The Consequences of Political Cynicism: How Cynicism Shapes Citizens’ Reactions to Political Scandals
- Logan Dancey
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper argues cynicism toward elected officials colors how individuals in the mass public interpret information about political scandals. Specifically, citizens rely on prior levels of cynicism toward elected officials when assessing new information about potential political malfeasance. Drawing on panel data surrounding two prominent political scandals, this paper demonstrates prior levels of cynicism shape individuals’ interpretations of information about scandals, but cynicism does not affect the amount of attention individuals pay to scandals. Ultimately, the results shed light on individual-level variation in response to scandals, and suggest expressed cynicism toward politicians is a politically consequential individual-level attitude that affects whether or not political leaders can survive ethical transgressions.
- Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
- Blais, A., Everitt, J., Fournier, P., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2005). The political psychology of voters’ reactions to a corruption scandal. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, DC.
- Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Fournier, P., Everitt, J., Nevitte, N., & Kim, J. (2010). Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects. Electoral Studies, 29, 1–12. CrossRef
- Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271–287. CrossRef
- Capella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: the press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256. CrossRef
- Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review, 68, 973–988. CrossRef
- Citrin, J., & Green, D. P. (1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 431–453. CrossRef
- Citrin, J., & Muste, C. (1999). Trust in government. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.
- Cook, T., & Gronke, P. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meaning of trust in government and confidence in institutions. The Journal of Politics, 67(3), 784–803.
- CQ Weekly. (April 18, 1992). Overdrafts listed from most to least according to house ethics committee, pp. 1006–1007. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/WR102406617.
- CQ Weekly. (January 23, 2006). Three decades of lobbying scandal and repercussion, p. 239. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport109-000002037887.
- Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314. CrossRef
- Dimock, M. A., & Jacobson, G. C. (1995). Checks and choices: The house bank scandal’s impact on voters in 1992. The Journal of Politics, 57(4), 1143–1159. CrossRef
- Eisinger, R. M. (2000). Questioning cynicism. Society, 37(5), 55–60. CrossRef
- Fischle, M. (2000). Mass response to the lewinsky scandal: motivated reasoning or bayesian updating? Political Psychology, 21(1), 135–159. CrossRef
- Funk, C. L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18(1), 1–24. CrossRef
- Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974. CrossRef
- Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matter: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Hibbing, J. R., & Welch, S. (1997). The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections, 1982–1990. The Journal of Politics, 59(1), 226–239. CrossRef
- Holm, J. D., Bochner, A. P. and Kraus, S. (1976) Watergate hearings panel survey. [Computer file]. Cleveland, OH: J D. Holm, Cleveland State University, Department of Political Science [producer], 1974. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. doi:10.3886/ICPSR07352.
- Holm, J., Kraus, S., & Bochner, A. (1974). Communication and opinion formation: Issues generated by the watergate hearings. Communication Research, 1(4), 368–389. CrossRef
- Johnston, D. (1992). Investigator finds evidence of crimes in house bank use. New York Times, 17 December.
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. CrossRef
- Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
- McGraw, Kathleen., Lodge, M., & Jones, J. M. (2002). The pandering politicians of suspicious minds. The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 362–383. CrossRef
- Robinson, M. J. (1974). The impact of the televised watergate hearings. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 17–29. CrossRef
- Rudolph, T. J., & Evans, J. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 660–671. CrossRef
- Saad, L. (2009). Honesty and ethics poll finds congress’ image tarnished. http://www.gallup.com/poll/124625/honesty-ethics-poll-finds-congress-image-tarnished.aspx.
- Sanitioso, R., Kunda, Z., & Fong, G. T. (1990). Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 229–241. CrossRef
- Stoker, L. (1993). Judging presidential character: The demise of gary hart. Political Behavior, 15(2), 193–223. CrossRef
- Sweeney, P. D., & Gruber, K. L. (1984). Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the watergate affair. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (46), 1208–1221.
- Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in political information processing. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. CrossRef
- Weatherford, M. S. (1992). Measuring political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 86(1), 149–166. CrossRef
- The Consequences of Political Cynicism: How Cynicism Shapes Citizens’ Reactions to Political Scandals
Volume 34, Issue 3 , pp 411-423
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Logan Dancey (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh, 4600 Wesley W. Posvar Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA