Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk assessment of maize drought hazard in the middle region of farming-pastoral ecotone in Northern China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global warming has drawn great attention in recent years, and the resultant extreme drought events have seriously influenced food security. Drought hazard has become a major stress factor for food production in China. The present study aimed to assess the drought hazard risk of maize in middle region of farming-pastoral ecotone of Northern China using spatial maize drought hazard intensity index. The drought hazard intensity index model was set up based on the output variable water stress of environmental policy-integrated climate model and yield loss contribution rate α of water stress in each growth stage. The yield loss contribution rate α is calculated based on the relationship between the water deficit in different stages and the yield loss. Added with the spatial data in time series, results are used for risk assessment. It shows that the tendency of maize drought hazard intensity index was increasing from 1966 to 2011 and was becoming significant after 1996. The volatility is becoming stronger, especially in central basin and northwestern plateau of the study area. The extreme drought events were more frequent. The degree of maize drought was aggravated, and scope of influence was extended after 1999. And the risk of drought hazard is relatively high in the study area, especially in the central basin. In conclusion, this paper presents an effective way to analyze maize drought hazard risk. For the middle region of farming-pastoral ecotone in Northern China, the seriously increasing maize drought hazard is demonstrated by the temporal and spatial analyses and the probability distribution of maize drought hazard intensity index, which presents its sensitivity to climate change and its representativeness to the study of agricultural drought hazard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Meteorological Society (2004) Statement on meteorological drought. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:771–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Angstrom A (1924) Solar and terrestrial radiation. Report to the international commission for solar research on actinometric investigations of solar and atmospheric radiation. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 50:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AQSIQ/SAC (2008) GB/T 21986–2008 Assessment of agroclimate impact: classification method of annual crop climate types. Beijing, general administration of quality supervision, inspection and quarantine of the People’s Republic of China/standardization administration of the peoples Republic of China. In Chinese

  • Byun H-R, Wilhite DA (1999) Objective quantification of drought severity and duration. J Clim 12:2747–2756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD, WFP (2013) The State of Food Insecurity in the World. The multiple dimensions of food security. Rome, FAO

  • Fischer G, Tubiello FN, Van Velthuizen H, Wiberg DA (2007) Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements: effects of mitigation, 1990–2080. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 74:1083–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassman PW et al (2005) Historical development and applications of the EPIC and APEX models. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Secretariat General (1994) Convention to combat drought and desertification in countries experiencing serious droughts and/or desertification, particularly in Africa. Paris

  • Guo Q, Wang Q, Wang L (2004) Chinese maize cultivation Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers (In Chinese)

  • Hao L, Zhang X, Liu S (2012) Risk assessment to China’s agricultural drought disaster in county unit. Nat Hazards 61:785–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger S, Isard S, Welford M (1993) A new soil moisture drought index for predicting crop yields. In: Preprints, Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, pp 187–190

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Cambridge Univ Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju H, van der Velde M, Lin E, Xiong W, Li Y (2013) The impacts of climate change on agricultural production systems in China. Clim Chang 120:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamel M (2003) Ecotone classification according to its origin. Pak J Biol Sci 6:1553–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyantash JA, Dracup JA (2004) An aggregate drought index: assessing drought severity based on fluctuations in the hydrologic cycle and surface water storage. Water Resour Res 40:W09304

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Ye W, Wang M, Yan X (2009) Climate change and drought: a risk assessment of crop-yield impacts. Clim Res 39:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Kogan F (1996) Monitoring regional drought using the vegetation condition index. Int J Remote Sens 17:2761–2782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J-H, Gao J-X, Lv S-H, Han Y-W, Nie Y-H (2011) Shifting farming–pastoral ecotone in China under climate and land use changes. J Arid Environ 75:298–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Fu C (2003) Interannual characteristics of the surface hydrological variables over the arid and semi-arid areas of Northern China. Glob Planet Chang 37:189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, vol 17, pp 179–183

  • Mirabbasi R, Anagnostou EN, Fakheri-Fard A, Dinpashoh Y, Eslamian S (2013) Analysis of meteorological drought in northwest Iran using the Joint Deficit Index. J Hydrol 492:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391:202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbantis I, Tsakiris G (2009) Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resour Manag 23:881–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan B, Srinivasan R (2005) Development and evaluation of Soil Moisture Deficit Index (SMDI) and Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (ETDI) for agricultural drought monitoring. Agric For Meteorol 133:69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer S (2008) New drought indices. Proceedings of the 1st international conference “Drought management: scientific and technological innovations”, Zaragoza, Spain, pp 12–14

  • Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought. US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer WC (1968) Keeping track of crop moisture conditions, nationwide: the new crop moisture index. Weatherwise 21:156–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulo A, Pereira L (2007) Prediction of SPI drought class transitions using Markov chains. Water Resour Manag 21:1813–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popova Z, Kercheva M (2005) CERES model application for increasing preparedness to climate variability in agricultural planning—risk analyses. Phys Chem Earth Part A B C 30:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott J (1940) Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Trans Roy Soc S Aust 64:114–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee J, Im J, Carbone GJ (2010) Monitoring agricultural drought for arid and humid regions using multi-sensor remote sensing data. Remote Sens Environ 114:2875–2887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter GM, Semenov MA (2005) Modelling impacts of climate change on wheat yields in England and Wales: assessing drought risks. Agric Syst 84:77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer B, Dezman L (1982) Development of a surface water supply index (SWSI) to assess the severity of drought conditions in snowpack runoff areas. Proc West Snow Conf 50:164–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahid S, Behrawan H (2008) Drought risk assessment in the western part of Bangladesh. Nat Hazards 46:391–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma T, Panu U (2010) Analytical procedures for weekly hydrological droughts: a case of Canadian rivers. Hydrol Sci J 55:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs T, Arya L, Shouse P, Mohanty B (2001) Estimating particle-size distribution from limited soil texture data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1038–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8:127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, He F, Fang W, Liao Y (2013) Assessment of physical vulnerability to agricultural drought in China. Nat Hazards 67:645–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J, Jones C, Kiniry J, Spanel DA (1989) The EPIC crop growth model. Transactions of the ASAE (USA)

  • Woli P, Jones JW, Ingram KT, Fraisse CW (2012) Agricultural reference index for drought (ARID). Agron J 104:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zargar A, Sadiq R, Naser B, Khan FI (2011) A review of drought indices. Environ Rev 19:333–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (2004) Risk assessment of drought disaster in the maize-growing region of Songliao Plain, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102:133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Okada N, Tatano H, Hayakawa S (2002) Risk assessment and zoning of flood damage caused by heavy rainfall in Yamaguchi prefecture, Japan. In: Wu BS (ed) Flood Defence, New York, 2002. Flood Defence'2002. Science Press, pp 162–170

  • Zhao H, Zhao X, Zhang T, Zhou R (2002) Boundary line on agro-pasture zigzag zone in north china and its problems on eco-environment. Adv Earth Sci 17:739–747 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant entitle ‘‘Study on Agricultural Drought Risk Formation Mechanism of the Rain-fed Agricultural Typical Area in China’’ (41001059) from the National Science and Technology Foundation. We also thank China Meteorological Administration (CMA) for data sharing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqiang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Jiang, J., Liao, Y. et al. Risk assessment of maize drought hazard in the middle region of farming-pastoral ecotone in Northern China. Nat Hazards 76, 1515–1534 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1525-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1525-5

Keywords

Navigation