Abstract
Content externalism is the dominant view in the philosophy of mind. Content essentialism, the thesis that thought tokens have their contents essentially, is also popular. And many externalists are supporters of such essentialism. However, endorsing the conjunction of those views either (i) commits one to a counterintuitive view of the underlying physical nature of thought tokens or (ii) commits one to a slightly different but still counterintuitive view of the relation of thought tokens to physical tokens as well as a rejection of realist physicalism. In this essay I reveal the problem and articulate and adjudicate among the possible solutions. I will end up rejecting content essentialism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams F. (1993). ‘Fodor’s Modal Argument’. Philosophical Psychology 6: 41–56 .
Adams F. and Aizawa K. (1994). `Fodorian Semantics’. In: (eds) Mental Representations, pp 223–242. Basil Blackwell, Oxford .
Adams F., Drebushenko D., Fuller G. and Stecker R. (1990). ‘Narrow Content: Fodor’s Folly’. Mind and Language 5: 213–229 .
Adams F. and Fuller G. (1992). ‘Names, Contents and Causes’. Mind and Language 7: 205–221 .
Burge T. (1979). `Individualism and the Mental’. In: (eds) Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Studies in Metaphysics, pp 73–122. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis .
Burge T. (1982). `Other Bodies’. In: (eds) Thought and Object, pp 97–120. Oxford University Press, New York .
Burge T. (1986). ‘Individualism and Psychology’. The Philosophical Review 95: 3–45 .
Burge T. (1992). ‘Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950–1990’. Philosophical Review 101: 3–51 .
Burge T. (1993). ‘Mind-Body Causation and Explanatory Practice’. In: (eds) Mental Causation, pp 97–120. Oxford University Press, New York .
Butler K. (1996). ‘Content, Causal Powers and Context’. Philosophy of Science 63: 105–114 .
Chalmers D. (2003). ‘The Nature of Narrow Content’. Philosophical Issues 13: 46–66 .
Clark A. and Chalmers D. (1998). ‘The Extended Mind’. Analysis 58: 10–23 .
Davidson D. (1987). ‘Knowing Ones Own Mind’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60: 441–458 .
Dennett D. (1987). The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge .
Fine K. (2003). ‘The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter’. Mind 112: 195–234 .
Fodor J. (1987). Psychosemantics. MIT Press, Cambridge .
Fodor J. (1990). A Theory of Content and Other Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge .
Fodor J. (1991). ‘A Modal Argument for Narrow Content’. Journal of Philosophy 88: 5–26 .
Frances B. (1999). ‘On the Explanatory Deficiencies of Linguistic Content’. Philosophical Studies 93: 45–75 .
Gibbons J. (1993). ‘Identity Without Supervenience’. Philosophical Studies 70: 59–79 .
Jackson F. and Pettit P. (1988). ‘Functionalism and Broad Content’. Mind 97: 381–400 .
Jackson F. and Pettit P. (1993). Some Content is Narrow. In: (eds) Mental Causation, pp 259–282. Oxford University Press, New York .
Kaplan D. (1990). ‘Words’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64: 93–119 .
Lewis D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell, Oxford .
Loar B. (1987a). ‘Subjective Intentionality’. Philosophical Topics 15: 89–124 .
Loar B. (1987b). ‘Names in Thought’. Philosophical Studies 51: 169–185 .
Loar B. (1988a). ‘Social Content and Psychological Content’. In: (eds) Contents of Thought, pp 99–109. University of Arizona Press, Tucson .
Loar B. (1988b). ‘Two Kinds of Content’. In: (eds) Contents of Thought, pp 121–139. University of Arizona Press, Tucson .
MacDonald C. (1990). ‘Weak Externalism and Mind-Body Identity’. Mind 99: 387–404 .
McGinn C. (1982). ‘The Structure of Content’. In: (eds) Thought and Object, pp 207–258. Oxford University Press, New York .
Olson E. (2001). ‘Material Coincidence and the Indiscernability Problem’. Philosophical Quarterly 51: 337–355 .
Owens J. (1987). ‘In Defense of a Different Doppelgänger’. The Philosophical Review 96: 521–554 .
Owens J. (1990). ‘Cognitive Access and Semantic Puzzles’. In: (eds) Propositional Attitudes, pp 147–174. CSLI Press, Palo Alto, CA .
Owens J. (1992). ‘Psychophysical Supervenience: Its Epistemological Foundation’. Synthese 90: 89–117 .
Rowlands M. (1992). ‘Externalism and Token–Token Identity’. Philosophia 22: 359–375 .
Saidel E. (1994). ‘Content and Causal Powers’. Philosophy of Science 61: 658–665 .
Seager W. (1992). ‘Externalism and Token Identity’. The Philosophical Quarterly 42: 439–448 .
Stalnaker R. (1990). ‘Narrow Content’. In: (eds) Propositional Attitudes, pp 131–146. CSLI Press, Palo Alto, CA .
Wiggins D. (1968). ‘On Being in the Same Place at the Same Time’. Philosophical Review 77: 90–95 .
Wiggins D. (1980). Sameness and Substance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge .
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frances, B. Externalism, Physicalism, Statues, and Hunks. Philos Stud 133, 199–232 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-8446-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-8446-9