Abstract
Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) move from a region with high fertility to regions with low fertility. Yet very few studies have examined the reproductive behavior of international migrants from SSA. This study examines the roles of origin and destination socialization on the fertility and fertility ideals of SSA migrants in France. The study draws on measures of assimilation to systematically examine the effects of socialization and adaptation as well as transnationalism for the effects of sustained origin ties. Data are from the TEO (“Trajectoires et Origines”) survey conducted in France (2008/2009). Logistic regression is used to examine current fertility (the odds of having a birth in the preceding 5 years), and poisson regression is used to examine cumulative fertility (children ever born) and fertility ideals (reported ideal number of children in a family). Controlling for sociodemographic factors, first-generation SSA migrants have higher fertility than second-generation SSA migrants and non-immigrants. But first- and second-generation SSA migrants have higher fertility ideals than non-immigrants. Among SSA migrants, first- and second-generation migrants do not differ in fertility and fertility ideals when adaptation is accounted for. Most measures of adaptation are negatively associated with actual fertility and fertility ideals. Transnationalism is associated with higher fertility ideals but less so with actual fertility. The study finds some evidence for origin socialization, but the findings are more strongly supportive of adaptation to the host society. Origin socialization appears to have a stronger influence on fertility ideals than actual fertility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Over 56,000 undocumented SSA migrants are estimated to be in France (Lessault and Beauchemin 2009).
The socialization theory has been referred to by some as assimilation theory; others refer to the adaptation theory as assimilation theory, while others use assimilation refer to both socialization and adaptation (Stephen and Bean 1992; Milewski 2009; Lindstrom and Saucedo 2002). We use the later because assimilation and adaptation are more similar (essentially the same) than assimilation and socialization. However, the variable commonly used to evaluate the effect of socialization (birthplace or generational status), is also a measure of assimilation. Thus assimilation as used in the general migrant incorporation encompasses both adaptation and socialization theories.
The TEO survey was conducted jointly by INED and INSEE. Details on the survey can be found at http://www.teo_english.site.ined.fr/ (in English); and even more details at http://www.teo.site.ined.fr/ (in French).
Details on the sampling methodology at: http://www.ined.fr/fichier/t_telechargement/26218/telechargement_fichier_en_teo.note.eng.pdf, in the codebook for the dataset, and in Beauchemin et al. (2011).
91 missing cases on migration status (from missing data on birthplace of parents), 381 on education, and 342 on religion.
Preliminary analysis and diagnostics identified the relationship between age and number of children to be curvilinear for the measure of current fertility, so a squared term for age is included in the regressions for that. Income and employment status are not included in the final models because they did not improve the model. Because income is missing on about a third of the observations, multiple imputations was done to check if this might improve its effect, but the results did not differ significantly hence it was excluded from the final models. For the regression with the subset of only SSA migrants, religion, age at naturalization, place of residence of partner, place of early education, a variable for at least one parent born in France and both parents born in SSA, dummy variables for country of birth, and an interaction term for generational status and transnationalism were included in the initial models, but these did not improve the models and so are not included in the final models presented. As seen in the pseudo R 2 values, the models for the regression on fertility are better well specified than those on fertility ideals.
References
Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Andersson, G. (2004). Childbearing after migration: Fertility patterns of foreign-born women in Sweden1. International Migration Review, 38(2), 747–774.
Bass, L. E. (2014). African immigrant families in another France. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Beauchemin, C., Hamel, C., & Simon, P. (2010). Trajectories and origins: Survey on population diversity in France. Working Paper No. 168.1. Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED). Retrieved June 11, 2012, from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/idgwpaper/168.1.htm.
Beauchemin, C., Lagrange, H., & Safi, M. (2011). Transnationalism and immigrant assimilation in France: Between here and there? Working Paper No. 172. Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED). Retrieved June 11, 2012, from http://ideas.repec.org/p/idg/wpaper/172.html.
Bledsoe, C., Houle, R., & Sow, P. (2007). High fertility Gambians in low fertility Spain: The dynamics of child accumulation across transnational space. Demographic Research, 16(12), 375–412.
Borrel, C., & Lhommeau, B. (2010). INSEE—Population—Born in France to an immigrant parent. Retrieved October 31, 2014, from http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/document.asp?ref_id=ip1287.
Brockerhoff, M. (1995). Fertility and family planning in African cities: The impact of female migration. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27(3), 347–358.
Brockerhoff, M. (1998). Migration and the fertility transition in African cities. In Migration, urbanization, and development: New directions and issues (pp. 357–392). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brown, S. K., & Bean, F. D. (2006). Assimilation models, old and new: Explaining a long-term process. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from http://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/display.cfm?ID=442.
Carter, M. (2000). Fertility of Mexican immigrant women in the US: A closer look. Social Science Quarterly, 81(4), 1073–1086.
Chattopadhyay, A., White, M. J., & Debpuur, C. (2006). Migrant fertility in Ghana: Selection versus adaptation and disruption as causal mechanisms. Population Studies, 60(2), 189–203.
Fargues, P. (2011). International migration and the demographic transition: A two-way interaction. International Migration Review, 45(3), 588–614. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00859.x.
Frank, R., & Heuveline, P. (2005). A cross-over in Mexican and Mexican–American fertility rates. Demographic Research, 12, 77–104. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.4.
Genereux, A. (2007). A review of migration and fertility theory through the lens of African immigrant fertility in France. MPIDR Working Papers.
Georgiadis, K. (2008). Migration and reproductive health: A review of the literature. University College London, Department of Anthropology, Working Paper, 1, 2008.
Guarnizo, L. E., Portes, A., & Haller, W. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1211–1248.
Hamel, C., & Pailhé, A. (2012). Former une famille en contexte migratoire. Document de travail, n°181. Paris: INED. Retrieved October 21, 2014, from http://www.ined.fr/fr/publications/document-travail/former-famille-contexte-migratoire/.
Héran, F., & Pison, G. (2007). Two children per woman in France in 2006: Are immigrants to blame? Population and Societies No. 432. Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED). http://ideas.repec.org/p/idg/posoce/432.html.
INSEE. (2011). INSEE—Population—Être né en France d’un parent immigré. Retrieved October 31, 2014, from http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?reg_id=0&ref_id=ip1287.
Kivisto, P. (2001). Theorizing transnational immigration: A critical review of current efforts. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 549–577.
Kulu, H. (2005). Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 21(1), 51–87.
Lessault, D., & Beauchemin, C. (2009). Migration from sub-Saharan Africa to Europe: Still a limited trend. Population and Societies, 452. https://www.ined.fr/en/publications/population-and-societies/migration-from-sub-saharan-africa-to-europe-still-a-limited-trend-en/.
Lindstrom, D. P., & Saucedo, S. G. (2002). The short- and long-term effects of US migration experience on Mexican women’s fertility. Social Forces, 80(4), 1341–1368.
Milewski, N. (2009). Fertility of immigrants: A two-generational approach in Germany. Heidelberg: Springer.
Milewski, N. (2010). Theory and empirical findings in previous investigations. In Fertility of immigrants (pp. 19–77). Berlin: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-03705-4_2.
Ng, E., & Nault, F. (1997). Fertility among recent immigrant women to Canada, 1991: An examination of the disruption hypothesis. International Migration, 35(4), 559–580.
Parrado, E. A., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Intergenerational fertility among Hispanic women: New evidence of immigrant assimilation. Demography, 45(3), 651–671.
Penn, R., & Lambert, P. (2002). Attitudes towards ideal family size of different ethnic/nationality groups in Great Britain, France and Germany. Women, 16(34), 35–59.
Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217–237.
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2006). Immigrant America: A portrait (3rd Ed., Revised). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
PRB. (2013). World-data profile | DataFinder by the Population Reference Bureau. Retrieved June 14, 2012, from http://www.prb.org/DataFinder/Geography/Data.aspx?loc=247.
Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2001). Demography. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sargent, C., & Cordell, D. (2003). Polygamy, disrupted reproduction, and the state: Malian migrants in Paris, France. Social Science and Medicine, 56(9), 1961–1972.
Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc-Szanton, C. (1992). Transnationalism: A new analytic framework for understanding migration. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 645(1), 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33484.x.
Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc-Szanton, C. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63.
Schoenmaeckers, R. C., Lodewijckx, E., & Gadeyne, S. (1999). Marriages and fertility among Turkish and Moroccan women in Belgium: Results from census data. International Migration Review, 33(4), 901–928. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33484.x.
Stephen, E. H., & Bean, F. D. (1992). Assimilation, disruption and the fertility of Mexican-origin women in the United States. International Migration Review, 26(1), 67–88.
Toulemon, L. (2004). Fertility among immigrant women: New data, a new approach. Population and Societes, 400, 1–4.
Waldinger, R. (2015). The cross-border connection: Immigrants, emigrants, and their homelands. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waldinger, R. D., & Fitzgerald, D. (2004). Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1177–1195.
Waldinger, R. D., Soehl, T., & Lim, N. (2012). Emigrants and the body politic left behind: Results from the Latino national survey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(5), 711–736.
White, M. J., Tagoe, E., Stiff, C., Adazu, K., & Smith, D. J. (2005). Urbanization and the fertility transition in Ghana. Population Research and Policy Review, 24(1), 59–83.
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Roger Waldinger and Anne Pebley for their invaluable mentoring, suggestions, and encouragement during the writing of this paper. We also grateful to Gail Harrison, Gilbert Gee, Jennie Brand, Patrick Heuveline, and Goleen Samari for useful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the paper. PA would like to acknowledge funding support from the Bixby Doctoral Fellowship in Population, the Margaret McNamara Memorial Fund, the UCLA Graduate Division, and the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health for fellowship support during the period of this work, and the Centre Maurice Halbwachs for granting access to the data [Trajectoires et origines (TEO)—version complète—2008: (2008, fichier électronique), INED et INSEE (producteur), Centre Maurice Halbwachs (CMH, diffuseur)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afulani, P.A., Asunka, J. Socialization, Adaptation, Transnationalism, and the Reproductive Behavior of Sub-Saharan African Migrants in France. Popul Res Policy Rev 34, 561–592 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-015-9360-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-015-9360-2