Alesina, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Partisan politics, divided government, and the economy
. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Basinger, S. J., & Lavine, H. (2005). Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice. American Political Science Review,
Beck, P. A., Baum, L., Clausen, A. R., & Smith, C. E. (1992). Patterns and sources of ticket splitting in subpresidential voting. American Political Science Review,
Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brunell, T. L., & Grofman, B. (2009). Testing sincere versus strategic split-ticket voting at the aggregate level: Evidence from split house-president outcomes, 1900–2004. Electoral Studies, 28
Burden, B. C. (Ed.). (2002). Uncertainty in American politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burden, B. C., & Kimball, D. C. (2004). Why Americans split their tickets: Campaigns, competition, and divided government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Campbell, A., & Miller, W. E. (1957). The motivational basis of straight and split-ticket voting. American Political Science Review,
Carsey, T. M., & Layman, G. C. (2004). Policy balancing and preferences for party control of government. Political Research Quarterly,
Fiorina, M. P. (1977). An outline for a model of party choice. American Journal of Political Science, 21
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fiorina, M. P. (1996). Divided government (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Garand, J. C., & Lichtal, M. G. (2000). Explaining divided government in the United States: Testing an intentional model of split-ticket voting. British Journal of Political Science,
Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Klar, S. (2013). Identity and engagement among political independents in America. Political Psychology
Lavine, H. (2001). The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates. American Journal of Political Science,
Lavine, H., Johnson, C. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. R., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. New York: Duell, Sloane, and Pearce.
Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Nadeau, R. (2004). Split-ticket voting: The effects of cognitive Madisonianism. The Journal of Politics,
Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review,
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.
Meffert, M. F., Guge, M., & Lodge, M. (2004). Good, bad, indifferent, and ambivalent: The consequence of multidimensional political attitudes. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 60–100). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mulligan, K. (2011). Partisan ambivalence, split-ticket voting, and divided government. Political Psychology,
Nir, L., & Druckman, J. N. (2008). Campaign mixed-message flows and timing of vote decision. International Journal of Public Opinion Research,
Petrocik, J. R. (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification. Political Methodology,
Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Rudolph, T. J. (2005). Group attachment and the reduction of value-driven ambivalence. Political Psychology,
Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Thompson, M., Zanna, M., & Griffin, D. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In J. Krosnick (Ed.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thornton, J. R. (2011). Ambivalent or indifferent: Examining the properties of measures of partisan ambivalence. Political Psychology,
Thornton, J. R. (2013a). Getting lost on the way to the party: Ambivalence, indifference, and defection with evidence from two presidential elections. Social Science Quarterly
Thornton, J. R. (2013b). The impact of elite polarization on partisan ambivalence and indifference. Political Behavior,
Yoo, S. (2010). Two types of neutrality: Ambivalence versus indifference and political participation. Journal of Politics,
Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science,