Angrist, J., & Pitschke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Apple, M. (2006). Educating the right way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Arceneaux, K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2009). Modeling certainty with clustered data: A comparison of methods. Political Analysis,
Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2008). The Experimental Approach to Development Economics (No. w14467). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., & Thomas, K. F. (2000). What’s at stake in high-stakes testing teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education,
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). The public understanding of assessment in education in the United States. Oxford Review of Education,
Bruch, S., Ferree, M., & Soss, J. (2010). From policy to polity: Democracy, paternalism, and the incorporation of disadvantaged citizens. American Sociological Review,
Bushaw, W. J., & Lopez, S. J. (2012). Public education in the United States: A Nation divided. In: The 44th annual phi delta kappa/gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Washington, DC: Phi Delta Kappa.
Campbell, A. (2002). Self-interest, social security, and the distinctive participation patterns of senior citizens. American Political Science Review,
Campbell, A. (2003a). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the american welfare state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Campbell, A. (2003b). Participatory reactions to policy threats: Senior citizens and the defense of social security and medicare. Political Behavior,
Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights. (2001). Closing the deal: A preliminary report on state compliance with final assessment and accountability requirements under the improving America’s Schools Act of 1994. Washington, DC: Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights.
Cohen, D. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher,
Cooperative Congressional Elections Study. (2012). Available from the Cooperative Congressional Elections Study website. Retrieved July 1, 2012 from http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/cces/
DeBray-Pelot, E., & McGuinn, P. (2009). The new politics of education: Analyzing the federal education policy landscape in the post-NCLB era. Educational Policy,
Dee, T., & Jacob, B. (2011). The impact of no child left behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,
Diamond, A., & Sekhon, J. (2013). Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: A general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Review of Economics and Statistics,
Editorial Projects in Education. (2012). Available from Editorial Projects in Education, Custom Data Services
. Retrieved June 10, 2012 from http://www.edweek.org/rc/collections/2009/11/02/k12data.html
Education Week. (2012a). Quality counts 2012
: The global challenge.
Washington, DC: Education Week. Retrieved July 11, 2013 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2012/01/12/index.html?intc=EW-QC12-FL1
Education Week. (2012b). Methodology: About the state policy survey
. Retrieved July 11, 2013 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/01/12/16method.h31.html?intc=EW-QC12-TOC
Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review,
Figlio, D. N. (2005). Testing, crime and punishment. Journal of Public Economics,
Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. Handbook of the Economics of Education,
Figlio, D., & Rouse, C. (2006). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools? Journal of Public Economics,
Figlio, D. N., & Winicki, J. (2005). Food for thought: The effects of school accountability plans on school nutrition. Journal of Public Economics,
Fuhrman, S. H., & Massell, D. (1992). Issues and strategies in systemic reform. In: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. New Brunswick, NJ.
Hanushek, E., & Raymond, M. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,
Hetherington, M. (2005). Why trust matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology,
Ho, D., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis,
Ho, D., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal analysis
, June 28. Retrieved July 11, 2013 from http://r.iq.harvard.edu/docs/matchit/2.4-20/matchit.pdf
Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. (2010). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Version 1.2-18, November 4. Retrieved July 12, 2013 from http://gking.harvard.edu/amelia
Hong, S., & Ho, H. Z. (2005). Direct and indirect longitudinal effects of parental involvement on student achievement: Second-order latent growth modeling across ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology,
Hursh, D. (2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal,
Imbens, G. M., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2008). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation (No. w14251). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jacob, B. A. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools. Journal of Public Economics,
Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Jacobson, R., Saultz, A., & Snyder, J. W. (2013). When accountability strategies collide: Do policy changes that raise accountability standards also erode public satisfaction? Educational Policy,
Jeynes, W. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education,
Jolliffe, D., & Hedderman, C. (2012). Investigating the impact of custody on reoffending using propensity score matching. Crime and Delinquency,
Keele, L. (2009). rbounds: An R package for sensitivity analysis with matched data. Retrieved July 11, 2013 from http://www.personal.psu.edu/ljk20/rbounds.html
Keele, L. (2010). An overview of rbounds: An R package for rosenbaum bounds sensitivity analysis with matched data
. Retrieved July 11, 2013 from http://www.personal.psu.edu/ljk20/rbounds%20vignette.pdf
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review,
King, G., & Zeng, L. (2006). The dangers of extreme counterfactuals. Political Analysis,
Krieg, J. M. (2008). Are students left behind? The distributional effects of the No Child Left Behind Act. Education,
Manna, P. (2006). School’s in: Federalism and the National Education Agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Manna, P. (2010). Collision course: Federal education policy meets state and local realities. Washington, DC: CQ.
Mayer, A. K. (2011). Does education increase political participation? Journal of Politics,
McDonald, M. (2013). United States Elections Project Database. Retrieved July 11, 2013 form http://elections.gmu.edu/voter_turnout.htm
McGuinn, P. (2006). No child left behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965–2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Mehta, J. (2013). How paradigms create politics: The transformation of American Educational Policy, 1980–2001. American Educational Research Journal,
Mettler, S. (2002). Bringing the state back into civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review,
Mettler, S. (2005). Soldiers to citizens: The G.I. Bill and the making of the greatest generation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics,
Mettler, S., & Stonecash, J. (2008). Government program usage and political voice. Social Science Quarterly,
Mettler, S., & Welch, E. (2004). Civic generation: Policy feedback effects of the gi bill on political involvement over the life course. British Journal of Political Science,
Mulvenon, S. W., Stegman, C. E., & Ritter, G. (2005). Test anxiety: A multifaceted study on the perceptions of teachers, principals, counselors, students, and parents. International Journal of Testing,
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2012). Accessed from the National Assessment of Educational Progress website. Retrieved June 10, 2012 from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
Nitta, K. (2008). The politics of structural education reform. New York: Routledge.
Piche, D. (1999). Title I in Alabama: The struggle to meet basic needs. Washington, DC: Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights.
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics,
Polikoff, M. S. (2012). Instructional alignment under no child left behind. American Journal of Education,
Polikoff, M. S., Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. (2011). How well aligned are state assessments of student achievement with state content standards? American Educational Research Journal,
Program on Education Policy and Governance (PEPG). (2012). Survey of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Cambridge, MA: Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University.
Public Education Network. (2007). Open to the public: How communities, parents, and students assess the impact of the No Child Left Behind Act—2004–2007: The realities left behind. Washington, DC: Public Education Network.
Remillard, J. T., & Jackson, K. (2006). Old math, new math: Parents’ experiences with standards-based reform. Mathematical Thinking and Learning,
Rhodes, J. (2012). An education in politics: The origin and evolution of no child left behind. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Rogers, M., & Stoneman, C. (1999). Triggering educational accountability. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Education.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies
. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005). Observational study. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 1451–1462). Chichester: Wiley.
Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Segool, N. K., Carlson, J. S., Goforth, A. N., Embse, N., & Barterian, J. A. (2013). Heightened test anxiety among young children: Elementary school students’ anxious responses to high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools,
Sekhon, J. (2011). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software,
Sekhon, J., & Grieve, R. (2013) (N.d). A nonparametric matching method for covariate adjustment with application to economic evaluations. working paper. Retrieved July 11, 2013 from http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/papers/GeneticMatching_SekhonGrieve.pdf
Smith, M. S., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. Journal of Education Policy,
Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review,
Soss, J. (2000). Unwanted claims: The politics of participation in the U.S. welfare system. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Soss, J. (2005). Making clients and citizens welfare policy as a source of status, belief, and action. In A. Schneider & H. Ingram (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy (pp. 291–328). New York: SUNY.
Stuart, E. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science,
Supovitz, J. A., & Taylor, B. S. (2005). Systemic education evaluation: Evaluating the impact of systemwide reform in education. American Journal of Evaluation,
Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2003). Clarify: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results
. Retrieved July 11, 2013 from http://gking.harvard.edu/clarify
Tourangeau, K., Nord, C., Le, T., Sorongon, A. G., & Najarian, M. (2010). Combined user’s manual for the ECLS-K eighth-grade and K-8 full sample data files. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. General Accountability Office. (2000). Title I program: Stronger accountability needed for performance of disadvantaged students. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
Weaver, V., & Lerman, A. (2010). Political consequences of the carceral state. American Political Science Review,
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly,