Abstract
Since the 1920’s many researchers have conducted studies exploring the qualities of good teachers. However, a limited number of empirical studies have been conducted in the People’s Republic of China (hereafter called China). The current study has two objectives. The first one aims to compare a good teacher’s characteristics in China and the USA. To achieve this, qualitative data of a good teacher’s characteristics were collected in China. The results obtained from China were then compared to those reported in the USA. The second objective was to test whether or not there are differences among teachers’, students’ and parents’ perceptions of a good teacher’s characteristics in China. To achieve this, questionnaires were administered, and then statistical analyses were conducted. The qualitative data analyses have revealed four themes about the characteristics of good Chinese teachers: Teacher ethics, professional skills, professional development, and students’ test scores. The ANOVAs have found no differences among teachers’, students’ and parents’ perceptions of the qualities of good teachers in China on most of the items. This study helps readers better understand good teachers in a Chinese context and provides a framework for future comparative study between China and the USA regarding the qualities of good teachers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Askew, M., Rhodes, V., Brown, M., William, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: Report of a study carried out for the Teacher Training Agency. London: King’s College London, School of Education.
Beishuizen, J. J., Hof, E., Putten, C. M., Bouwmeester, S., & Asscher, J. J. (2001). Students’ and teachers’ cognitions about good teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 185–201.
Brookover, W. B., & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, College of Education, Michigan State University.
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328–375). New York: MacMillan.
Campbell, R. J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R. D., & Robinson, W. (2003). Differential teacher effectiveness: towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 347–362.
Campbell, R. J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R. D., & Robinson, W. (2004). Assessing teacher effectiveness: Developing a differentiated model. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Corbett, D., & Wilson, B. (2002). What urban students say about good teaching? Educational Leadership, 60(1), 18–22.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1996). Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In H. Coleman (Eds.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 169–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1997). Effective schools and effective teachers: An international perspective. Warwick: University of Warwick.
Cruickshank, D. R., & Haefele, D. (2001). Good teachers, plural. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 26–30.
Feng, Z. (2002). On the transition of teacher evaluation mechanism in the context of quality education. Journal of Shengyan Teacher College, 26(2), 10–12.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Givvin, K. B., Garnier, H., Smith, M., et al. (2005). Math teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111–132.
Jiang, F. H. (2001). Modern educational evaluation: Theory technology, and methods. China: Guangdong People Press.
Jiang, F. H., & Zhang, Q. L. (2003). Some thoughts on teacher evaluation in the context of the curriculum reform for basic education. Educational Guiding Journal, 5, 40–43.
Kutnick, P., & Junes, V. (1993). Pupils’ perceptions of a good teacher: a developmental perspective from Trinidad and Tobago. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 400–413.
Kyriakides, L., & Campbell, R. J. (2003). Teacher evaluation in cyprus: some conceptual and methodological issues arising from teacher and school effectiveness research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17, 21–40.
LeTendre, G., Baker, D., Akiba, M., Goesling, B., & Wiseman, A. (2001). Teachers’ work: institutional isomorphism and cultural variation in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Educational Researcher, 30(6), 3–15.
Li, R. (2002). New ideas on teacher evaluation. Modern Elementary and Secondary Education, 6, 53–55.
Li, R., & Xuan, L. (2003). Limitation and transcendence on teacher evaluation. Educational Science Research, 3, 22–24.
Ling, R. (2001). Exploration of professional development of excellent middle school teachers in China. Journal of Cahngshu College, 6, 26–30.
Liu, S. (2006). School effectiveness research in the People’s Republic of China. A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Liu, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation and curriculum reform in the People’s Republic of China: ongoing developments. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(3), 243–261.
Liu, S., & Teddlie, C. (2005). A follow-up study on teacher evaluation in the People’s Republic of China: historical analysis and latest trends. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18(4), 253–272.
Meng, L., & Liu, S. (2008). Mathematics teacher stress in Chinese secondary schools. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 8(1), 73–96.
Murphy, P. K., Delli, L. A., & Edwards, M. N. (2004). The good teacher and good teaching: comparing beliefs of second-grade students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 69–92.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Polk, J. A. (2006). Traits of effective teacters. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), 23–29.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000). The processes of school effectiveness. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The International handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 135–159). London: Falmer.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Emergence in sociology: contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 551–585.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.
Shao, G., & Hao, D. (2002). A cognition study of young teachers and excellent teachers. Teacher Education Research, 14(5), 22–27.
Shi, K. (2005). A comparative study of psychological qualities of excellent teachers from the perspective sof middle school studnets, preservice teachers and inservice teachers. Theory and Practice of Education, 25(8), 55–59.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Shulman, L. S. (2000). Teacher development: roles of domain expertise and pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 129–135.
Stronge, H. J. (2007). Qualities of effective teachers (2nd ed.). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Stronge, H. J., & Hindmean, J. L. (2003). Hiring the best teachers. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 48–52.
Stronge, H. J., & Tucker, P. D. (2003). Handbook on teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance. Larchmont: Eye On Education.
Stronge, H. J., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2007). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 165–184.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Teddlie, C. (1999). Report on the psychometric properties of the attitudinal and behavioral instruments used in the SEAP-II site visits, SY 1996–97 and SY 1997–98. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Department of Education.
Tuckman, B. (1995). Assessing effective teaching. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(2), 127–138.
Weinstein, C. (1989). Teacher education students’ perceptions of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 53–60.
Ying, P. C., & Fan, G. R. (2001). Case study on teacher evaluation patterns: on the limitations of traditional pattern of teacher evaluation and exploration of a new pattern. Theory and Practice of Education, 21(3), 22–25.
Zhu, S. (2004). Analysis of forming cause of excellent teachers’ competence and the discussions on teachers’ training. Journal of Hunan First Normal College, 4(4), 121–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Meng, L. Perceptions of teachers, students and parents of the characteristics of good teachers: a cross-cultural comparison of China and the United States. Educ Asse Eval Acc 21, 313–328 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9077-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9077-z