Abramson, P. R. (1997). Postmaterialism and environmentalism: A comment on an analysis and a reappraisal. Social Science Quarterly,
Adeola, F. O. (2004). Environmentalism and risk perception: Empirical analysis of black and white differentials and convergence. Society & Natural Resources,
Adeola, F. O. (2007). Nativity and environmental risk perception: An empirical study of native-born and foreign-born residents of the USA. Human Ecology Review,
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brechin, S. R. (1999). Objective problems, subjective values, and global environmentalism: Evaluating the postmaterialist argument and challenging a new explanation. Social Science Quarterly,
Brechin, S. R., & Kempton, W. (1994). Global environmentalism: A challenge to the postmaterialism thesis. Social Science Quarterly,
Brechin, S. R., & Kempton, W. (1997). Beyond postmaterialist values: National versus individual explanations of global environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly,
Brulle, R. J., & Pellow, D. N. (2006). Environmental justice: Human health and environmental inequalities. Annual Review of Public Health,
Buttel, F. H. (1979). Age and environmental concern: A multivariate analysis. Youth & Society,
Buttel, F. H., & Flinn, W. L. (1974). The structure of support for the environmental movement, 1968–1970. Rural Sociology,
Buttel, F. H., & Flinn, W. L. (1978). Social class and mass environmental beliefs: A reconsideration. Environment and Behavior,
Casterline, J. B. (2001). Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Introduction. In John. B. Casterline (Ed.), Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Selected perspectives (pp. 1–38). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior,
Diekmann, A., & Franzen, A. (1999). The wealth of nations and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior,
Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society,
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources,
Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G., & Gallup, A. (1992). The health of the planet survey: A preliminary report on attitudes toward the environment and economic growth measured by surveys of citizens in 22 nations to date. Princeton, NJ: Gallup International Institute.
Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite? Journal of Social Issues,
Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1997). Global environmental concern: An anomaly for postmaterialism. Social Science Quarterly,
Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. Sociological Quarterly,
Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2004). Generation cohorts and personal values: A comparison of China and the United States. Organization Science,
Fischer, C. S. (1978). Urban-to-rural diffusion of opinions in contemporary America. American Journal of Sociology,
Fischer, C. S., & Hout, M. (2006). Century of difference: How America changed in the last one hundred years. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review,
Frank, D. J., Longhofer, W., & Schofer, E. (2007). Wold Society, NGOs, and environmental policy reform in Asia. International Journal of Comparative Sociology,
Franzen, A. (2003). Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Social Science Quarterly,
Franzen, A., & Meyer, R. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review,
Gelissen, J. (2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection—A multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environment and Behavior,
Givens, J. E., & Jorgenson, A. K. (2011). The effects of affluence, economic development, and environmental degradation on environmental concern: A multilevel analysis. [Article]. Organization & Environment,
Hamilton, L. C., Colocousis, C. R., & Duncan, C. M. (2010). Place effects on environmental views. Rural Sociology,
Hunter, L. M., Strife, S., & Twine, W. (2010). Environmental perceptions of rural South African residents: The complex nature of environmental concern. Society & Natural Resources,
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science and Politics,
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic-security and value change. American Political Science Review,
Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology,
Kahn, M. E. (2002). Demographic change and the demand for environmental regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,
Kanagy, C. L., Humphrey, C. R., & Firebaugh, G. (1994). Surging environmentalism: Changing public opinion or changing publics? Social Science Quarterly,
Kemmelmeier, M., Krol, G., & Kim, Y. H. (2002). Values, economics, and proenvironmental attitudes in 22 societies. Cross-Cultural Research,
Kidd, Q., & Lee, A.-R. (1997). Postmaterialist values and the environment: A critique and reappraisal. Social Science Quarterly,
Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it’s measured. Social Science Quarterly,
Knight, K. W., & Messer, B. L. (2012). Environmental concern in cross-national perspective: The effects of affluence, environmental degradation, and world society. Social Science Quarterly,
Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K. H., Haberl, H., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2009). Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics,
Longhofer, W., & Schofer, E. (2010). National and global origins of environmental association. American Sociological Review,
Lubinski, D., Schmidt, D. B., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). A 20-year stability analysis of the study of values for intellectually gifted individuals from adolescence to adulthood. [Article]. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Maloney, M. P., Ward, M. P., & Braucht, G. N. (1975). Psychology in action—Revised scale for measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist,
Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2008). Are there similar sources of environmental concern? Comparing industrialized countries. Social Science Quarterly,
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011a). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions,
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011b). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly,
Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management,
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. [Review]. American Journal of Sociology,
Meyer, R., & Liebe, U. (2010). Are the affluent prepared to pay for the planet? Explaining willingness to pay for public and quasi-private environmental goods in Switzerland. Population and Environment,
Mohai, P., & Twight, B. W. (1987). Age and environmentalism: An elaboration of the Buttel model using national survey evidence. Social Science Quarterly,
Montgomery, M. R., & Casterline, J. B. (1993). The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models. Population Studies,
Morrison, D. E. (1986). How and why environmental consciousness has trickled down. In A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, & K. Zimmermann (Eds.), Distributional conflicts in environmental-resource policy (pp. 187–220). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Mostafa, M. M. (2011). Wealth, post-materialism and consumer’s pro-environmental intentions: A multilevel analysis across 25 nations. Sustainable Development
Nam, C. B., & Powers, M. G. (1965). Variations in socioeconomic structure by race, residence, and the life-cycle. American Sociological Review,
Nam, C. B., & Terrie, W. E. (1982). Measurement of socioeconomic status from United States census data. In M. G. Powers (Ed.), Measures of socioeconomic status (pp. 29–42). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science and Medicine,
Pampel, F. C. (2011). Support for nuclear energy in the context of climate change: Evidence from the European Union. Organization & Environment,
Pampel, F. C., & Hunter, L. M. (2012). Cohort change, diffusion, and support for environmental spending. American Journal of Sociology,
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review,
Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review,
Schofer, E., & Hironaka, A. (2005). The effects of world society on environmental protection outcomes. Social Forces,
Shandra, J. M., Shor, E., & London, B. (2009). World polity, unequal ecological exchange, and organic water pollution: A cross-national analysis of developing nations. Human Ecology Review,
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues,
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society,
Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology,
Uyeki, E. S., & Holland, L. J. (2000). Diffusion of pro-environment attitudes? American Behavioral Scientist,
Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1981). Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environment and Behavior,
Weber, M. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (Edited and with an introduction by H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology,
Whittaker, M., Segura, G. M., & Bowler, S. (2005). Racial/ethnic group attitudes toward environmental protection in California: Is “environmentalism” still a white phenomenon? Political Research Quarterly,
Wilson, J. A., & Gove, W. R. (1999). The intercohort decline in verbal ability: Does it exist? American Sociological Review,
Winkleby, M. A., Jatulis, D. E., Frank, E., & Fortmann, S. P. (1992). Socioeconomic-status and health—How education, income, and occupation contribute to risk-factors for cardiovascular-disease. American Journal of Public Health,
Xiao, C. Y., & Dunlap, R. E. (2007). Validating a comprehensive model of environmental concern cross-nationally: A US-Canadian comparison. Social Science Quarterly,
Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology,