Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of teachers’ expectations on principals’ implementation of a new teacher evaluation policy in Flemish secondary education

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation process of teacher evaluation policy is often problematic. In this regard, it is crucial to understand principals’ sensemaking of teacher evaluation policy since their understandings influence the implementation process. While a growing body of research shows that principals strongly shape teachers’ policy understanding, little is known about the way principals’ sensemaking is influenced by teacher expectations about new policy. This qualitative study, drawn from interviews with principals and teachers in 13 secondary schools, indicates that the new teacher evaluation policy in Flanders (Belgium) is implemented by principals and supported by teachers in various ways. The findings of this study show this was the result of the process of discrepancy reduction between the initial standards principal set and the expectations that teachers had for the implementation of the policy. These findings underscore the complexity of teacher evaluation and help policy makers to understand that “the best” implementation of the teacher evaluation policy probably does not exists. Moreover, this offers important insights for principals in how they best lead the implementation of teacher evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anagnostopoulos, D., & Rutlegde, S. A. (2007). Making sense of school sanctioning policies in urban high schools: charting the depth and drift of school and classroom change. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1261–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1992). Subject departments and the ‘implementation’ of national curriculum policy: an overview of the issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change. Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: the management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 289–320). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Collings, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, P. (2007). The professionalization of instructional leadership in the United States: competing values and current tensions. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 196–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: a control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cardno, C. (2001). Managing dilemmas in appraising. In D. Middlewood & C. Cardno (Eds.), Managing teacher appraisal and performance: a comparative approach (pp. 143–159). London: Routlegde Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sense-making about reading: how teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: school leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., & Weiss, J. A. (1993). The interplay of social science and prior knowledge in public policy. In H. Redner (Ed.), Studies in the thought of Charles E. Lindblom (pp. 210–234). CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, S.A., Bradshaw, L.K., & Joyner, R.L. (2002). Teacher evaluation: a review of literature. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Coldren, A. F., & Spillane, J. P. (2007). Making connections to teaching practice: the role of boundary practices in instructional leadership. Educational Policy, 21, 369–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosner, S. (2011). Teacher learning, instructional considerations and principal communication: lessons from a longitudinal study of collaborative data use by teachers. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39(5), 568–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., Ellet, C. D., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership, and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 287–301.

  • Department of Education (2007) Omzendbrief omtrent fucntiebeschrijving en evaluatie. (Letter to the schools about job descriptions and evaluation). Department of Education: Brussels.

  • Devos, G., Verhoeven, J., Stassen, K., & Warmoes, V. (2004). Personeelsbeleid in Vlaamse scholen (Personnel policy in Flemish schools). Mechelen: Wolters Plantyn.

  • Evans, A. E. (2007). School leaders and their sensemaking about race and demographic change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 159–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, M. A. (2012). The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: How do teachers experience it at school? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, P. B., & Tallerico, M. (1998). Accountability and city school leadership. Education and Urban Society, 30, 546–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–41). New York: MacMillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, R., Kelley, C., & Kimball, S. (2004). Implementing teacher evaluation systems: how principals make sense of complex aritifacts to shape local instructional practice. In W. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Educational administration, policy and reform: research and measurement research and theory in educational administration (pp. 153–188). Greenwich: Information Age Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, W. C., & Pigford, A. B. (2002). The principal’s role in educational policy implementation. Contemporary Education, 72, 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelchtermans, G. (2007). Macropolitics caught up in micropolitics: the case of the policy on quality control in Flanders Belgium. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 471–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, S. (2000), Empirically grounded construction of types and typologies in qualitative social research, Forum Qualitative Social Research. Retrieved from: http://qualitative-research.net/fps

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership, 4, 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, A. C. (2000). Reform in the making: the implementation of social policy in prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Febey, K., & Schroeder, R. (2005). State-mandated accountability in high schools: teachers’ interpretations of a new aera. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 77–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlewood, D., & Cardno, C. (2001). Managing teacher appraisal and performance. A comparative approach. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.

  • Morgado, J. C., & Sousa, F. (2010). Teacher evaluation, curricular autonomy and professional development: trends and tentionsin the Portugese educational policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(3), 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Pry, S. C., & Schumacher, G. (2012). New teachers’ perceptions of a standards-based performance appraisal system. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 325–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovando, M. N., & Ramirez, A. (2007). Principals’ instructional leadership within a teacher performance appraisal system: enhancing students’ academic success. Journal of Personnel Evaluation, 20, 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retallick, J., & Fink, D. (2002). Framing leadership: contributions and impediments to educational change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnema, C. E. L., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). The Leadership of Teaching and Learning: Implications for Teacher Evaluation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 319–343.

  • Smit, B. (2005). Teachers, local knowledge, and policy implementation: a qualitative policypractice inquiry. Education and Urban Society, 37, 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (1998). A cognitive perspective on the LEA’s role in implementing instructional policy: accounting for local variability. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(1), 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: district policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 141–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. (2002a). Managing in the middle: school leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002b). Policy implementation and cognition: reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. (1997). Teacher learning in a social context: integrating collaborative and institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 155–192). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. (1995). Balancing individual and institutional goals in educational personnel evaluation: a conceptual framework. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21(2), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J., & Tucker, P. (1999). The politics of teacher evaluation: a case study of new system design and implementation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. O., & Ilgen, D. R. (1984). Individuals’ reactions to performance feed-back in organizations: a control theory perspective. In G. Ferris & K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 81–124). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. S., & Robinson, V. M. (1997). The problem of policy implementation:the case of performance appraisal. School Leadership and Management, 17, 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., & Ashford, S. J. (1994). Adaptive self-regulation: a process view of managerial effectiveness. Journal of Management, 20(1), 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Ashford, S. J., Clair, L. S., & Xin, K. R. (1995). Dealing with discrepant expectations: response strategies and managerial effectiveness. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1515–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2009). Teachers’ perception of the new teacher evaluation policy: A validity study of the Policy Characteristcs Scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 924–930.

  • Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2010). The influence of school leadership on teachers’ perception of teacher evaluation policy. Educational Studies, 36, 521–536.

  • Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2012). Importance of system and leadership in performance appraisal. Personnel Review, 41(6), 756–776.

  • Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2014). The problematic implementation of teacher evaluation policy: School failure or governmental pitfall? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4 Suppl.), 155–174.

  • van den Berg, R., Vandenberghe, R., & Sleegers, P. (1999). Management of innovations from a cultural-individual perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 321–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Washingtion: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (2000). Social mindscapes: an invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge: Havard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Pedagogical Sciences, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Eva Vekeman, Geert Devos & Melissa Tuytens

Authors
  1. Eva Vekeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geert Devos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melissa Tuytens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Vekeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vekeman, E., Devos, G. & Tuytens, M. The influence of teachers’ expectations on principals’ implementation of a new teacher evaluation policy in Flemish secondary education. Educ Asse Eval Acc 27, 129–151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-014-9203-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-014-9203-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation