Abstract
Social media data are increasingly being used in disaster management for information dissemination, establishment of situational awareness of the “big picture” of the disaster impact and emerged incidences over time, and public peer-to-peer backchannel communications. Before we can fully trust the situational awareness established from social media data, we need to ask whether there are biases in data generation: Can we simply associate more tweets with more severe disaster impacts and therefore higher needs for relief and assistance in that area? If we rely on social media for real-time information dissemination, who can we reach and who has been left out? Due to the uneven access to social media and heterogeneous motivations in social media usage, situational awareness based on social media data may not reveal the true picture. In this study, we examine the spatial heterogeneity in the generation of tweets after a major disaster. We developed a novel model to explain the number of tweets by mass, material, access, and motivation (MMAM). Empirical analysis of tweets about Hurricane Sandy in New York City largely confirmed the MMAM model. We also found that community socioeconomic factors are more important than population size and damage levels in predicting disaster-related tweets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The ACS dataset marked median housing values lower than $10,000 as “<$10,000” and higher than 1 billion as “>$1 million.” Because no exact value was reported, we used $10,000 or $1 million as the median housing value for those census tracts.
References
Ames M, Naaman M (2007) Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA
Austin L, Liu BF, Jin Y (2012) How audiences seek out crisis information: exploring the social-mediated crisis communication model. J Appl Commun Res 40(2):188–207
Bennett S (2011) Twitter users better educated than Facebook users, but both dumb compared to LinkedIn. http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/pew-social-network-education/453137. Retrieved 24 May 2015
Blake ES, Kimberlain TB, Berg RJ, Cangialosi JP, Beven II JL (2013) Tropical cyclone report-Hurricane Sandy (AL182012), National Hurricane Center. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL182012_Sandy.pdf. Retrieved 20 Oct 2014
Cameron MA, Power R, Robinson B, Yin J (2012) Emergency Situation awareness from twitter for crisis management. WWW 2012—SWDM’12 Workshop, Lyon, France
De Longueville B, Annoni A, Schade S, Ostlaender N, Whitmore C (2010a) Digital earth’s nervous system for crisis events: real-time sensor web enablement of volunteered geographic information. Int J Digit Earth 3(3):242–259
De Longueville B, Luraschi G, Smits P, Peedell S, De Groeve T (2010b) Citizens as sensors for nautural hazards: a VGI integration workflow. Geomatica 64(1):41–59
Dutta-Bergman MJ (2004) Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and new media. J Broadcast Electron Media 48(1):41–60
Dutta-Bergman MJ (2006) Community participation and internet use after September 11: complementarity in channel consumption. J Comput Med Commun 11(2):469–484
FEMA (2014). Hurricane Sandy impact analysis, FEMA modeling task force (MOTF). http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=307dd522499d4a44a33d7296a5da5ea0. Retrieved 15 Feb 2014
Gao H, Barbier G, Goolsby R (2011) Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE Intell Syst 26(3):10–14
Gibbs LI, Holloway CF (2013) Hurricane Sandy after action: report and recommendations to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. http://www.nyc.gov/html/recovery/downloads/pdf/sandy_aar_5.2.13.pdf. Retrieved 1 Dec 2014
Goodchild MF, Glennon JA (2010) Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. Int J Digit Earth 3(3):231–241
Goodchild MF, Li L (2012) Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spat Stat 1:110–120
Henry DK, Cooke-Hull S, Savukinas J, Yu F, Elo N, Arnum BV (2013) Economic impact of Hurricane Sandy: potential economic activity lost and gained in New Jersey and New York U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/reports/documents/sandyfinal101713.pdf. Retrieved 1 Dec 2014
Houston JB, Hawthorne J, Perreault MF, Park EH, Hode MG, Halliwell MR, McGowen SET, Davis R, Vaid S, McElderry JA, Griffith SA (2014) Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters. doi:10.1111/disa.12092
Huang Q, Xiao Y (2015) Geographic situational awareness: mining tweets for disaster preparedness, emergency response, impact, and recovery. Int J Geo-Inf 4(3):1549–1568. doi:10.3390/ijgi4031549
Imran M, Elbassuoni S, Castillo C, Diaz F, Meier P (2013) Extracting information nuggets from disaster-related messages in social media. 10th international ISCRAM conference, Baden-Baden, Germany
Kalba K (2008) The global adoption and diffusion of mobile phones. Havard University, Cambridge
Keim ME, Noji E (2011) Emergent use of social media: a new age of opportunity for disaster resilience. Am J Disaster Med 6(1):47–54
Kumar S, Barbier G, Abbasi MA, Liu H (2011) TweetTracker: an analysis tool for humanitarian and disaster relief, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. www.aaai.org
Li L, Goodchild MF, Xu B (2013) Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 40(2):61–77
Lindsay BR (2011) Social media and disasters: current uses, future options, and policy considerations, congressional research service, report number: R41987
Liu SB, Palen L, Sutton J, Hughes AL, Vieweg S (2008) In search of the bigger picture: the emergent role of on-line photo sharing in times of disaster. 5th international ISCRAM conference, Washington, DC
Mendoza M, Poblete B, Castillo C (2010) Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? 1st workshop on social media analytics (SOMA’10), Washington, DC
Palen L (2008) Online social media in crisis events. Educ Q 31(3):76–78
Schnebele E, Cervone G (2013) Improving remote sensing flood assessment using volunteered geographical data. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:669–677
Skelton A (2012) Social demographics: who’s using today’s biggest networks. http://mashable.com/2012/03/09/social-media-demographics/. Retrieved 24 May 2015
Sutton J, Palen L, Shklovski I (2008) Backchannels on the front lines: emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. 5th international ISCRAM conference, Washington, DC
The Dallas Morning News (2013) Texas A&M issues ‘code maroon’ alert, evacuates buildings due to Kyle Field bomb threat. http://www.dallasnews.com/news/state/headlines/20130220-texas-am-issues-code-maroon-alert-evacuates-buildings-due-to-kyle-field-bomb-threat.ece. Retrieved 1 Mar 2015
van Dijk JAGM (2006) Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics 34:221–235
Vieweg S, Hughes AL, Starbird K, Palen L (2010) Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. CHI 2010: Crisis Informatics, Atlanta, GA
Villarreal S, Sigman A (2010) Explosion at Texas A&M Chemistry Annex Building. http://www.kbtx.com/home/headlines/93421299.html. Retrieved 1 Mar 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, Y., Huang, Q. & Wu, K. Understanding social media data for disaster management. Nat Hazards 79, 1663–1679 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1918-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1918-0