Date: 07 Jul 2012
Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study examines the network structure of policy learning in the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, which is a network of the world’s largest cities committed to tackling climate change issues. Among forty members and nineteen affiliate members, we ask the question with whom do cities learn and why? How are policy-learning relationships associated with cities’ multi-stakeholder governing body, policy performance, and cultural similarities? While studies on learning have analyzed conditions facilitating learning, quantitative studies of local government learning in global networks are rare. To facilitate the investigation into learning, we conceptualize learning as a process comprising information seeking, adoption and policy change, and focus on information seeking as the foundation step in the learning process. This social network analysis using the exponential random graph model reveals the cities that seek information and those that are information sources are different subgroups. Furthermore, analysis of nodal attributes suggests that transmunicipal learning in the C40 network is facilitated by the presence of a multi-stakeholder governing body; homophily of culture (language and regional proximity); and higher level of climate change policy performance. Creating a multi-stakeholder governing body could ensure participatory representativeness from citizens and relevant stakeholders to enhance climate change policy engagement and decision making as well as policy learning.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2001). Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 995–1018.CrossRef
Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275–294.CrossRef
Benz, A., & Furst, D. (2002). Policy learning in regional networks. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(1), 21–35.CrossRef
Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2003). Cities and climate change: Urban sustainability and global environmental governance. London, NY: Routledge.
Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2004). Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The cities for climate protection program. International Studies Quarterley, 48, 471–493.CrossRef
Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445.CrossRef
Busenberg, G. J. (2001). Learning in organizations and public policy. Journal of Public Policy, 21(2), 173–189.CrossRef
Carlsson, L. (2000). Policy networks as collective action. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 502–520.CrossRef
Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of co-operation: Managing alliances, networks and joint ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
C40 Cities (2011). C40 cities: an introduction. http://www.c40cities.org/. Accessed 20 April 2011.
Cross, R., Rice, R. E., & Parker, A. (2001). Information seeking in social context: Structural influences and receipt of information benefits. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, 31(4), 438–448.CrossRef
de Leon, P., & Varda, D. M. (2009). Toward a theory of collaborative policy networks: Identifying structural tendencies. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 59–74.CrossRef
Depledge, J. (2006). The opposite of learning: Ossification in the climate change regime. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5–24.CrossRef
Edmondson, A. C. (1997). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5–28.CrossRef
Feiock, R. C., Lee, I. W., Park, H. J., & Lee, K.-H. (2010). Collaboration networks among local elected officials: Information, commitment, and risk aversion. Urban Affairs Review, 46(2), 241–262.CrossRef
Fiorino, D. J. (2001). Environmental policy as learning: A new view of an old landscape. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 322–334.CrossRef
Flynn, B., & Kroger, L. (2003). Can policy learning really improve implementation? Evidence from Irish responses to the water framework directive. European Environment, 13, 150–163.CrossRef
Gabler, M. (2010). Norms, institutions and social learning: An explanation for weak policy integration in the WTO’s committee on trade and environment. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 80–117.CrossRef
Glasbergen, P. (1996). Learning to manage the environment. In W. M. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Guo, R. (2007). Linguistic and religious influences on foreign trade: Evidence from East Asia. Asian Economic Journal, 21(1), 101–121.CrossRef
Haas, P. M. (2000). International institutions and social learning in the management of global environmental risks. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 558–575.CrossRef
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRef
Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M., & Morris, M. (2008). statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(1).
Henry, A. D. (2009). The challenge of learning for sustainability: A prolegomenon to theory. Research in Human Ecology, 16(2), 131–140.
Henry, A. D., Lubell, M., & McCoy, M. (2011). Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: the case of California regional planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 419–444.CrossRef
Howlett, M. (2002). Do networks matter? Linking policy network structure to policy outcomes: evidence from four Canadian policy sectors 1990–2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 235–267.CrossRef
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.CrossRef
Hunter, D. R., Handcock, M. S., & Butts, C. T. (2008). ergm: A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family model for networks. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(3).
ICLEI (2011). ICLEI climate program. http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=800. Accessed 18 April 2011 2011.
James, T. E., & Jorgensen, P. D. (2009). Policy knowledge, policy formulation, and change: Revisiting a foundational question. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 141–162.CrossRef
Johnson, B., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2001). Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge? Paper presented at the DRUID Winter Conference January 18–20 2001.
Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.CrossRef
KPMG, Hendriksen, B., de Boer, Y., Copius Peereboom, E., Jansen, S., & Ballantine, J. (2011). CDP Cities 2011: Global report on C40 Cities. London, Amsterdam: Carbon Disclosure Project.
Krause, R. M. (2011). Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US Cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33, 45–60.CrossRef
Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), 487–513.CrossRef
Leemans, R., & Eickhout, B. (2004). Another reason for concern: Regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change. Global Environmental Changes, 14, 219–228.CrossRef
Lipschutz, R. D. (1997). From place to planet: Local knowledge and global environmental governance. Global Governance, 3, 83–102.
Marsden, G., Frick, K. T., May, A. D., & Deakin, E. (2011). How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America. Transport Policy, 11, 501–512.CrossRef
Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48, 4–21.CrossRef
Mattes, R., & Bratton, M. (2007). Learning about democracy in Africa: Awareness, performance, and experience. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 192–217.CrossRef
May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331–354.CrossRef
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRef
Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nowlin, M. C. (2011). Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends. Policy Studies Journal, 39(S1), 41–60.CrossRef
Radaelli, C. M. (2009). Measuring policy learning: regulatory impact assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1145–1164.CrossRef
Rashman, L., Downe, J., & Hartley, J. (2005). Knowledge creation and transfer in the Beacon scheme: Improving services through sharing good practice. Local Government Studies, 31(5), 683–700.CrossRef
Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 463–494.CrossRef
Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3–30.CrossRef
Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168.CrossRef
Scholz, J. T., & Stiftel, B. (2005). Introduction. In J. T. Scholz & B. Stiftel (Eds.), Adaptive governance and water conflict: New institutions for collaborative planning (pp. 1–11). Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
Siebenhüner, B. (2008). Learning in International organizations in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 92–116.CrossRef
Simmons, B. A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.CrossRef
Swan, J., & Scarbrough, H. (2001). Knowledge management: Concepts and controversies. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 913–921.CrossRef
UNPF (2009). State of world population 2009: Facing a changing world: women, population and climate. (New York, USA ed., Vol. United Nations Population Fund). New York, USA: UNPF.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Weible, C. M., Pattison, A., & Sabatier, P. A. (2010). Harnessing expert-based information for learning and the sustainable management of complex socio-ecological systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 13, 522–534.CrossRef
Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140.CrossRef
Wood, G. A., & Parr, J. B. (2005). Transaction costs, agglomeration economies, and industrial location. Growth and Change, 36(1), 1–15.CrossRef
Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Vedlitz, A., Grover, H., & Miller, C. (2008). Vulnerability and capacity: Explaining local commitment to climate-change policy. Environment & Planning C-Government & Policy, 26(3), 544–562.CrossRef
Zhou, M. (2011). Intensification of geo-cultural homophily in global trade: Evidence from the gravity model. Social Science Research, 40, 193–209.CrossRef
- Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network
Volume 45, Issue 3 , pp 199-220
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Policy learning
- Climate change
- Transnational network
- Multi-stakeholder governing body
- Social network analysis
- Exponential random graph model
- Industry Sectors