Political Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 181–204

Social Networks and the Affective Impact of Political Disagreement

Authors

    • Department of Political ScienceUniversity of South Carolina
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11109-009-9100-6

Cite this article as:
Parsons, B.M. Polit Behav (2010) 32: 181. doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9100-6

Abstract

Although few studies have explored the link between emotion and political talk, here I argue that political disagreement depolarizes emotional reactions via information exchanged in social networks. Analyzing data from the ANES 2008–2009 Panel Study, several conclusions are drawn. First, disagreement increases negative emotions and decreases positive emotions toward the in-party candidate, and also increases positive emotions and decreases negative emotions toward the out-party candidate. In other words, disagreement depolarizes emotions toward political candidates. Second, the affective impact of disagreement does not vary with political knowledge. Finally, positive emotions toward the out-party candidate and negative emotions toward the in-party candidate reduce political interest, candidate issue placement accuracy, and political participation. Overall, this study develops important theoretical connections between affect and political talk that have implications for the value of political disagreement.

Keywords

Social networks Emotion Affect Political disagreement Political sophistication Political participation

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009