Adams, A., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14
Adams, A., & Aizawa, K. (2008). Defending the bounds of cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21
Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. New York: Routledge.
Bechtel, W. (2009a). Explanation: mechanism, modularity, and situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 155–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bechtel, W. (2009b). Looking down, around, and up: mechanistic explanation in psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 22
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: a mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2010). Dynamic mechanistic explanation: computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an exemplar for cognitive science. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2011). Complex biological mechanisms: cyclic, oscillatory, and autonomous. In C. A. Hooker (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: vol. 10. Philosophy of complex systems. New York: Elsevier.
Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (2010). Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original 1993 edition published by Princeton University Press)
Bickle, J. (2003). Philosophy and neuroscience: a ruthlessly reductive account
. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRef
Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain: mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Clarendon.
De Jaegher, H. (2009a). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousness and Cognition, 18
De Jaegher, H. (2009b). What made me want the cheese? A reply to Shaun Gallagher and Dan Hutto. Consciousness and Cognition, 18
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.
De Jaegher, H., & Froese, T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14
Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4
Di Paolo, E. (2009a). Editorial: The social and enactive mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8
Di Paolo, E. (2009b). Extended Life. Topoi, 28
Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & Iizuka, H. (2008). Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas in Psychology, 26
Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2011). Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & D. Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–88). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8
Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. (2010). Modeling social interaction as perceptual crossing: an investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connection Science, 22
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8
Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S. (1999). Early socio-emotional development: contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 101–136). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Huebner, B. (2008). Do you see what we see? An investigation of an argument against collective representation. Philosophical Psychology, 21
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67
McGann, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: enacting social perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8
Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers. In T. Field & N. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 177–197). Norwood: Ablex.
Rupert. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101(8), 389–328.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, E., & Stapleton, M. (2008). Making sense of sense-making: reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi, 28
Torrance, S., & Froese, T. (2011). An inter-enactive approach to agency: participatory sense-making, dynamics, and sociality. Humana.Mente, 15, 21–53.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.