Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling infrastructure system interdependencies and socioeconomic impacts of failure in extreme events: emerging R&D challenges

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Greater urbanization does not only mean higher concentrations of population and economic activities, but also increasing complexity and infrastructure interdependencies in the delivery of critical urban services such as energy, water, transport and communication. This paper reviews the current literature in these areas and identifies critical research and development challenges from the perspective—and for the benefit—of key stakeholders, considering their primary decision goals and context. From this vantage point, the critical evaluation framework is extended to include a classification of disruptions and extreme events and an overview of infrastructure modeling approaches and broader socioeconomic impacts assessment methods. Mapping the range of modeling and assessment methods against different decision contexts, critical gaps in knowledge and tools are identified to support the latter. Deep uncertainties characterize the challenge as each major component in the information and decision-making chain—from the frequency and intensity of a disruptive event, to assessing the first-order and immediate impacts of an infrastructure failure, to estimating the nature, extent and impact of cascading failures—multiplies the uncertainties. The emerging research challenges to deal with these interdependencies and uncertainties are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E (2002) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Netw 38(4):393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesch DJ, Taylor C, Ghanty AS, Nagy RA (1993) Earthquake risk reduction and small business. In: 1993 national earthquake conference monograph 5: socioeconomic impacts, vol 5, pp 133–160

  • Aven T (2012) The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T (2013a) On how to deal with deep uncertainties in a risk assessment and management context. Risk Anal 33(12):2082–2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T (2013b) On the meaning of a black swan in a risk context. Saf Sci 57:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakens W, Foliente G, Jasuja M (2005) Engaging stakeholders in performance-based building: lessons from the performance-based building (PeBBu) network. Build Res Inf 33(2):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balouktsi M, Luetzkendorf T, Foliente G (2015) Making a difference: incorporating embodied impacts into the decision-making processes of key actors in the construction and property industry. In: The SETAC 25th annual meeting. Barcelona, Spain

  • Barrett C, Beckman R, Channakeshava K, Huang F, Kumar VSA, Marathe A (2010) Cascading failures in multiple infrastructures: from transportation to communication network. In: Proceedings of the fifth international CRIS conference on critical infrastructures. Beijing

  • Barton DC, Eidson ED, Schoenwald DA, Stamber KL, Reinert RK (2000) Aspen-EE: an agent-based model of infrastructure interdependency. In: Sandia Report, SAND2000-2925

  • Barton DC, Edison EC, Schoenwald DA, Cox RG, Reinert RK (2004) Simulating economic effects of disruptions in the telecommunications infrastructure. In: Sandia Report, SAND2004-0101

  • Becker T, Nagel C, Kolbe TH (2011) Integrated 3D modeling of multi-utility networks and their interdependencies for critical infrastructure analysis. Advances in 3D geo-information sciences. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography, pp 1–20

  • Bloomfield R, Chozos N, Nobles P (2009) Infrastructure interdependency analysis: introductory research review. Adelard document reference: D/422/12101/4

  • Boisvert R (1992) Direct and indirect economic losses from lifeline damage. In: Indirect economics consequences of a catastrophic earthquake, Final report by development technologies to the Federal Emergency Management Agency

  • Brookshire D, McKee M (1992) Other indirect costs and losses from earthquakes: issues and estimation. In: Indirect consequences of a catastrophic earthquake, Final report by development technologies to the Federal Emergency Management Agency

  • Brookshire DS, Chang SE, Cochrane H, Olson RA, Rose A, Steenson J (1997) Direct and indirect economic losses from earthquake damage. Earthq Spectra 13(4):683–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown T, Beyeler W, Barton D (2004) Assessing infrastructure interdependencies: the challenge of risk analysis for complex adaptive systems. Int J Crit Infrastruct 1(1):108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S (2010) Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464(7291):1025–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush B, Dauelsberg L, Leclaire R, Powell D, Deland S, Samsa M (2005) Critical infrastructure protection decision support system (CIP/DSS) overview. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-05-1870, Los Alamos, NM 87544

  • Cagno E, De Ambroggi M, Grande O, Trucco P (2011) Risk analysis of underground infrastructures in urban areas. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(1):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SE (2003) Evaluating disaster mitigations: methodology for urban infrastructure systems. Nat Hazards Rev 4(4):186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SE, McDaniels TL, Mikawoz J, Peterson K (2007) Infrastructure failure interdependencies in extreme events: power outage consequences in the 1998 Ice Storm. Nat Hazards 41(2):337–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SE, McDaniels T, Fox J, Dhariwal R, Longstaff H (2014) Toward disaster-resilient cities: characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments. Risk Anal 34(3):416–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther KG, Haimes YY (2010) Development of the multiregional inoperability input–output model (MRIIM) for spatial explicitness in preparedness of interdependent regions. Syst Eng 13(1):28–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang SE, Pasion C, Yavari S, Elwood K (2009) Social impacts of lifeline losses: modeling displaced populations and health care functionality, ASCE conference proceedings, vol 357

  • Comes T, Van de Walle B (2014) Measuring disaster resilience: the impact of hurricane sandy on critical infrastructure systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th international ISCRAM conference

  • Dacy DC, Kunreuther H (1969) The economics of natural disasters: implications for federal policy. The Free Press, New York, NY

  • Dahlhamer JM, D’Souza MJ (1997) Determinants of Business-Disaster Preparedness in Two U.S. Metropolitan Areas. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 15(2):265–281

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijne M, van Eeten M (2007) Systems that should have failed: critical infrastructure protection in an institutionally fragmented environment. J Conting Crisis Manag 15(1):18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dore M, Etkin D (2000) The importance of measuring the social costs of natural disasters at a time of climate change. Aust J Emerg Manag 15(3):46

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudenhoeffer DD, Permann MR, Manic M (2006) CIMS: a framework for infrastructure interdependency modeling and analysis. In: Proceedings—winter simulation conference, pp 478–485

  • Dueñas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (2007) Seismic response of critical interdependent networks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(2):285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkin ME (1984) The economic recovery of small businesses after earthquakes: the Coalinga experience. In: International conference on natural hazards mitigation research and practice

  • Eusgeld I, Henzi D, Kröger W (2008) Comparative evaluation of modeling and simulation techniques for interdependent critical infrastructures. ETH Zurich, Scientific report 50

  • Ezell BC, Farr JV, Wiese I (2000a) Infrastructure risk analysis model. J Infrastruct Syst 6(3):114–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell BC, Farr JV, Wiese I (2000b) Infrastructure risk analysis of municipal water distribution system. J Infrastruct Syst 6(3):118–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CB (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Field CB, Barros V, Dokken DJ (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Volume I: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York

  • Foliente G (2002) Whole-of-life asset management—practices, challenges and opportunities. CSIRO Report Highett, Vic, Australia

  • Forrester JW (1961). Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Franchina L, Carbonelli M, Gratta L, Crisci M, Perucchini D (2011) An impact-based approach for the analysis of cascading effects in critical infrastructures. Int J Crit Infrastruct 7(1):73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P, Richardson HW (1995) The business interruption effects of the Northridge earthquake. Lusk Center Research Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

  • Griot C (2010) Modelling and simulation for critical infrastructure interdependency assessment: a meta-review for model characterisation. Int J Crit Infrastruct 6(4):363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois F, Below R (2013) Annual disaster statistical review 2012: the numbers and trends.Brussels, Belgium

  • Guikema SD (2009) Natural disaster risk analysis for critical infrastructure systems: an approach based on statistical learning theory. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(4):855–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes YY, Jiang P (2001) Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures. J Infrastruct Syst 7(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2008) An adaptive regional input–output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of Katrina. Risk Anal 28(3):779–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden R, Val DV, Burkhard R, Nodwell S (2013) A network flow model for interdependent infrastructures at the local scale. Saf Sci 53:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CN, Liou JJH, Chuang YC (2014) A method for exploring the interdependencies and importance of critical infrastructures. Knowl Based Syst 55:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung J, Santos JR, Haimes YY (2009) International trade inoperability input–output model (IT-IIM): Theory and application. Risk Anal 29(1):137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junger S (2009) The perfect storm: a true story of men against the sea. WW Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim TJ, Ham H, Boyce DE (2002) Economic impacts of transportation network changes: implementation of a combined transportation network and input–output model. Pap Reg Sci 81(2):223–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kircher CA, Whitman RV, Holmes WT (2006) HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjølle GH, Utne IB, Gjerde O (2012) Risk analysis of critical infrastructures emphasizing electricity supply and interdependencies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 105:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröger W (2008) Critical infrastructures at risk: a need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(12):1781–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll CA, Landis JD, Shen Q, Stryker S (1991) Economic impacts of the Loma Prieta earthquake: a focus on small business. Working Paper No. 91-187

  • Leontief WW (1951) Input–output economics. Sci Am 185(4):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung M, Haimes YY, Santos JR (2007) Supply- and output-side extensions to the inoperability input–output model for interdependent infrastructures. J Infrastruct Syst 13(4):299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian C, Haimes YY (2006) Managing the risk of terrorism to interdependent infrastructure systems through the dynamic inoperability input–output model. Syst Eng 9(3):241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (1998) Earthquake impacts and hazard adjustment by acutely hazardous materials facilities following the Northridge earthquake. Earthq Spectra 14(2):285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Prater CS (2003) Assessing community impacts of natural disasters. Nat Hazards Rev 4(4):176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little RG (2002) Controlling cascading failure: understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. J Urban Technol 9(1):109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels T, Chang S, Peterson K, Mikawoz J, Reed DM (2007) Empirical framework for characterizing infrastructure failure interdependencies. J Infrastruct Syst 13(3):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg JM (1995) Disaster recovery as a social process. Wellington after the quake: the challenge of rebuilding, pp 81–92

  • North MJ (2001a) Multi-agent social and organizational modeling of electric power and natural gas markets. Comput Math Organ Theory 7(4):331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North MJ (2001b) Smart II: the spot market agent research tool version 2.0. Nat Resour Environ Issues 8(1):69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang M (2014) Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paté-Cornell E (2012) On “black swans” and “perfect storms”: risk analysis and management when statistics are not enough. Risk Anal 32(11):1823–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCCIP (1997) Critical foundations: protecting America’s infrastructures: the report of the President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection. Rep. No. 040-000-00699-1, President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection

  • Pederson P, Dudenhoeffer D, Hartley S, Permann M (2006) Critical infrastructure interdependency modeling: a survey of US and international research. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho

  • Quinn MCL, Taylor O-DS (2014) Hazard topography: visual approach for identifying critical failure combinations for infrastructure. Nat Hazards Rev 15(4):04014012

  • Rahman HA, Armstrong M, Mao D, Marti JR (2008) I2Sim: a matrix-partition based framework for critical infrastructure interdependencies simulation. Electric power conference, 2008. EPEC 2008. IEEE Canada, pp 1–8, 6–7 Oct 2008

  • Rahman HA, Armstrong M, Marti JR, Srivastava KD (2011) Infrastructure interdependencies simulation through matrix partitioning technique. Int J Crit Infrastruct 7(2):91–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resurreccion J, Santos J (2013) Uncertainty modeling of hurricane-based disruptions to interdependent economic and infrastructure systems. Nat Hazards 69(3):1497–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revi A, Satterthwaite D, Aragón-Durand F, Corfee-Morlot J, Kiunsi RBR, Pelling M, Roberts D, Solecki W, Gajjar SP, Sverdlik A (2014) Towards transformative adaptation in cities: the IPCC’s fifth assessment. Environ Urban 26(1):11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi SM (2004) Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-37), Big Island, Hawaii, pp 54–61

  • Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK (2001) Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Syst Mag 21(6):11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert B (2004) A method for the study of cascading effects within lifeline networks. Int J Crit Infrastruct 1(1):86–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A (2004) Economic principles, issues, and research priorities in hazard loss estimation. Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters, Springer, Berlin, pp 13–36

  • Rose A, Liao SY (2005) Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: a computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. J Reg Sci 45(1):75–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A, Oladosu G, Liao S (2005) Regional economic impacts of terrorist attacks on the electric power system of Los Angeles: a computable general disequilibrium analysis. In: Second annual symposium of the DHS center for risk and economic analysis of terrorism events, USC, Los Angeles, CA

  • Rübbelke D, Vögele S (2011) Impacts of climate change on European critical infrastructures: the case of the power sector. Environ Sci Policy 14(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santella N, Steinberg LJ, Parks K (2009) Decision making for extreme events: modeling critical infrastructure interdependencies to aid mitigation and response planning. Rev Policy Res 26(4):409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos JR (2006) Inoperability input–output modeling of disruptions to interdependent economic systems. Syst Eng 9(1):20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos JR, Haimes YY (2004) Modeling the demand reduction input–output (I–O) inoperability due to terrorism of interconnected infrastructures. Risk Anal 24(6):1437–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satumtira G, Dueñas-Osorio L (2010) Synthesis of modeling and simulation methods on critical infrastructure interdependencies research. In: Gopalakrishnan, Peeta S (eds) Sustainable and resilient critical infrastructure systems, Springer, Berlin, pp 1–51

  • Scawthorn C, Flores P, Blais N, Seligson H, Tate E, Chang S, Mifflin E, Thomas W, Murphy J, Jones C (2006) HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PJ, Schauer BA (2006) HAZUS—its development and its future. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg LJ, Santella N, Zoli CB (2011) Baton Rouge post-Katrina: the role of critical infrastructure modeling in promoting resilience. Homeland Security Affairs 7: Article 7

  • Sterman JD (2001) System dynamics modeling: tools for learning in a complex world. Calif Manag Rev 43(4):8–25

  • Sundermann L, Schelske O, Hausmann P (2013) Mind the risk—a global ranking of cities under threat from natural disasters. Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd., Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen NK, Wolthusen SD (2007) Connectivity models of interdependency in mixed-type critical infrastructure networks. Inf Secur Tech Rep 12(1):44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2009) Errors, robustness, and the fourth quadrant. Int J Forecast 25(4):744–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2010) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable Fragility. Random House LLC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2014) Silent risk: lectures on fat tails,(anti) fragility, and asymmetric exposures. Available at SSRN 2392310

  • Taleb NN, Douady R (2013) Mathematical definition, mapping, and detection of (anti) fragility. Quant Finance 13(11):1677–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney K (1997) Business impacts of the Northridge earthquake. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 5(2):87–97

  • Tonmoy FN, El-Zein A (2013) Vulnerability of infrastructure to sea level rise: a combined outranking and system-dynamics approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 2407–2414

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne IB, Hokstad P, Vatn J (2011) A method for risk modeling of interdependencies in critical infrastructures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(6):671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PJ, Skerlj PF, Lin J, Twisdale LA Jr, Young MA, Lavelle FM (2006) HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: damage and loss estimation. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Hong L, Chen X (2012) Vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems: a methodological framework. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 391(11):3323–3335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts D (2003) Security & vulnerability in electric power system. In: 35th North American power symposium (NAPS 2003), pp 559–566

  • Wilbanks T, Fernandez S, Backus G, Garcia P, Jonietz K, Kirshen P, Savonis M, Solecki W, Toole L (2013) Climate change and infrastructure, urban systems, and vulnerabilities. Technical Report for the US Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment

  • Yen-Kuang C (2012) Challenges and opportunities of internet of things. In: Proceedings design automation conference (ASP-DAC), 2012 17th Asia and South Pacific, pp 383–388

  • Yusta JM, Correa GJ, Lacal-Arántegui R (2011) Methodologies and applications for critical infrastructure protection: state-of-the-art. Energy Policy 39(10):6100–6119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Peeta S (2011) A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems. Transp Res Part B Methodol 45(3):553–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman R, Restrepo CE (2006) The next step: quantifying infrastructure interdependencies to improve security. Int J Crit Infrastruct 2(2–3):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Chi-Hsiang Wang of CSIRO and the two anonymous referees who provided useful comments on an earlier draft of the paper. Particularly, the comments of one of the reviewers improved the paper significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO Land and Water Flagship, PO Box 56, Highett, VIC, 3190, Australia

    Samiul Hasan & Greg Foliente

  2. Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Greg Foliente

Authors
  1. Samiul Hasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Greg Foliente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samiul Hasan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasan, S., Foliente, G. Modeling infrastructure system interdependencies and socioeconomic impacts of failure in extreme events: emerging R&D challenges. Nat Hazards 78, 2143–2168 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1814-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1814-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation