Political Behavior

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 433–454

Framing Labels and Immigration Policy Attitudes in the Iowa Caucuses: “Trying to Out-Tancredo Tancredo”

  • Benjamin R. Knoll
  • David P. Redlawsk
  • Howard Sanborn
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11109-010-9141-x

Cite this article as:
Knoll, B.R., Redlawsk, D.P. & Sanborn, H. Polit Behav (2011) 33: 433. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9141-x

Abstract

We use an experiment built into a series of surveys of Iowa voters during the 2008 Iowa Caucus campaign to test the effect of differing group framing labels on immigration policy preferences. We find that certain framing labels matter, but only among Republican partisans for whom the immigration issue is important. We also find that issue importance produces more conservative policy preferences for Democrats as well as Republicans. We examine and discuss these results as well as their implications for the immigration debate, the interaction between issue salience and policy preferences, and the theory of political framing in general.

Keywords

Immigration attitudesFraming labelsEthnic cuesIowa Caucuses

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin R. Knoll
    • 1
  • David P. Redlawsk
    • 2
  • Howard Sanborn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of GovernmentCentre CollegeDanvilleUSA
  2. 2.Eagleton Institute of PoliticsRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.Department of International StudiesVirginia Military InstituteLexingtonUSA