Skip to main content
Log in

Solving security constrained optimal power flow problems by a structure exploiting interior point method

  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present a new approach to solve the DC (n − 1) security constrained optimal power flow (SCOPF) problem by a structure exploiting interior point solver. Our approach is based on a reformulation of the linearised SCOPF model, in which most matrices that need to be factorized are constant. Hence, most factorizations and a large number of back-solve operations only need to be performed once. However, assembling the Schur complement matrix remains expensive in this scheme. To reduce the effort, we suggest using a preconditioned iterative method to solve the corresponding linear system. We suggest two main schemes to pick a good and robust preconditioner based on combining different “active” contingency scenarios of the SCOPF model. These new schemes are implemented within the object-oriented parallel solver (OOPS), a structure-exploiting primal-dual interior-point implementation. We give results on several SCOPF test problems. The largest example contains 500 buses. We compare the results from the original interior point method (IPM) implementation in OOPS and our new reformulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsac O, Stott B (1974) Optimal load flow with steady-state security. IEEE Trans PAS 93(3):745–751. doi:10.1109/TPAS.1974.293972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsac O, Bright J, Prais M, Stott B (1990) Further development in lp-based optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 5(3):697–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman A, Gondzio J (1999) Regularized symmetric indefinite systems in interior point methods for linear and quadratic optimization. Optim Methods Softw 11/12(1–4):275–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Capitanescu F, Glavic M, Ernst D, Wehenkel L (2007) Interior-point based algorithms for the solution of optimal power flow problems. Electr Power Syst Res 77(5–6):508–517. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2006.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier J (1962) Contribution à à l’Étude du dispatching Économique. Bulletin de la Société Françise des Électricit 3:431–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommel H, Tinney W (1968) Optimal power flow solutions. IEEE Trans PAS 87:1866–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub GH, van Loan CF (1983) Matrix computations. North Oxford Academic, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gondzio J, Grothey A (2009) Exploiting structure in parallel implementation of interior point methods for optimization. Comput Manag Sci 6(2):135–160

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karoui K, Platbrood L, Crisciu H, Waltz R (2008) New large-scale security constrained optimal power flow program using a new interior point algorithm. In: Electricity market (EEM) 2008. 5th international conference on European, pp 1–6. doi:10.1109/EEM.2008.4579069

  • Kelley CT (1995) Iterative methods for linear and nonlinear equations. Frontiers in applied mathematics, vol 16. SIAM, Philadelphia

  • Kirschen DS, Strbac G (2004) Fundamentals of power system economics. Wiley, Hoboken

  • Petra C, Anitescu M (2010) A preconditioning technique for Schur complement systems arising in stochastic optimization. Technical report of Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, to appear in computational optimization and applications, preprint ANL/MCS-P1748-0510

  • Qiu W, Flueck A, Tu F (2005) A new parallel algorithm for security constrained optimal power flow with a nonlinear interior point method. In: Power engineering society general meeting, 2005, IEEE, vol 1, pp 447–453. doi:10.1109/PES.2005.1489574

  • Quintana V, Torres G, Medina-Palomo J (2000) Interior-point methods and their applications to power systems: a classification of publications and software codes. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(1):170–176. doi:10.1109/59.852117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott B, Jardim J, Alsaç O (2009) DC power flow revisited. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24:1290–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trodden PA, Bukhsh WA, Grothey A, McKinnon KIM (2013) MILP formulation for controlled islanding of power networks. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 45(1):501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei H, Sasaki H, Yokoyama R (1996) An application of interior point quadratic programming algorithm to power system optimization problems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11(1):260–266. doi:10.1109/59.486104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ (1997) Primal-dual interior-point methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia

  • Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sanchez CE, Thomas RJ (2011) MATPOWER: steady-state operations, planning and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the anonymous referees and the journal editors, whose many useful suggestions have significantly improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naiyuan Chiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiang, N., Grothey, A. Solving security constrained optimal power flow problems by a structure exploiting interior point method. Optim Eng 16, 49–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-014-9250-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-014-9250-1

Keywords

Navigation