Mark Schroeder’s Hypotheticalism: agent-neutrality, moral epistemology, and methodology
- Tristram McPherson
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Mark Schroeder’s Slaves of the Passions is the most systematic defense yet constructed of a broadly ‘Humean’ conception of normative reasons for action, according to which all of one’s reasons are ultimately explained by facts about one’s psychology. This, however, radically undersells the book, which is breathtaking in its scope, originality, and density of powerful ideas. So: if you care about deep questions in ethics, you should read it. It is also rhetorically Humean, written so engagingly that even those without prior interest in its subject may enjoy thinking through such a superb example of philosophical argument.
Despite admiring much in this book, I will play the usual role of symposium commentator here, and focus on sketching three brief objections to Schroeder’s account, in the hopes that they will spur him to develop and clarify his views. Section 1 argues that Schroeder’s crucial account of agent-neutral reasons cannot be made to work. Section 2 argues that a core element o
- Boyd, R. (1997). How to be a moral realist. In S. Darwall, A. Gibbard, & P. Railton (Eds.), Moral discourse and practice (pp. 105–136). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Hume, D. (2007). In D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton (Eds.), A treatise of human nature (Vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Schroeder, M. (2007). Slaves of the passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Mark Schroeder’s Hypotheticalism: agent-neutrality, moral epistemology, and methodology
Volume 157, Issue 3 , pp 445-453
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota Duluth, 361 A. B. Anderson Hall, 1121 University Drive, Duluth, MN, 55812, USA