Skip to main content
Log in

Terminology, the importance of defining

  • Commentary
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple terms and definitions exist to describe specific aspects of pharmacy practice and service provision. This commentary explores the reasons for different interpretations of words and concepts in pharmaceutical care and pharmacy practice research. Reasons for this variation can be found in language, culture, profession and may also depend on developments over time. A list of words is provided where the authors think that currently multiple interpretations are possible. To make sure that the reader understands the essence, it seems imperative that authors include a definition of the topics that they actually study in their papers, and that they clearly cite existing definitions or refer to collections of definitions such as existing glossaries. It is important that presenters, authors and reviewers of pharmacy practice papers pay more attention to this aspect of describing studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernàndez D, Fernandez-Llimos F, Benrimoj SI. Defining professional pharmacy services in community pharmacy. Res Soc Admin Pharm. 2013;9(6):989–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June 1946, and entered into force on 7 April 1948.

  3. Üstün B, Jakob R. Calling a spade a spade: meaningful definitions of health conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:802.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Awofeso N. Re-defining health. http://www.who.int/bulletin/bulletin_board/83/ustun11051/en/. Last Accessed 26 Dec 2015.

  5. Charter professionalism of the pharmacist. KNMP, the Hague, 2012. https://www.knmp.nl/praktijkvoering/professionaliteit/handvest-van-de-apotheker-1/charter-professionalism-of-the-pharmacist/at_download/file_1. Last Accessed 20 Dec 2015.

  6. van Mil JWF, McElnay JC, de Jong-van den Berg LTW, Tromp TFJ. The challenges of defining pharmaceutical care on an international level. Int J Pharm Pract. 1999;7:202–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farris KB, Kirking DM. Assessing the quality of pharmaceutical care. II. Application of concepts of quality assessment from medical care. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27(2):215–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bungay KM, Wagner AK. Assessing the quality of pharmaceutical care [letter; comment]. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27(12):1542–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad-Nieuws. UMCG participeert in apotheek aan A15 [UMCG participates in pharmacy aling the A15]. 20-2-2015 http://www.pw.nl/nieuws/nieuwsberichten/2015/umcg-participeert-in-apotheek-a15. Last Accesses 26 Dec 2015.

  10. Martins SA, van Mil JWF, F Alves da Costa. The organizational framework of community pharmacies in Europe. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37(5):896–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes CM, et al. Provision of pharmaceutical care by community pharmacists: a comparison across Europe. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:472–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan EC, Stewart K, Elliot RA. J George Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2014;10:608–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Mil JWF. Pharmaceutical care, the future of pharmacy [Dissertation]. Groningen, Groningen University, 1999. Chapter 8: the chances for pharmaceutical care. p. 152–153.

  14. European Union of Medical Specialities. http://www.uems.eu/about-us/presentation. Last Accessed 16 Mar 2016.

  15. Rotta I, Salgado TM, Felix DC, Souza TT, Correr CJ, Fernandez-Llimos F. Ensuring consistent reporting of clinical pharmacy services to enhance reproducibility in practice: an improved version of DEPICT. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:584–90. doi:10.1111/jep.12339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mikael RL, Brown TR, Lazarus HL, Vinson MC. Quality of pharmaceutical care in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1975;32:567–74.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Allemann SS, van Mil JW, Botermann L, Berger K, Griese N, Hersberger KE. Pharmaceutical care: the PCNE definition 2013. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;6(3):544–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vrijens B, De Geest S, Hughes DA, Przemyslaw K, Demonceau J, Ruppar T, et al. A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;73(5):691–705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Buetow SA, Sibbald B, Cantrill JA, Halliwell S. Appropriateness in health care: application to prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(2):261–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Mil JW, Franklin BD. Defining clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical care. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(3):137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. ACCP. The definition of clinical pharmacy. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(6):816–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. NHS Choices. Counselling. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Counselling/Pages/Introduction.aspx. Last Accessed 14 Jan 2016.

  23. Basger BJ, Moles RJ, Chen TF. Application of drug-related problem (DRP) classification systems: a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(7):799–815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bulajeva A, Labberton L, Leikola S, Pohjanoksa-Mantilla M, Geurts MME, de Gier JJ, et al. Medication review practices in European countries. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10(5):731–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Mil JW, Fernandez-Llimos F. What is ‘pharmaceutical care’ in 2013? Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(1):1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pintor-Mármol A, Baena MI, Fajardo PC, Sabater-Hernández D, Sáez-Benito L, García-Cárdenas MV, et al. Terms used in patient safety related to medication: a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(8):799–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. International Pharmaceutical Federation. FIP and patient safety glossary of terms. http://www.fip.org/files/fip/FIP%20and%20PATIENT%20SAFETY%20GLOSSARY%20for%20web.pdf. Last Accessed 14 Jan 2016.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. W. Foppe van Mil.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Mil, J.W.F., Henman, M. Terminology, the importance of defining. Int J Clin Pharm 38, 709–713 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0294-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0294-5

Keywords

Navigation