Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization for unsteady viscous flows

  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an adjoint method for the multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization of unsteady viscous flows. The goal is to introduce a Mach number variation into the Non-Linear Frequency Domain (NLFD) method and implement a novel approach to present a time-varying cost function through a multi-objective adjoint boundary condition. The paper presents the complete formulation of the time dependent optimal design problem. The approach is firstly demonstrated for the redesign of a helicopter rotor blade in two-dimensional flow and in three-dimensional viscous flow, the technique is employed to validate and redesign the NASA Rectangular Supercritical Wing (RSW).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

b :

Boundary velocity component

c :

Airfoil chord length

c a :

Axial force coefficient

c n :

Normal force coefficient

D,d:

Artificial dissipation flux

f :

Flux vector

f v :

Viscous flux vector

F :

Numerical flux vector

F v :

Numerical viscous flux vector

\({\mathcal{G}}\) :

Gradient

\(\bar{\mathcal{G}}\) :

Smoothed gradient

H :

Enthalpy

i,j:

Cell indices

I :

Cost function

k :

Wave number

ℒ:

Objective function

M :

Mach number

M :

Freestream Mach number

ℳ:

Objective function at final time

N :

Number of Fourier modes

p :

Pressure

p :

Freestream pressure

R :

Residual

\(\hat{R}\) :

Fourier coefficient of residual

s :

Surface arc length

\({\mathcal{S}}\) :

Shape function

S :

Face areas of computational cell

T :

Time period

t :

Time

t * :

Pseudo time

u :

Velocity (physical domain)

V :

Cell volume

w :

State vector

\(\hat{w}\) :

Fourier coefficient of state vector

x :

Coordinates (physical domain)

α :

Angle of attack

α m :

Maximum angle of attack

α o :

Mean angle of attack

θ :

Coefficient for implicit smoothing technique

κ :

Coefficient of thermal conductivity

Λ:

Spectral radius of the flux Jacobian

λ :

Second coefficient of viscosity

μ :

Coefficient of viscosity

ν :

Coefficient for artificial dissipation flux

ξ :

Coordinates (computational domain)

ρ :

Density

σ :

Viscous stress

τ :

Pseudo time

ψ :

Lagrange multiplier

\(\hat{\psi}\) :

Fourier coefficient of Lagrange multiplier

ω r :

Reduced frequency

ϖ :

Weights for cost functions

References

  • Adamczyk JJ (1984) Model equation for simulating flows in multistage turbomachinery. NASA Technical Memorandum 86869, November 1984. Technical report

  • Anderson WK, Venkatakrishnan V (1999) Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. Comput Fluids 28(4–5):443–480

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet RM, Walker CE (1999) Computational test cases for a rectangular supercritical wing undergoing pitching oscillations. Technical report, NASA/TM-1999-209130, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, April 1999

  • Duta MC, Giles MB, Campobasso MS (2002) The harmonic adjoint approach to unsteady turbomachinery design. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 40:323–332

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot J, Peraire J (1996) Aerodynamic design using unstructured meshes. AIAA Paper 96-1941

  • Gallman J, Reuther J, Pfeiffer N, Forrest W, Bernstorf D (1996) Business jet wing design using aerodynamic shape optimization. In: 34th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1996. AIAA Paper 96-0554

  • Giles MB, Duta M, Muller J, Pierce N (2003) Algorithm developments for discrete adjoint methods. AIAA J 15(5):1131–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall KC, Thomas JP, Clark WS (2000) Computation of unsteady nonlinear flows in cascades using a harmonic balance technique. In: 9th international symposium on unsteady aerodynamics, aeroacoustics and aeroelasticity of turbomachines, Lyon, France, September 2000. Technical report

  • Jameson A (1989) Computational aerodynamics for aircraft design. Science 245:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson A (1991) Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings. In: AIAA 10th computational fluid dynamics conference, Honolulu, HI, June 1991. AIAA paper 91-1596

  • Jameson A, Vassberg JC (1999) Studies of alternative numerical optimization methods applied to the brachistochrone problem. In: OptiCON 99

  • Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E (1981) Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods with Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes, January 1981. AIAA Paper 81-1259

  • Kasidit L, Jameson A (2004) Case studies in aero-structural wing planform and section optimization. In: 22nd AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Providence, RI, August 2004. AIAA Paper 2004-5372

  • Kim H, Nakahashi K (2005) Unstructured adjoint method for Navier-Stokes equations. JSME Int J Ser B Fluids Therm Eng 48(2):202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavriplis D (2006) Multigrid solution of the discrete adjoint for optimization problems on unstructured meshes. AIAA J 44:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen M (2003) The application of non-linear frequency domain methods to the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. PhD dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, March 2003

  • McMullen M, Jameson A, Alonso J (2001) Acceleration of convergence to a periodic steady state in turbomachinery flows. In: 39th aerospace sciences meething and exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2001. AIAA Paper 01-0152

  • McMullen M, Jameson A, Alonso J (2002) Application of a non-linear frequency domain solver to the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. In: 40th aerospace sciences meething and exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2002. AIAA Paper 02-0120

  • Message passing interface forum (1994) MPI: a message-passing interface standard, May 1994. Available from http://www.mcs.anl.gov/Projects/mpi/index.html

  • Mohammadi B, Pironneau O (2005) Shape optimization in fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:255–279

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah S (2003) The discrete adjoint approach to aerodynamic shape optimization. PhD dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, January 2003

  • Nadarajah S, Jameson A (2000) A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization. In: 38th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2000. AIAA paper 2000-0667

  • Nadarajah S, Jameson A (2001) Studies of the continuous and discrete adjoint approaches to viscous automatic aerodynamic shape optimization. In: 15th computational fluid dynamics conference, Anaheim, CA, June 2001. AIAA paper 2001-2530

  • Nadarajah S, Jameson A (2002) Optimal control of unsteady flows using a time accurate method. In: 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Atlanta, GA, September 2002. AIAA Paper 2002-5436

  • Nadarajah S, Jameson A, Alonso JJ (2002) An adjoint method for the calculation of remote sensitivities in supersonic flow. In: 40th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2002. AIAA Paper 2002-0261

  • Nadarajah S, McMullen M, Jameson A (2003) Optimum shape design for unsteady flows using time accurate and non-linear frequency domain methods. In: 16th computational fluid dynamics conference, Orlando, FL, June 2003. AIAA Paper 2003-3875

  • Nadarajah S, McMullen M, Jameson A (2006) Non-linear frequency domain method based optimum shape design for unsteady three-dimensional flows. In: AIAA 44th aerospace sciences meething and exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2006. AIAA Paper 2006-1052

  • Nemec M, Zingg D, Pulliam TH (2004) Multipoint and multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization. AIAA J 42(6):1057–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen E, Lu J, Park MA, Darmofal D (2004) An implicit, exact dual adjoint solution method for turbulent flows on unstructured grids. Comput Fluids 33(9):1131–1155

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reuther J, Cliff S, Hicks R, van Dam CP (1992) Practical design optimization of wing/body configurations using the Euler equations. AIAA Paper 92-2633

  • Reuther J, Alonso JJ, Martins JRRA, Smith SC (1999) A coupled aero-structural optimization method for complete aircraft configurations. In: 37th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1999. AIAA Paper 99-0187

  • Soto O, Lohner R, Yang C (2004) An adjoint-based design methodology for cfd problems. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 14(6):734–759

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JP, Hall KC, Dowell EH (2003) A discrete adjoint approach for modelling unsteady aerodynamic design sensitivities. In: 41th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2003. AIAA Paper 03-0041

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siva K. Nadarajah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadarajah, S.K., Tatossian, C. Multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization for unsteady viscous flows. Optim Eng 11, 67–106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-008-9036-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-008-9036-4

Keywords

Navigation