Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive governance in water reform discourses of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin exemplifies complex governance challenges raised by large-scale trans-boundary river systems. The Basin contains a varied and fragmentary mosaic of human perspectives and practices, situated in a dynamic biophysical system that accounts for a significant portion of Australia’s agricultural produce and is home to diverse and iconic ecosystems. Severe drought, high river-flow variability, and persistent ecosystem degradation have been impetus for water policy reforms culminating in the highly contested 2012 Murray–Darling Basin Plan. We analyzed public-record content from opinion editorials and speeches by policy elites, 2010–2012, to examine public discourses and discourse coalitions associated with development of the Plan. We focus on three domains of discourse: definition of problems, promotion of solutions, and assertions of fact. Discourses illustrated divergent, exclusionary, and largely un-reconciled perspectives about how water resources should be managed, as well as how plural interests should be represented in decision-making. We identify discourse coalition-linked narrative scripts, develop an understanding of constitutive dynamics relevant to ongoing processes of policy development and implementation, and discuss implications for adaptive governance of water resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, R., Thieme, M. L., Revenga, C., Bryer, M., Kottelat, M., Bogutskaya, N., et al. (2008). Freshwater ecoregions of the world: A new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 58(5), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008a). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., et al. (2008b). Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(2), 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell, N. W. (1999). Climate change and global water resources. Global Environmental Change, 9, S31–S49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arup, T. (2013, February 27). State funding cuts to slash Murray–Darling work. Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/action/printArticle?id=4064539.

  • Ascher, W., Steelman, T. A., & Healy, R. G. (2010). Knowledge and environmental policy: Re-imagining the boundaries of science and politics. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS]. (2014). Gross value of irrigated agricultural production (cat. no. 4610.0.55.008). http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4610.0.55.008main+features52011-12.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics/Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics/Bureau of Rural Sciences [ABS/ABARE/BRS]. (2009). Socio-economic context for the MurrayDarling BasinDescriptive report. Murray–Darling Basin Authority Publication 34/09. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/Socio-economic-context-report5b2.pdf.

  • Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2010). Devolution of environment and resources governance: Trends and future. Environmental Conservation, 37(04), 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(01), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borschmann, G., & Phillips, S. (2015, June 22). Climate review promised after dispute with top water scientists. Radio National [radio broadcast]. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/climate-review-promised-after-dispute-with-top-water-scientists/6547394.

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. (Ed.). (2002). Finding common ground: Governance and natural resources in the American West. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D., & Lynch, A. H. (2010). Adaptive governance and climate change. Boston: American Meteorological Society.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D., Steelman, T. A., Coejuell, L., Cromley, C., & Edwards, C. (2005). Adaptive governance: Integrating science, policy, and decision making. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T. (2012, November 22). Address to National Press Club, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/minister/archive/burke/2012/tr20121122a.html.

  • Cai, W., Cowan, T., Briggs, P., & Raupach, M. (2009). Rising temperature depletes soil moisture and exacerbates severe drought conditions across southeast Australia. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(21), L21709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In K. N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. G. (2002). The policy process: A practical guide for natural resources professionals. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. G., & Cherney, D. (2013). Ecosystem management: A policy-oriented jurisprudence perspective. In K. Robbins (Ed.), The laws of nature: Reflections on the evolution of ecosystem management law and policy. Akron: University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. C., Mitchell, R. B., & Cash, D. W. (2006). Evaluating the influence of global environmental assessments. In R. B. Mitchell, W. C. Clark, D. W. Cash, & N. M. Dickson (Eds.), Global environmental assessments: Information and influence (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. G., Picard, C. H., & Hohl, A. M. (2015). A problem-oriented view of large-scale conservation. In S. G. Clark, A. M. Hohl, C. H. Picard, & E. Thomas (Eds.), Large-scale conservation in the common interest. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. G., & Wallace, R. L. (2015). Integration and interdisciplinarity: Concepts, frameworks, and education. Policy Sciences, 48(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder [CEWH]. (2013). Framework for determining Commonwealth environmental water use. Canberra: Commonwealth Environmental Water Office. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/7f9e9c2f-79cd-400e-a6ca-cdcf3cdb7012/files/cewh-framework.pdf.

  • Commonwealth Parliament [Cwlth]. (2007). Water Act 2007. Canberra: Department of the Attorney General, Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2014C00715.

  • Commonwealth Parliament [Cwlth]. (2015). Water Amendment Bill 2015. Canberra: Department of the Attorney General. http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/r5468_aspassed/toc_pdf/15080b01.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.

  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization [CSIRO]. (2008). Water availability in the MurrayDarling Basin: A report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO MurrayDarling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. Canberra: CSIRO. http://www.csiro.au/~/media/CSIROau/Flagships/Water%20for%20a%20Healthy%20Country%20Flagship/WholeOfBasinReport_WfHC_PDF%20Standard.pdf.

  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization [CSIRO], & Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) (2007). Climate change in Australia: Technical report. Canberra: CSIRO. http://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au/technical_report.php.

  • Connell, D. (2007). Water politics in the Murray–Darling Basin. Canberra: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, D. (2011a). Water reform and the federal system in the Murray–Darling Basin. Water Resources Management, 25(15), 3993–4003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, D. (2011b). The role of the Commonwealth environmental water holder. In D. Connell & R. Grafton (Eds.), Basin futures: Water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. Canberra: ANU E-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, D., & Grafton, R. Q. (2011). Water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. Water Resources Research, 47(12), W00G03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments [COAG]. (1994). Water Reform Framework Agreement. Canberra: COAG. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/6caa5879-8ebc-46ab-8f97-4219b8ffdd98/files/policyframework.pdf.

  • Council of Australian Governments [COAG]. (2004). Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative. Canberra: COAG. http://www.nwc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/24749/Intergovernmental-Agreement-on-a-national-water-initiative.pdf.

  • Crase, L., O’Keefe, S., & Dollery, B. (2013). Talk is cheap, or is it? The cost of consulting about uncertain reallocation of water in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Ecological Economics, 88, 206–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crase, L., Pagan, P., & Dollery, B. (2004). Water markets as a vehicle for reforming water resource allocation in the Murray–Darling Basin of Australia. Water Resources Research, 40(8), W08S05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. E., Harris, J. H., Hillman, T. J., & Walker, K. F. (2010). The sustainable rivers audit: Assessing river ecosystem health in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine & Freshwater Research, 61(7), 764–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dery, D. (1984). Problem definition in policy analysis. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, A. I., Beck, H. E., Crosbie, R. S., Jeu, R. A., Liu, Y. Y., Podger, G. M., et al. (2013). The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): Natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society. Water Resources Research, 49(2), 1040–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doremus, H. (2005). Science plays defense: Natural resource management in the Bush administration. Ecology Law Quarterly, 32, 249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a changing Earth system. British Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2010). Organizational transformation for sustainability: An integral metatheory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton-Taylor, A. (2015, September 29). Emotional first hearing of the Senate inquiry into the Murray–Darling Basin Plan. ABC Rural. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-29/mdb-senate-inquiry-begins-in-st-george/6813564.

  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, A. (2011). Developing purposeful and adaptive institutions for effective environmental water governance. Water Resources Management, 25(15), 4005–4018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontier Economics. (2010). Structural adjustment pressures in the irrigated agriculture sector in the MurrayDarling Basin: A report prepared for the MurrayDarling Basin Authority. MDBA/Frontier Economics Pty. Ltd. http://www.mdba.gov.au/kid/files/392-Frontier-Economics-2010-adjustment-report-Final-for-public-release.pdf.

  • Funtowicz, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & Ravetz, J. (1999). Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity. Environmental Issues Series. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. http://www.pedz.uni-mannheim.de/daten/edz-bn/eua/00/envissue09.pdf.

  • Garrick, D., Anderson, G., Connell, D., & Pittock, J. (2014). Federal rivers: Managing water in multi-layered political systems. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrick, D., Bark, R., Connor, J., & Banerjee, O. (2012). Environmental water governance in federal rivers: Opportunities and limits for subsidiarity in Australia’s Murray–Darling River Basin. Water Policy, 14(6), 915–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godden, L., Ison, R. L., & Wallis, P. J. (2011). Water governance in a climate change world: Appraising systemic and adaptive effectiveness. Water Resources Management, 25(15), 3971–3976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q. (2011). Economic costs and benefits of the proposed basin plan. In D. Connell & R. Grafton (Eds.), Basin futures: Water reform in the MurrayDarling Basin. Canberra: ANU E-Press. http://press.anu.edu.au//wp-content/uploads/2011/08/whole5.pdf.

  • Grafton, R. Q., Pittock, J., Davis, R., Williams, J., Fu, G., Warburton, M., et al. (2013). Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., Pittock, J., Williams, J., Jiang, Q., Possingham, H., & Quiggin, J. (2014). Water planning and hydro-climatic change in the Murray–Darling Basin. Australia. Ambio, 43(8), 1082–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, C. (2011). Why justice is important. In D. Connell & Q. Grafton (Eds.), Basin futures: Water reform in the MurrayDarling Basin. Canberra: ANU E-Press. http://press.anu.edu.au//wp-content/uploads/2011/08/whole5.pdf.

  • Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R., Hendricks, C. M., & Farqui, M. (2009). Environmental decision-making: Exploring complexity and context. Annadale: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendon, H. H., & Liebmann, B. (1990). A composite study of onset of the Australian summer monsoon. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 47(18), 2227–2240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10(2), 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R., Collins, K., Colvin, J., Jiggins, J., Roggero, P. P., Seddaiu, G., et al. (2011). Sustainable catchment managing in a climate changing world: New integrative modalities for connecting policy makers, scientists and other stakeholders. Water Resources Management, 25(15), 3977–3992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The Politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, H. A., Susskind, L. E., & Wallace, K. H. (2007). A dialogue, not a diatribe: Effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 49(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., Brown, V. A., & Dyball, R. (Eds.). (2005). Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford, R. T. (2000). Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecology, 25(2), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford, R. T., Walker, K. F., Lester, R. E., Young, W. J., Fairweather, P. G., Sammut, J., et al. (2011). A Ramsar wetland in crisis—The Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth, Australia. Marine & Freshwater Research, 62(3), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lach, D., Rayner, S., & Ingram, H. (2005). Taming the waters: Strategies to domesticate the wicked problems of water resource management. International Journal of Water, 3(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of the policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society: A framework for political inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., & Macdougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence for a free society: Studies in law, science, and policy (Vol. 1 and 2). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, M., Tweed, S., Van Dijk, A., & Timbal, B. (2012). A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray–Darling Basin. Global and Planetary Change, 80, 226–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D. (2001). The era of management is over. Ecosystems, 4(8), 758–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, A. H., Adler, C. E., & Howard, N. C. (2014). Policy diffusion in arid Basin water management: A Q method approach in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 1601–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, A. H., Griggs, D., Joachim, L., & Walker, J. (2013). The role of the Yorta Yorta people in clarifying the common interest in sustainable management of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Policy Sciences, 46(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, A. H., Tryhorn, L., & Abramson, R. (2008). Working at the boundary: Facilitating interdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, E. (1991). Wetland management goals—Wise use and conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 20, 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. (2007). Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. G., & Lynch, A. H. (2006). Time-slice analysis of the Australian summer monsoon during the late quaternary using the fast ocean atmosphere model. Journal of Quaternary Science, 21(7), 789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, D. J., & Clark, S. G. (2012). The discourses of incidents: Cougars on Mt. Elden and in Sabino Canyon, Arizona. Policy Sciences, 45(4), 315–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MEA]. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. (2009, December 15). Drought stricken families united by tragedy. The 7:30 Report [radio broadcast]. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2009/s2772750.htm.

  • Murray–Darling Basin Authority [MDBA]. (2010). Guide to the proposed basin plan. Canberra: MDBA. http://www.mdba.gov.au/kid/guide/.

  • Murray–Darling Basin Authority [MDBA]. (2011). Position paper on localism. Canberra: MDBA. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/MDBA-paper-on-localism.pdf.

  • Murray–Darling Basin Authority [MDBA]. (2012a). Basin Plan 2012. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012L02240.

  • Murray–Darling Basin Authority [MDBA]. (2012b). Explanatory statement: Basin Plan 2012. Canberra: MDBA. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/Basin-Plan/Explanatory-Statement-Nov2012.pdf.

  • Murray–Darling Basin Authority [MDBA]. (2012c). Regulation impact statement: Basin Plan, Water Act 2007. Canberra: MDBA. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/Basin-Plan/Basin-Plan-RIS-Nov2012.pdf.

  • Murray–Darling Basin Authority [MDBA]. (2014). MurrayDarling Basin water reforms: Framework for evaluating progress. Canberra: MDBA. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/Evaluation-Framework-final.pdf.

  • Murray–Darling Basin Commission [MDBC]. (2004). MurrayDarling Basin Commission annual report 20032004, Publication No. 68/04. Canberra: MDBC. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/archived/mdbc-governance-reports/2162-mdbc_annual_report_2003-04.pdf.

  • Murtagh, F., & Contreras, P. (2012). Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: An overview. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(1), 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, F., & Legendre, P. (2014). Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: Which algorithms implement ward’s criterion? Journal of Classification, 31(3), 274–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Water Commission [NWC]. (2009). Australian water reform 2009: Second biennial assessment of progress in implementation of the National Water Initiative. Canberra: NWC. http://archive.nwc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/8428/2009_BA_complete_report.pdf.

  • Natural Resources Commission [NRC]. (2009). Recommendations report: Riverina bioregion regional forest assessment. Sydney: New South Wales NRC. http://www.nrc.nsw.gov.au/forest-assessment-river-red-gum.

  • National Water Commission [NWC]. (2011). Australian water markets: Trends and drivers 200708 to 201011. Canberra: NWC. http://archive.nwc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/18986/NWC_6959-Trends-and-drivers.pdf.

  • National Water Commission [NWC]. (2013). MurrayDarling Basin Plan implementation: Initial report. Canberra: NWC. http://www.nwc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/29095/MDB-Plan-implementation-initial-report.pdf.

  • Neales, S. (2015, July 7). Farmers to voice pain on water cuts. The Australian. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/farmers-to-voice-pain-over-murraydarling-basin-water-cuts/news-story/0e9e1cc558e594ad03512e5b24130628?=.

  • Nelson, R., Howden, M., & Smith, M. S. (2008). Using adaptive governance to rethink the way science supports Australian drought policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(7), 588–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 21–64). Cambridge: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The American Economic Review, 100, 641–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overton, I. C., Colloff, M. J., Doody, T. M., Henderson, B., & Cuddy, S. M. (Eds.). (2009). Ecological outcomes of flow regimes in the MurrayDarling Basin: Report prepared for the National Water Commission by CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship. Canberra: CSIRO. https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP10048&dsid=DS6.

  • Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Sage University paper series on qualitative research methods (Vol. 50). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J., & Connell, D. (2010). Australia demonstrates the planet’s future: Water and climate in the Murray–Darling Basin. Water Resources Development, 26(4), 561–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J., & Finlayson, C. M. (2011). Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: Freshwater ecosystem conservation options in an era of climate change. Marine & Freshwater Research, 62(3), 232–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (2001). Environmental economics and the Murray–Darling River System. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(1), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, W. M. (1988). International incidents: Introduction to a new genre in the study of international law. In W. M. Reisman & A. R. Willard (Eds.), International incidents: The law that counts in international politics (pp. 3–23). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K., & Ralph, T. J. (Eds.). (2011). Floodplain wetland biota in the Murray–Darling Basin: Water and habitat requirements. Melbourne: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saintilan, N., & Overton, I. (Eds.). (2010). Ecosystem Response Modeling in the Murray–Darling Basin. Melbourne: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H. W. (1994). How much Europe? Subsidiarity, centralization and fiscal competition. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41(1), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2006). Rethinking transboundary waters: A critical hydropolitics of the Mekong Basin. Political Geography, 25(2), 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, T. (2015). Adaptive governance. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. (2005). Deliberative methods for understanding environmental systems. BioScience, 55(11), 976–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. A. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelein, L. (2005). From Mabo to Yorta Yorta: Native title law in Australia. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 19, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelein, L. (2009). Compromised jurisprudence: Native title cases since Mabo. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, A. L. (1993). Subsidiarity in post-Maastricht Europe. The Political Quarterly, 64(2), 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbal, B. (2009). The continuing decline in South-East Australian rainfall: Update to May 2009. CAWCR Research Letters, 2, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timbal, B., & Drosdowsky, W. (2013). The relationship between the decline of Southeastern Australian rainfall and the strengthening of the subtropical ridge. International Journal of Climatology, 33(4), 1021–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of theories of social psychology: (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, M., Bischoff-Mattson, Z., & Clark, S. (2015). Discourses of Elk Hunting and Grizzly Bear Incidents in Grand Teton National Park. Wyoming: Human Dimensions of Wildlife. doi:10.1080/10871209.2016.1099766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidot, A., & Iggulden, T. (2015, October 14). Crossbench senators, agricultural producers in alliance to change how MurrayDarling river system is managed. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-14/murray-darling-alliance-senators-agricultural-producers/6854570.

  • Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467(7315), 555–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, P. J., & Ison, R. L. (2011). Appreciating institutional complexity in water governance dynamics: A case from the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resources Management, 25(15), 4081–4097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. (1997). Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology, 1(2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J., & Holling, C. S. (1990). Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology, 71(6), 2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., & Hendon, H. H. (2007). Sensitivity of Australian rainfall to inter-El Nino variations. Journal of Climate, 20(16), 4211–4226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H, Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, J. K. (2009). Murray river country: An ecological dialogue with traditional owners. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. A. (1989). The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork. Policy Sciences, 22(2), 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth Group. (2011). Statement on the 2011 Draft MurrayDarling Basin Plan. Sydney: Wentworth Group. http://wentworthgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Statement-on-the-2011-Draft-Basin-Plan.pdf.

  • Wheeler, S., Garrick, D., Loch, A., & Bjornlund, H. (2013). Evaluating water market products to acquire water for the environment in Australia. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S., Loch, A., Zuo, A., & Bjornlund, H. (2014). Reviewing the adoption and impact of water markets in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 518, 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor Report. (2011). Of drought and flooding rains: Inquiry into the impact of the guide to the MurrayDarling Basin Plan. Report by the House of Representatives, Standing Committee on Regional Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth Parliament. http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=ra/murraydarling/report/fullreport.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work would not have been possible without valuable discussion and insight from David Mattson. Thanks also to two anonymous reviewers for their comments and encouragement. This work has been supported by Brown University, and the generous gift from Larry Shulman and Rhonda Rochambeau.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary Bischoff-Mattson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bischoff-Mattson, Z., Lynch, A.H. Adaptive governance in water reform discourses of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Policy Sci 49, 281–307 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9245-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9245-1

Keywords

Navigation