Philosophical Studies

, Volume 162, Issue 2, pp 201–217

The distinctive feeling theory of pleasure


DOI: 10.1007/s11098-011-9755-9

Cite this article as:
Bramble, B. Philos Stud (2013) 162: 201. doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9755-9


In this article, I attempt to resuscitate the perennially unfashionable distinctive feeling theory of pleasure (and pain), according to which for an experience to be pleasant (or unpleasant) is just for it to involve or contain a distinctive kind of feeling. I do this in two ways. First, by offering powerful new arguments against its two chief rivals: attitude theories, on the one hand, and the phenomenological theories of Roger Crisp, Shelly Kagan, and Aaron Smuts, on the other. Second, by showing how it can answer two important objections that have been made to it. First, the famous worry that there is no felt similarity to all pleasant (or unpleasant) experiences (sometimes called ‘the heterogeneity objection’). Second, what I call ‘Findlay’s objection’, the claim that it cannot explain the nature of our attraction to pleasure and aversion to pain.


PleasurePainDesireMotivationValuingDan Haybron

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia