Abstract
In recent years, the study of policy advisory systems has been advanced conceptually and analytically through studies of externalisation and politicisation. Still, the understanding of institutional variation in how organisations supply policy advice remains limited. The contribution adds to recent research on think and the study of policy advice by arguing for a focus on the dissemination of policy advice by asking how the dissemination activities of think tanks vary across different policy advisory systems and what this implies for the study of policy advice. This question is explored in a quantitative design which compares publications, events and newspaper mentionings of samples of think tanks from a coordinated (Germany), liberal (UK) and mixed (Denmark) system in 2012. The analysis indicates that think tanks in the UK have the highest level of dissemination on all three activities when controlled for the number of full-time staff. The study indicates that factors beyond the policy process such as developments of funding and media environments should be analysed further as they are likely to be important for how and where think tank disseminate their policy advice.
References
Berry, J. M. (1997). The interest group society. New York: Longman.
Bertelli, A. M., & Wenger, J. B. (2009). Demanding information: Think tanks and the US congress. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 225–242.
Binderkrantz, A. S., P. M. Christiansen, and H. H. Pedersen, 2014, Organisationer i politik. Danske interesseorganisationer i forvaltning, Folketing og medier, Hans Reitzels Forlag, 246 p.
Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
Boucher S., et al. (2004). Europe and its think tanks: A promise to be fulfilled. An analysis of think tanks specialised in European policy issues in the enlarged European Union, Studies and Research, Paris, Notre Europe.
Braml, J. (2006). U.S. and German think tanks in comparative perspective: German. Policy Studies, 3, 222–267.
Brooks, S., Stasiak, D., & Tomasz, Z. (Eds.). (2013). Policy Expertise in Contemporary Democracies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, J. L., Hall, J. A., & Pedersen, O. K. (2006). National identity and the varieties of capitalism (Vol. xiv). Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2014). The national origins of policy ideas: Knowledge regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Christiansen, P. M., & Nørgaard, A. S. (2003). Faste Forhold—Flygtige Forbindelser. Stat og interesseorganisationer i Danmark i det 20. Århundrede. Magtudredningen: Gylling, Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Cigler, A. J., & Loomis, B. A. (Eds.). (1998). Interest group politics. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
Craft, J. (2015). Conceptualizing the policy work of partisan advisers. Policy Sciences, 48(2), 135–158.
Craft, J., & Howlett, M. (2012). Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: Location and content in policy advisory systems. Journal of Public Policy, 32, 79–98.
Craft, J., & Howlett, M. (2013). The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: The impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice. Policy and Society, 32, 187–197.
Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (1998). British think-tanks and the climate of opinion. London: UCL Press.
Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (2004). A ‘hollowed-out’ tradition? British think tanks in the twenty-first century. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions. Policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (2006). ‘What Works’? British Think Tanks and the ‘End of Ideology’. The Political Quarterly, 77, 156–165.
Dror, Y. (1984). Required breakthroughs in think tanks. Policy Sciences, 16, 199–225.
EU Transparency Register (2013). Statistics for register—Transparency Register.
Florian, D. (2013). Think Tank Directory Deutschland. http://www.thinktankdirectory.org/.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halligan, J. (1995). Policy advice and the public sector. In G. B. Peters & S. T. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a changing environment (pp. 138–172). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174–199.
Hjarvad, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Abingdon: Routledge.
Howlett, M., & Migone, A. (2013). Searching for substance: Externalization, politicization and the work of Canadian policy consultants 2006–2013. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7, 112–133.
Hustedt, T. (2013). Analyzing policy advice: The case of climate policy in germany. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7, 88–111.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Kelstrup, J. D. (2014). Think tanks in Europe: Explaining their development and variation in Germany, the United Kingdom, Denmark and at the EU-level. Roskilde: Roskilde University.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign Affairs, 77, 81–94.
Köllner, P. (2011). Think tanks: Their development, global diversity and roles in international affairs, GIGA focus, Hamburg, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies—Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien.
Lance Bennett, W., & Entman, R. M. (2001). Medaited politics: Communication in the future of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier Publishing.
Leeson, P. T., Ryan, M. E., & Williamson, C. R. (2012). Think tanks. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40, 62–77.
McGann, J. (2005). US think-tanks: Casualties in the war of ideas. Open Democracy.
McGann, J. G. (2012). Global go-to think tank index report 2011. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
McGann, J. G. (2014). Global go-to think tank index report 2013. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Mcgann, J. G., & Sabatini, R. (2011). Global think tanks: Policy networks and governance. New York: Routledge.
McGann, J. G., & Weaver, R. K. (Eds.). (2000). Think tanks and civil societies: Catalysts for ideas and action. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Medvetz, T. (2012). Think tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Metz, J. (2013). Expert groups in the European Union: A sui generis phenomenon? Policy and Society, 32, 267–278.
Nachiappan, K. (2013). Think tanks and the knowledge—policy nexus in China. Policy and Society, 32, 255–265.
Parmar, I. (2013). The knowledge politics of democratic peace theory. International Politics, 50, 231–256.
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rich, A. (2004). Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise (xii ed.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–1053.
Sherrington, P. (2000). Shaping the policy agenda: Think tank activity in the European Union. Global Society, 14, 173–189.
Smith, J. A. (1991). The idea brokers: Think tanks and the rise of the new policy elite. New York: Free Press.
Stone, D. (2004). Introduction: Think tanks, policy advise and governance. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions—policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Stone, D. (2007). Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes. Public Administration, 85, 259–278.
Stone, D. (2013). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy nexus in the global agora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stone, D., & Denham, A. (Eds.). (2004). Think tank traditions—Policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Stone, D., Denham, A., & Garnet, M. (Eds.). (1998). Think tanks across nations: A comparative approach. Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press.
Think Tank Network Research (2013). Think tank network initiative, watch.
Thunert, M. W. (2004). Think tanks in Germany. Society Abroad, 41, 66–69.
Thunert, M. W. (2006). The development and significance of think tanks in Germany. German Policy Studies, 3, 185–221.
Ullrich, H. (2004). European Union think tanks: Generating ideas, analysis and debate. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press.
UNDP (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: From thought to policy. The role of think tanks in shaping government strategy: Experiences from Central and Eastern Europe, Bratislava, UNDP Regional Bureau for Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States.
Weiss, C. H. (Ed.). (1991). Organizations for policy analysis: Helping government think. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications Inc.
Wildavsky, A. B. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little-Brown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Measuring newspaper impact: search engines and representativity
Appendix: Measuring newspaper impact: search engines and representativity
Think tank media impact was searched in the media database LexisNexis which has 2169 newspaper sources available in ‘Nexis’ as of August 2013. Citations were searched in all languages. Unfortunately Nexis has an Anglophone bias in its sources. The database thus includes 648 newspapers in the UK, 71 in the Benelux countries, 69 in Germany, 40 in France and only 1 in Denmark. Furthermore, not all important newspapers are included. While it was impossible to eliminate the bias in newspaper sources, the very weak representation of Danish newspaper sources was corrected by using the Danish search engine Informedia to access the newspaper impact of Danish think tanks in the following 9 daily Danish Newspapers: Berlingske, BT, Børsen, Ekstra Bladet, Information, Jyllands-Posten, Kristeligt Dagblad, Politiken, Weekendavisen. All searches of media impact were performed from January 1st to December 31st in the year 2012. Think tanks were searched by keywords were searched in the whole text. Citations were filtered for close similarity with other sources to avoid duplications. Magazines, journals, newswires, press releases, newsletters blogs and web-based publications were discarded as sources because they challenge the temporal comparison of impact by over-representing the development in citations. Despite the increased importance and think tank focus on new and web-based media these sources were considered too unreliable to be used for any temporal assessment of media impact.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelstrup, J.D. Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK. Policy Sci 50, 125–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9254-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9254-0