Skip to main content
Log in

Indirect carbon emissions from household consumption between China and the USA: based on an input–output model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on an input–output model, this paper calculates carbon emissions from household energy consumption in 2002, 2005, 2007, and 2010 between China and the USA. By a comparative analysis of the two countries, the results indicate the following: (1) In terms of the total household indirect carbon emissions, the USA has always been at a higher level than China. However, in recent years, China has presented a rapidly rising trend. In contrast, the USA appears to be experiencing a downward trend. (2) Indirect carbon emissions from USA household consumption mainly focus on Residence; Education, Culture, and Recreation; and Transport and Communications. By comparison, residence accounts for 50 % of China’s household indirect carbon emissions, and seven other sectors are much less than the USA (3) Although the number of China’s household facilities is growing rapidly, the carbon emissions remain at a relatively steady level. (4) In terms of the absolute value of the indirect carbon emissions from housing, the USA maintains a steady 400 million ton, while China increased from 150 to 500 million ton over 2002–2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Druckman A, Jackson T (2009) The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: a social-economically disaggregated quasi-multi-regional input–output model. Ecol Econ 68:2066–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, Stern PC, Vandenbergh MP (2009) Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(44):18452–18456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong HJ, Geng Y (2012) Study on carbon footprint of the household consumption in Beijing based on input–output analysis. Resour Sci 34(3):494–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng ZH, Zou LL, Wei YM (2010) Study on the relationship between household living and CO2 emissions in China. Energy China 32(3):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng L, Lin T, Zhao QJ (2011a) Analysis of the dynamic characteristics of urban household energy use and carbon emissions in China. China Popul Resourc Environ 21(5):93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng ZH, Zou LL, Wei YM (2011b) The impact of household consumption on energy use and CO2 emissions in China. Energy 36(1):656–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamamoto M (2013) Energy-saving behavior and marginal abatement cost for household CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 63:809–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen J, Junnila S (2011) Implications of urban structure on carbon consumption in metropolitan areas. Environ Res Lett 6(1):14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C, Kammen DM (2014) Spatial distribution of US household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environ Sci Technol 48(2):895–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok R, Benders RMJ, Moll HC (2006) Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input-output energy analysis: a comparison of methods and a discussion of results. Energy Policy 34(17):2744–2761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M (1998) Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 26(6):495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief WW (1936) Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. Rev Econ Stat 18(3):105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XC, Sweeney J (2012) Modeling the impact of urban form on household energy demand and related CO2 emissions in the greater Dublin region. Energy Policy 46:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JR, Peters GP, Wang RS, Yang JX (2007) Hybrid life cycle analysis and its applications in sustainable consumption researches. Acta Ecol Sin 27(12):5332–5336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LC, Wu G, Wang JN, Wei YM (2011) China’s carbon emissions from urban and rural households during 1992–2007. J Clean Prod 19(15):1754–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munksgaard J, Pedersen KA, Wien M (2000) Impact of household consumption on CO2 emissions. Energy Econ 22(4):423–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri S, Spreng D (2002) Direct and indirect energy requirements of household in India. Energy Policy 30(6):511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papathanasopoulou E (2010) Household consumption associated fossil fuel demand and carbon dioxide emissions: the case of Greece between 1990 and 2006. Energy Policy 38(8):4152–4162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Shi MJ (2009) CO2 emission induced by urban household consumption in China. Chin J Popul Resour Environ 7(3):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH, Liu W, Yin JH (2015) Driving forces of indirect carbon emissions from household consumption in China: an input–output decomposition analysis. Nat Hazards 75:S257–S272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C, Perrels A (2000) Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions. Energy Policy 28(8):549–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei YM, Liu LC, Fan Y, Wu G (2007) The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2 emission: an empirical analysis of China's residents. Energy Policy 35(1):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LX, Wang CB, Song B (2013) Carbon emission reduction potential of a typical household biogas system in rural China. J Clean Prod 47:415–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XL, Luo LZ, Skitmore M (2015) Household carbon emission research: an analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects. J  Clean Prod 103:873–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Reference Nos. 71573015, 71303019 and 71521002). The authors would like to express their gratitude to Prof. Yiming Wei for his comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Wei Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, XW., Du, J., Zhang, MY. et al. Indirect carbon emissions from household consumption between China and the USA: based on an input–output model. Nat Hazards 84 (Suppl 1), 399–410 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2508-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2508-5

Keywords

Navigation