Singh, G., Pathak, R. D., Naz, R., & Belwal, R. (2010). e-governance and the potential for corruption reduction in developing countries: perceptions from India, Ethiopia and Fiji. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(3), 254–275.CrossRef
Tan, C. W., & Pan, S. L. (2003). Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269–81.CrossRef
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–69.CrossRef
Toshifumi, N., & Himanshu, T. (2004). eGovernance initiatives in India: Citizens Would Rather Be Online Than In-Line. [online]. Retrieved 4 March, 2010 from: http://www.ps.ritsumei.ac.jp/assoc/policy_science/121/12101.pdf.
UNDP (2010). E-governance and access to information for citizens’ participation. Practice Notes. Retrieved 1 April, 2010 from: http://www.undp.org/governance/slegov.Htm.
United Nations (2008). United Nations e-Government Survey 2008: From e-Government to Connected Governance, United Nations, New York, 2008. . Retrieved 1 April, 2010 from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN028607.pdf.
United NationsN-Economic and Social Council (2003). Status and trend in the development of E-Government. Enhancing the capacity of public administration to implement the United Nations Millennium Declaration. Experts on Public Administration, Second session, New York, 7–11 April. Retrieved 4 April, 2010 from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan008253.pdf.
World Bank. World Development Report (2004). Making Services Work for Poor People. A publication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press (2003). In APDIP e-note 11. (2007).. Pro-Poor Public Service Delivery With ICTs. Making Local e-Governance work towards achieving the millennium development goals. Retrieved 4 May, 2005, http://www.apdip.net/apdipenote/11.pdf.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 33–46.CrossRef
- Service Delivery Through E-Governance: Perception and Expectation of Customers in Fiji and PNG
Public Organization Review
Volume 11, Issue 4 , pp 371-384
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Public service delivery
- Customer service