Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is experience the best teacher? A multilevel analysis of teacher characteristics and student achievement in low performing schools

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated several teacher characteristics, with a focus on two measures of teaching experience, and their association with second grade student achievement gains in low performing, high poverty schools in a Mid-Atlantic state. Value-added models using three-level hierarchical linear modeling were used to analyze the data from 1,544 students, 154 teachers, and 53 schools. Results indicated that traditional teacher qualification characteristics such as licensing status and educational attainment were not statistically significant in producing student achievement gains. Total years of teaching experience was also not a significant predictor but a more specific measure, years of teaching experience at a particular grade level, was significantly associated with increased student reading achievement. We caution researchers and policymakers when interpreting results from studies that have used only a general measure of teacher experience as effects are possibly underestimated. Policy implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Title I is a federal program that is designated to specific schools with high percentages of poor students and provides schools additional funding opportunities to assist students in meeting academic benchmarks.

  2. We refer to readily measured characteristics that form a teacher’s credentials and not teacher behaviors, attitudes, and practices.

  3. Highly qualified teachers are defined as those teachers having at least a bachelor’s degree, full state certification or licensure, and proof that they know the subject they teach (U.S. Department of Education, 2004).

  4. Gains resulting from teacher experience were larger in the area of mathematics.

  5. Over 12 schools only received the RF grant beginning 2006.

References

  • Akiba, M., LeTendre, G., & Scribner, J. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36, 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K., & Entwisle, D. (1988). Achievement in the first two years of school: Patterns and processes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53(2).

  • Birman, B., Le Floch, K., Klekotka, A., Ludwig, M., Taylor, J., Walters, K., et al. (2007). State and local implementation of the NCLB Act: Volume II- Teacher quality under NCLB: Interim report. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on August 1, 2008, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1283/.

  • Boyd, D., Goldhaber, D., Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2007). The effects of certification and preparation on teacher quality. The Future of Children, 17, 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Increasing the effectiveness of teachers in low-performing schools. In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 535–550). Routledge.

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, A. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croninger, R., Rice, J., Rathbun, A., & Masako, N. (2007). Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 26, 312–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. (1995). A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity, or gender matter? American Economic Review, 95, 158–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. (2008). Teachers matter, but effective teacher quality policies are elusive. In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 146–165). Routledge.

  • Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2007). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? National board certification as a signal of effective teaching. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1996). Evaluating the effect of teacher degree level on educational performance. In W. Fowler (Ed.), Developments in school finance (pp. 197–210). Washington, DC: NCES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1998). When should we reward degrees for teachers? Phi Delta Kappan, 134–138.

  • Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (2001). Evaluating the evidence on teacher certification: A rejoinder. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1994). Looking in classrooms (6th ed.). New York, NY: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, R., Hedges, L., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 3, 361–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. The Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. The Journal of Political Economy, 100, 84–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt Assessment, Inc. (2004). Stanford reading first: Technical data report. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, F., & Moon, T. (2008). Reading First’s impact on reading outcomes on second grade students: One county’s experience in a Mid-Atlantic state. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY. (March).

  • Ingersoll, R. (2002). Holes in the teacher supply bucket. School Administrator, 59(3), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (2007). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study: Teacher Questionnaire. Retrieved February 25, 2009, from http://timss.bc.edu/TIMSS2007/PDF/T07_TeacherQ_G4.pdf.

  • Johnson, F., & Cornman, S. (2008). Findings from the Pilot Teacher Compensation Survey: School year 2005–06 (NCES 2008-440). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, D.C. Retrieved July 5, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2008440.

  • Kainz, K., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2007). The ecology of early reading development for children in poverty. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 407–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. (2006). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. NBER Working Paper Series, Vol. w12155. Retrieved March 5, 2008 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=896463.

  • Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, C., & Ratledge, E. (1979). Student perceptions, I. Q. and achievement. The Journal of Human Resources, 14, 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madaus, G., Kellaghan, T., Rakow, E., & King, D. (1979). The sensitivity of measures of school effectiveness. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 207–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. (2007). Using action research and local models of instruction to enhance teaching. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, W. A., Tollerud, T. R., & Langeveldt, W. (1990). Teacher beliefs regarding career ladders and merit pay. Education, 110, 535–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2003). Student background and teacher effects on achievement and attainment in mathematics: A longitudinal study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, M., & Chang, F. (2008). The elusive relationship between teacher characteristics and student academic achievement growth: A longitudinal multilevel model for change. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R., & Phillips, B. (1981). Learning by doing, vintage, and selection: Three pieces of the puzzle related to teaching experience and teaching performance. Economics of Education Review, 1, 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otaiba, S., Kosanovich-Grek, M., Torgesen, J., Hassler, L., & Wahl, M. (2005). Reviewing core kindergarten and first-grade reading programs in light of No Child Left Behind: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first grade: The importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C., Livingston, R., & Willson, V. (2006). Measurement and assessment in education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  • Rowan, B. (2004). Teachers matter: Evidence from value-added assessments. Research Points. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. (1997). Using research on employees’ performance to study the effects of teachers on students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 256–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Research Progress Report. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. (2001). Teacher retention and attrition from public schools: Evidence from SASS91. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D.C.: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J., Ward, T., Tucker, P., & Hindman, J. (2008). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, A., & Wolfe, B. (1977). Do schools make a difference? The American Economic Review, 67, 639–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education. (2004). New No Child Left Behind flexibility: Highly qualified teachers. Retrieved July 5, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html. March.

  • Wayne, A., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wöβmann, L. (2005). Europe’s schools. Education Policy, 445–504.

  • Word, E., Johnson, J., Bain, H., Fulton, D., Zaharias, J., Lintz, M., et al. (1990). Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR): Tennessee’s K-3 class-size study. Nashville, TN: Tennessee State Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis L. Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, F.L., Moon, T.R. Is experience the best teacher? A multilevel analysis of teacher characteristics and student achievement in low performing schools. Educ Asse Eval Acc 21, 209–234 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9074-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9074-2

Keywords

Navigation