Acharya, T. (2007). Science and technology for wealth and health in developing countries. Global Public Health,
Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review,
Altieri, M., & Rosset, P. (1999). Ten reasons why biotechnology will not ensure food security, protect the environment and reduce poverty in the developing world. AgBioForum,
American Cancer Society. (2008). Breast cancer facts and figures, 2007–2008. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
Arrow, K. J. (1971). A utilitarian approach to the concept of equality in public expenditures. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1985). Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review,
Branscomb, L. M. (1992). Does America need a technology policy? Harvard Business Review, March–April, 24–31.
Caswill, C., & Shove, E. (2000). Introducing interactive social science. Science and Public Policy,
Cook, K. S., & Hegtvedt, K. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology,
Cozzens, S. E. (2007). Distributive justice in science and technology policy. Science and Public Policy,
Cross, J. (2009). Finland makes broadband a legal right. PC World, October 14. http://www.pcworld.com/article/173691/.html
. Accessed October 25, 2009.
Ellul, J. (1967). The technological society. New York, NY: Random House.
Ellul, J. (1992). Technology and democracy. In L. Winner (Ed.), Democracy in a technological society. Netherlands: Kluwer.
Epstein, S. (2000). Democracy, expertise, and AIDS treatment activism: science technology and democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Farmer, P. (1999). Infections and inequalities: the modern plagues. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Fielder, J. (1992). Autonomous technology, democracy, and the Nimbys. In L. Winner (Ed.), Democracy in a technological society. Netherlands: Kluwer.
Giordano, S., Buzdar, A., & Hortobagyi, G. (2002). Breast cancer in men. Annals of Internal Medicine,
Goldenberg, J. (1998). What is the role of science in developing countries? Science, 279(5354), 1140.
Goldin, K. (1977). Equal access vs. selective access: A critique of public goods theory. Public Choice,
Goldstein, J. S. (1985). Basic human needs: The plateau curve. World Development,
Harding, S. (2006). Science and social inequality: Feminist and post-colonial issues. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Harsch, E. (2004). Agriculture: Africa’s engine for growth. Africa Recovery,
Henwood, F., Miller, N., Senker, P., & Wyatt, S. (2001). Technology and in/equality: Questioning the information society. New York: Routledge Press.
Jordan, C. (2002). Genetic engineering, the farm crisis, and world hunger. BioScience, 52(6), 523–529.
Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reinventing the democratic governance project through information technology? A growing agenda for debate. Public Administration Review,
Kellog, W., & Mathur, A. (2003). Environmental justice and information technologies: overcoming the information-access paradox in urban communities. Public Administration Review,
Kimbrell, A. (1998). Why biotechnology and high-tech agriculture cannot feed the world. The Ecologist, 28(5), September/October.
Kleinman, D. (2000). Science, technology, and democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature,
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Harper.
Levitt, N., & Gross, P. (1994). The perils of democratizing science. The Chronicle of Higher Education,
Lievrouw, L. A., & Farb, S. E. (2003). Information and equity. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,
Lucas, J. R. (1965). Against equality. Philosophy,
Meeker, B. F., & Elliot, G. C. (1987). Counting the costs: Equity and the allocation of negative group products. Social Psychology Quarterly,
Mookherjee, D., & Ray, D. (2003). Persistent inequality. Review of Economic Studies,
Moon, B. E., & Dixon, W. J. (1985). Politics, the state, and basic human needs: A cross-national study. American Journal of Political Science,
Morris, M. D. (1979). Measuring the conditions of the world’s poor. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Mueller, D. C. (1976). Public choice: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature,
National Council on Disability. (2001). The accessible future. Washington, DC. June 21.
Nelson, R. (1981). Research on productivity growth and productivity differences: Dead ends and new departures. Journal of Economic Literature,
Nelson, R. (2003). On the uneven evolution of human know-how. Research Policy,
O’Brien, J. (2009). Has Apple produced too much of a good thing with its IPhone? Brisbane Courier/Mail. October 20. http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26237576-8362,00.html
. Accessed October 25, 2009.
Pazner, E. A., & Schmeidler, D. (1978). Egalitarian equivalent allocations: A new concept of economic equity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Persley, G. J., & Lantin, M. M. (1999). Agricultural biotechnology and the poor. DC: Washington.
Plough, A., & Krimsky, S. (1990). The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context. In T. Glickman & M. Gough (Eds.), Readings in risk. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Portner, P. (2001). Economics of devices. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 71(3S), 199–204.
Poynter, G., & De Miranda, A. (2000). Inequality, work, and technology in the services sector. New York: Routledge Press.
Radošević, S. (1999). International technology transfer and catch-up in economic development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Raphael, D. D. (1946). Equality and equity. Philosophy,
Rauch, J. (2003). Will Frankenfood save the planet? Atlantic Monthly, October.
Reader, S. (2006). Does a basic needs approach need capabilities? Journal of Philosophy,
Rousseau, J. J. (1755). Discourse on the origin and foundations of inequality among men Translated in 1992 by Donald Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Ruttan, V. (2001). Technology, growth and development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sarewitz, D. (1993). The mother of necessity: Technology policy and social equity. Science and Public Policy,
Schensul, J. (2002). Democratizing science through social science research partnerships. Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society,
Schiller, H. (1996). Information inequality: The deepening social crisis in America. London, UK: Routledge Press.
Sclove, R. (1992). The nuts and bolts of democracy. In L. Winner (Ed.), Democracy in a Technological Society. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Scott, J. T., Matland, R., Michelbach, P., & Bornstein, B. (2001). Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms. American Journal of Political Science,
Sen, A. (1973). Poverty, inequality, and unemployment: Some conceptual issues in measurement. Economic and Political Weekly,
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Senker, P. (2003). Biotech and inequality. London: Department of Innovation Studies.
Shiva, V. (1993). Monocultures of the mind: Perspectives on biodiversity and biotechnology. London: Zed Books.
Shiva, V. (1999). Stolen harvest: The hijacking of the global food supply. Boston: South End Press.
Singer, P. A., & Daar, A. S. (2001). Harnessing genomics and biotechnology to improve global health equity. Science,
Smith, B. (1990). American science policy since World War II. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Solomon, G., Allen, N., & Resta, P. (2002). Toward digital equity: Bridging the divide in education. The United Kingdom: Allyn and Bacon.
Stepan, N. (1978). The interplay between socio-economic factors and medical science: Yellow fever research, Cuba and the United States. Social Studies of Science,
Tesh, S. (1998). Hidden arguments: Political ideology and disease prevention policy. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Tesh, S. (2000). Uncertain hazards. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Thomas, G., & Wyatt, S. (2000). Access is not the only problem: Using and controlling the internet. New York: Routledge Press.
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
United Nations. (2005). Emerging issues in science and technology for Africa’s development. New York: Economic Commission for Africa, Sustainable Development Division.
United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Health People 2010. See http://www.healthypeople.gov/Publications/Cornerstone.pdf
. Accessed 3-01-10.
Varian, H. (1975). Distributive justice, welfare economics, and the theory of fairness. Philosophy & Public Affairs,
Wachelder, J. (2003). Democratizing science: various routes and visions of Dutch science shops. Science, Technology and Human Values,
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wartofsky, M. (1992). Technology, power, and truth: Political and epistemological reflections on the fourth revolution. In L. Winner (Ed.), Democracy in a technological society. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Watson, R., Crawford, M., & Farley, S. (2003) Strategic approaches to science and technology in development. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3026, April 2003.
Winner, L. (1992). Democracy in a technological society. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Woodhouse, E., & Sarewit, D. (2007). Science policies for reducing societal inequities. Science and Public Policy, 34(2.1), 139–150.
Wresch, W. (1996). Disconnected: Haves and have-nots in the information age. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Wyatt, S., Henwood, F., et al. (2000). Technology and in/equality. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
Zaal, R., & Leydesdorff, L. (1987). Amsterdam science shop and its influence on university research: The effects of ten years of dealing with non-academic questions. Science and Public Policy,