Skip to main content
Log in

Linguistic competence and expertise

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Questions about the relationship between linguistic competence and expertise will be examined in the paper. Harry Collins and others distinguish between ubiquitous and esoteric expertise. Collins places considerable weight on the argument that ordinary linguistic competence and related phenomena exhibit a high degree of expertise. His position and ones which share close affinities are methodologically problematic. These difficulties matter because there is continued and systematic disagreement over appropriate methodologies for the empirical study of expertise. Against Collins, it will be argued that the term ‘expertise’ should be reserved for expertise (esoteric experts) and exclude everyday performance (ubiquitous experts). Wittgensteinian ideas will be employed to maintain that it is mistaken and misleading to derive substantive conclusions about the epistemology of expertise from ordinary linguistic competence and vice versa. Significant attention will be devoted to the notion of following a rule with particular reference to the intelligibility of tacit rule following. A satisfactory theoretical approach to expertise should not involve making important claims about ordinary linguistic competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addis, M. (2001). D.Z. Phillips’ fideism in Wittgenstein’s mirror. In R. Arrington & M. Addis (Eds.), Wittgenstein and philosophy of religion (pp. 85–100). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G., & Hacker, P. (1994). Rules, grammar and necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bix, B. (1995). Law, language and legal determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (2002). Wittgenstein, rules and institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (1981). Knowledge in practice. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cianciolo, A., Matthew, C., Sternberg, R., & Wagner, R. (2006). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, and expertise. In K. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 613–632). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2001a). Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2001b). What is tacit knowledge? In T. Schatzki, K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 107–119). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2007). Bicycling on the moon: collective tacit knowledge and somatic-limit tacit knowledge. Organization Studies, 28(2), 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2011). Three dimensions of expertise. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (in press)

  • Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H., & Kusch, M. (1998). The shape of actions: what humans and machines can do. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1984). Cognitive wheels: the frame problem of AI. In C. Hookway (Ed.), Minds, machines and evolution: philosophical studies (pp. 129–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (2000). Democracy, expertise, and AIDS treatment activism. In D. Kleinman (Ed.), Science, technology and democracy (pp. 15–32). New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P. (1993). Wittgenstein: meaning and mind, part I—essays. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. (1990). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1972). The blue and brown books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1984). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Addis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Addis, M. Linguistic competence and expertise. Phenom Cogn Sci 12, 327–336 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9211-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9211-5

Keywords

Navigation