Skip to main content
Log in

The Physiology of Political Participation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Political involvement varies markedly across people. Traditional explanations for this variation tend to rely on demographic variables and self-reported, overtly political concepts. In this article, we expand the range of possible explanatory variables by hypothesizing that a correlation exists between political involvement and physiological predispositions. We measure physiology by computing the degree to which electrodermal activity changes on average when a participant sequentially views a full range of differentially valenced stimuli. Our findings indicate that individuals with higher electrodermal responsiveness are also more likely to participate actively in politics. This relationship holds even after the effects of traditional demographic variables are taken into account, suggesting that physiological responsiveness independently contributes to a fuller understanding of the underlying sources of variation in political involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Evolutionary psychology offers sensible reasons that portions of human response should register outside of conscious thought. For example, some needed responses may be quicker and more direct without the involvement of consciousness (e.g., pulling one’s hand from a fire prior to realizing that the hand is burning) and sometimes keeping information out of conscious awareness prevents overloading.

  2. We used a 1-factor solution from the principal-components factor analysis to create the overall participation index. The factor loadings for each of the individual participation measures were as follows: register to vote (.468), vote (.639), frequency of political discussion (.759), feel strongly about an issue (.819), issue voted (.824), campaigned for a candidate (.599), contributed money (.651), contacted elected officials (.658), attempted to persuade others (.817), joined a political organization (.736), and attended meetings on an issue (.583).

  3. As a check we also created a version of the participation index by standardizing and summing the individual items without weighting. This measure correlated very highly with the principal-components-derived measure of participation (r = .974, p < .001) and, as might be expected given the high correlation coefficient, did not produce substantively different results than those produced by the factor-derived measure of participation.

  4. The measure of EDA responsiveness was divided by 1,000 to make the size of the coefficient closer to that for the other variables.

  5. Because tests of increment to R 2 favor the partitioning of variance to variables entered into the model first, this is a conservative test of whether physiological variable contributes meaningfully to our understanding of political participation.

References

  • Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10(10), 1246–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, (2010). The politics. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D. C., & Tinnick, J. D. (2006). Competing visions of parental roles and ideological constraint. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blechert, J., Michael, T., Vriends, N., Margraf, J., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2007). Fear conditioning in posttraumatic stress disorder: Evidence for delayed extinction of autonomic, experiential, and behavioural responses. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2019–2033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brader, T. (2011). The political relevance of emotions: “Reassessing” revisited. Political Psychology, 32(2), 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 581–599). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, S. D., Angelini, J. R., & Lee, S. (2007). Psychophysiological and memory effects of negative political ads: Aversive, arousing, and well remembered. Journal of Advertising, 36, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. (2007). Psychophysiological science: Interdisciplinary approaches to classic questions about the mind. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington, H., et al. (2003). Influence of life stress on depression: Moderation by a polymorhpism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301(5631), 386–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crider, A., Kremen, W. S., Xian, H., Jacobson, K. C., Waterman, B., Eisen, S. A., et al. (2004). Stability, consistency, and heritability of electrodermal response lability in middle-aged male twins. Psychophysiology, 41(4), 501–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1994). Cortical systems for retrieval of concrete knowledge: The convergence zone framework. In C. Koch & J. L. Davis (Eds.), Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 61–74). Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. E., Filion, D. L., & Schell, A. M. (1989). Is elicitation of the autonomic orienting response associated with allocation of processing resources? Psychophysiology, 26(5), 560–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2007). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H. (2006). Altruism and turnout. Journal of Politics, 68(3), 674–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Two genes predict voter turnout. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdi, S., Arcuri, L., & Gawronski, B. (2008). Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers. Science, 321, 1100–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S. (2011). Who’s in charge?: Free will and the science of the brain. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4(3), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1788). The federalist. New York: Barnes and Noble Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch, Y. (2002). “Neither an angel nor an ant”: Emotion as an aid to bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2011). The normative implications of biological research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44, 325–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helzer, E. G., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22(4), 517–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 394–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J. M., & Lenz, G. S. (2008). Reassessing the role of anxiety in vote choice. Political Psychology, 29(2), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). Effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers’ cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Shackman, A. J., Jacobs, D. C., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Test-retest reliability of voluntary emotion regulation. Psychophysiology, 46(4), 874–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. D., Schreiber, D., & Ochsner, K. N. (2003). Is political cognition like riding a bicycle? How cognitive neuroscience can inform research on political thinking. Political Psychology, 24(4), 681–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (2003). The psychology of emotion and politics. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 182–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Neuman, W. R. (2011). Parsimony and complexity: Developing and testing theories of affective intelligence. Political Psychology, 32(2), 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., & Lees, J. L. (1990). Arousal, extraversion, and individual differences in resource availability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 150–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (2004). The feeling of rationality: The meaning of neuroscientific advances for political science. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 691–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(01), 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(01), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neblo, M. A. (2007). Philosophical psychology with political intent. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (1st ed., pp. 25–47). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1989). Applied linear regression models. Scarborough, ON: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikula, R. (1991). Psychological correlates of nonspecific skin conductance responses. Psychophysiology, 28(1), 86–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. (1967). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(01), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, M. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 747–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quevedo, K., Smith, T., Donzella, B., Schunk, E., & Gunnar, M. (2010). The startle response: Developmental effects and a paradigm for children and adults. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(1), 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever “get it”? Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, T. J., Gangl, A., & Stevens, D. (2000). The effects of efficacy and emotions on campaign involvement. Journal of Politics, 62(4), 1189–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, A., Dawson, M., Nuechterline, K., Subotnik, K., & Venture, J. (2002). The temporal stability of electrodermal variables over a one-year period. Psychophysiology, 39, 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). The mind body connection: Psychophysiology as an approach to studying political attitudes and behaviors. In The political animal. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011a). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e25552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011b). Linking genetics and political attitudes: Reconceptualizing political ideology. Political Psychology, 32(3), 369–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spezio, M. L., & Adolphs, R. (2007). Emotional processing and political judgment: Toward integrating political psychology and decision neuroscience. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (1st ed., pp. 71–96). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, S. J., LaBar, K. S., Saini, E. K., Kuhn, C. M., & Beehner, J. C. (2010). Stressful politics: Voters’ cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(5), 768–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 556–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73, 156–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlke, J. C., & Lodge, M. (1972). Psychophysiological measures of political attitudes and behavior. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 505–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16(10), 780–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Financial support for latter portions of this project was provided by the National Science Foundation (BCS 08-26828).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Hibbing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruszczynski, M.W., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C.M. et al. The Physiology of Political Participation. Polit Behav 35, 135–152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-012-9197-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-012-9197-x

Keywords

Navigation