Date: 13 Nov 2011
Expressivism and plural truth
- Michael P. Lynch
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Contemporary expressivists typically deny that all true judgments must represent reality. Many instead adopt truth minimalism, according to which there is no substantive property of judgments in virtue of which they are true. In this article, I suggest that expressivists would be better suited to adopt truth pluralism, or the view that there is more than one substantive property of judgments in virtue of which judgments are true. My point is not that an expressivism that takes this form is true, but that it more readily accommodates the motivations that typically lead expressivists to their view in the first place.
Beall, J. (2000). On mixed inferences and pluralism about truth predicates. Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 380–382.CrossRef
Beall, J., & Restall, G. (2005). Logical pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blackburn, S. (1998). Ruling passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brink, D. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Capps, D., Lynch, M. P., & Massey, D. (2010). A coherent moral relativism. Synthese, 151(2008), 1–26.
Chrisman, M. (2008). Expressivism, inferentialism and saving the debate. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77(2), 334–358.CrossRef
Cotnoir, A. (2009). Generic truth and mixed conjunctions: Some alternatives. Analysis, 69(3), 473–479.
Damnjanovic, N. (2005). Deflationism and the success argument. Philosophical Quarterly, 58, 53–67.CrossRef
Dorsey, D. (2006). A coherence theory of truth in ethics. Philosophical Studies, 127(3), 493–523.CrossRef
Dreier, J. (2004). Meta-ethics and the problem of creeping minimalism. Philosophical Perspectives, 18(1), 23–44.CrossRef
Edwards, D. (2008). How to solve the problem of mixed conjunctions. Analysis, 68(2), 143–149.
Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings. A theory of normative judgement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Horwich, P. (1998). Truth (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Lynch, M. (2009). Truth as one and many. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Pedersen, N. (2006). What can the problem of mixed inferences teach us about alethic pluralism?’. The Monist, 89, 103–117.CrossRef
Pedersen, N. (2010). Stabilizing alethic pluralism. Philosophical Quarterly, 60, 92–108.CrossRef
Price, H. (2010). Naturalism without mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University press.
Price, H., & Macarthur, D. (2007). Pragmatism, quasirealism and the global challenge. In C. Misak (Ed.), The New Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richard, M. (2008). When truth gives out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Ridge, M. (2006). Ecumenical expressivism the best of both worlds? Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 2, 302–336.
Schroeder, M. (2008). Being for. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Schroeder, M. (2010). Noncognitivism in ethics. London: Routledge.
Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). A defense of moral realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Tappolet, C. (1997). Mixed inferences: A problem for pluralism about truth predicates. Analysis, 57(1997), 209–211.CrossRef
Timmons, M. (1999). Morality without foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wright, C. (1992). Truth and objectivity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wright, C. (1995). Truth in ethics. Ratio, 8, 209–226.CrossRef
- Expressivism and plural truth
Volume 163, Issue 2 , pp 385-401
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Frege–Geach problem
- Michael P. Lynch (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, University of Connecticut, U-2054, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA