Philosophical Studies

, Volume 162, Issue 2, pp 119–141

Phenomenal conservatism, classical foundationalism, and internalist justification

Authors

    • Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Iowa
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11098-011-9751-0

Cite this article as:
Hasan, A. Philos Stud (2013) 162: 119. doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9751-0

Abstract

In “Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism” (2007), “Phenomenal Conservatism and the Internalist Intuition” (2006), and Skepticism and the Veil of Perception (2001), Michael Huemer endorses the principle of phenomenal conservatism, according to which appearances or seemings constitute a fundamental source of (defeasible) justification for belief. He claims that those who deny phenomenal conservatism, including classical foundationalists, are in a self-defeating position, for their views cannot be both true and justified; that classical foundationalists have difficulty accommodating false introspective beliefs; and that phenomenal conservatism is most faithful to the central internalist intuition. I argue that Huemer’s self-defeat argument fails, that classical foundationalism is able to accommodate fallible introspective beliefs, and that classical foundationalism has no difficulty accommodating a relatively clear internalist intuition. I also show that the motivation for phenomenal conservatism is less than clear.

Keywords

Phenomenal conservatism Classical foundationalism Internalist justification Fallible foundational beliefs Michael Huemer

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011