Alston, W. (1980). Level confusions in epistemology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy,
Boghossian, P. (1989). The rule following considerations. Mind,
Boghossian, P. (Ed.). (2008). Epistemic rules. In Content and justification (pp. 109–134). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind,
Cheng, P., & Holyoak, K. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Psychology,
Christensen, D. (2004). Putting logic in its place
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Christensen, D. (2008). Does Murphy’s law apply in epistemology? Self-doubt and rational ideals. Oxford Studies in Epistemology,
Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange. Cognition,
Dretske, F. (1970). Epistemic operators. Journal of Philosophy,
Elga, A. (2010). How to disagree about how to disagree. In R. Feldman & T. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, J., Newstead, S., & Byrne, R. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Evnine, S. (1999). Believing conjunctions. Synthese,
Field, H. (2000). A prioricity as an evaluative notion. In P. Boghossian & C. Peacocke (Eds.), New essays on the a priori
(pp. 117–149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Field, H. (2009a). Epistemology without metaphysics. Philosophical Studies,
Field, H. (2009b). What is the normative role of logic? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume,
Harman, G. (1986). Change in view: Principles of reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harman, G. (1995). Rationality. In E. Smith & D. Oshershon (Eds.), Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 175–211). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kyburg, H. (1970). Conjunctivitis. In M. Swain (Ed.), Induction, acceptance, and rational belief
(pp. 55–82). New York: Humanities Press.CrossRef
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2008). Single premise deduction and risk. Philosophical Studies,
Lewis, D. (1971). Immodest inductive methods. Philosophy of Science,
Makinson, D. (1965). The paradox of the preface. Analysis,
Nelkin, D. (2000). The lottery paradox, knowledge, and rationality. The Philosophical Review,
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pollock, J. (1983). Epistemology and probability. Synthese,
Pollock, J. (1986). Contemporary theories of knowledge (1st ed.). Towota, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Vogel, J. (1990). Are there counterexamples to the closure principle? In M. Roth & G. Ross (Eds.), Doubting: Contemporary perspectives on skepticism (pp. 13–27). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. (2009). Reply to Hawthorne and Lasonen-Aarnio. In P. Greenough & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Williamson on knowledge (pp. 313–329). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. (forthcoming). Very improbable knowing. In T. Dougherty (Ed.), Evidentialism and its discontents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wright, C. (1985). Facts and certainty. Proceedings of the British Academy,