Skip to main content
Log in

Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents an interview method which enables us to bring a person, who may not even have been trained, to become aware of his or her subjective experience, and describe it with great precision. It is focused on the difficulties of becoming aware of one’s subjective experience and describing it, and on the processes used by this interview technique to overcome each of these difficulties. The article ends with a discussion of the criteria governing the validity of the descriptions obtained, and then with a brief review of the functions of these descriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreas, C., & Andreas, T. (1991). Aligning perceptual positions: A new distinction in NLP. Anchor Point, 5(2), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). Patterns of the hypnotic techniques of Milton H. Erickson. Capitola, CA: Meta Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K. S. (1984). On being unconsciously influenced and informed. In S. Bowers & D. E. Meichenbaum (Eds.), The unconscious reconsidered (pp. 227–272). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, W., Reese, E., & Reese, R. (1997). Eye movement as an indicator of sensory components in thought. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(3), 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calbris, G. (2003). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. (1996/1989). Memory in the real world. New York: Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraz, N., Varela, F., & Vermersch, P. (2003). On becoming aware. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilts, R. (1983). Roots of NLP. Capitola, CA: Meta Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilts, R. (1998). Modeling with NLP. Capitola, CA: Meta Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilts, R., Grinder, J., Bandler, R., & Delozier, J. (1980). Neuro-linguistic programming: The study of the structure of subjective experience, vol 1. Capitola, CA: Meta Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1986). Mind over machine. The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of computer. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, J. L. (1983). Representational systems and eye movements in an interview. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 303, 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2003). Valid and non-reactive verbalization of thoughts during performance of tasks. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984/1993). Protocol analysis. Verbal protocols as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galin, D., & Ornstein, R. (1974). Individual differences in cognitive style and reflective eye movements. Neuropsychologia, 12, 376–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2003a). Complexities in the first-person perspective: Comments on Zahavi’s self-awareness and alterity. Research in Phenomenology, 32, 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2003b). Phenomenology and experiential design. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. (1962/1997). Experiencing and the creation of meaning. Northwestern University Press.

  • Gendlin, E. (1996). Focusing oriented psychotherapy. New York: The Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. (2004). Introduction to thinking at the edge. http://www.focusing.org.

  • Grinder, J., Delozier, J., & Bandler, R. (1977). Patterns of the hypnotic techniques of Milton Erickson, vol 2. Capitola, CA: Meta Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume, P. (1932). Manuel de psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusdorf, G. (1950/1993). Mémoire et personne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2001). Telling what we know: Describing inner experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 400–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2004). To beep or not to beep. Obtaining accurate reports about awareness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(7–8), 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1913/1950). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1925/1962). Phänomenologische psychologie (Husserliana, vol IX). La Havre: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack, A., & Roepstorff, A. (Eds.) (2003). Trusting the subject? Part 1. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack, A., & Roepstorff, A. (Eds.) (2004). Trusting the subject? Part 2. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(7–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne, M. (1972). Eye and head turning indicates cerebral lateralization. Science, 179, 539–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Van Quyen, M., Martinerie, J., Navarro, V., Boon, P., D’Havé, M., Adam, C., et al. (2001a). Anticipation of epileptic seizures from standard EEG recordings. The Lancet, 357, 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Van Quyen, M., Martinerie, J., Navarro, V., Baulac, M., & Varela, F. (2001b). Characterizing the neuro-dynamical changes prior to seizures. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 18, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Van Quyen, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2002). Neuronal dynamics and conscious experience: An example of reciprocal causation before epileptic seizures. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle, F. (1985). The effect of eye placement on orthographic memorization, PhD Thesis, Faculté des Sciences Sociales, Université de Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.

  • Lutz, A. (2002). Toward a neurophenomenology of generative passages: A first empirical case study. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 133–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, W. (1986). The disappearance of introspection. London: Bradford Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, A. J. (2003). Introspective report. Trust, self-knowledge and science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinerie, J., Adam, C., Le Van Quyen, M., Baulac, M., Clémenceau, S., Renault, B. et al. (1998). Epileptic seizures can be anticipated by non-linear analysis. Nature Medicine, 4, 1173–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1953). Éloge de la philosophie. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M (1964/1996). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are non verbal? Psychological Review, 92(3), 350–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gesture reveals about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1882/1961). Auguste comte and positivism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1982/1999). Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (second edition). New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organising consciousness: A framework for implicit learning. In R. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, computational and philosophical consensus in the making (pp. 41–67). New York: Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin, C. (2001). L’expérience intuitive. Préface de Francisco Varela. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin, C. (2005). Un exemple de recherche neuro-phénoménologique, l’anticipation des crises d’épilepsie. Intellectica, 2005/2, 40, 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin, C. (2006). Towards the source of thoughts. The gestures and transmodal dimension of lived experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies (in press).

  • Petitmengin, C., Navarro, V., & Baulac, M. (2006). Seizure anticipation: Are neuro-phenomenological approaches able to detect preictal sysmptoms? Epilepsy and Behavior, 9(2), 298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin-Peugeot, C. (1999). The intuitive experience. In F. Varela & J. Shear (Eds.), The view from within (pp. 43–77). Exeter: Academic-Imprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1974a). La prise de conscience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1974b). Réussir et comprendre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platon (1981a). Le Sophiste. Œuvres complètes, tome 2. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platon (1981b). Ménon. Œuvres complètes, tome 1. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1947). L’invention mathématique. In Science et Méthode. Paris: Flammarion, 43–63.

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Library of Congress.

  • Proust, M. (1929/1987). A la recherche du temps perdu. Paris: Laffont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge, an essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot (1881). Les maladies de la mémoire. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1950). Philosophie de la volonté. Paris: Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1936). L’imagination. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1938). Esquisse d’une théorie des emotions. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Cambridge: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(8), 339–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., & Schreiber, C. A. (2004). Experience, meta-consciousness, and the paradox of introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(7–8), 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2004). Introspective training apprehensively defended. Reflections on Titcheners’s lab manual. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(7–8), 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. (1995). The motherhood constellation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1899). A primer of psychology, rev. edn. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1901–1905). Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory practice. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (Eds.) (1999a). The view from within. First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. London: Imprint Academic.

  • Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (1999b). First-person methodologies: What, why, how? In F. Varela & J. Shear (Eds.), The view from within (pp. 1–14). Exeter: Imprint-Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermersch, P. (1994/2003). L’entretien d’explicitation. Paris: Éditions ESF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermersch, P. (1996). Pour une psychophénoménologie. Expliciter no 13.

  • Vermersch, P. (1997a). Approche du singulier. Expliciter no 18.

  • Vermersch, P. (1997b). La référence à l’expérience subjective. Revue phénoménologique Alter, no 5.

  • Vermersch, P. (1999). Introspection as practice. In F. Varela & J. Shear (Eds.), The view from within (pp. 17–42). Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermersch, P. (2000a). Conscience directe et conscience réfléchie. Intellectica 2000/2(31), 269–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermersch, P. (2000b). Questions sur le point de vue en première personne. Expliciter no 35.

  • Vermersch, P. (2004). Prendre en compte la phénoménalité: Propositions pour une psychophénoménologie. Expliciter no 57.

  • Wallace, A. (1999). The Buddhist tradition of Shamatha: Methods for refining and examining consciousness. In F. Varela & J. Shear (Eds.), The view from within (pp. 175–187). Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. (2003). Buddhist with an attitude: The Tibetan seven-point mind-training. Snow Lion Publications.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1992). Investigations philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Petitmengin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petitmengin, C. Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenom Cogn Sci 5, 229–269 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-006-9022-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-006-9022-2

Key words

Navigation