Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Resilience: a capacity and a myth: findings from an in-depth case study in disaster management research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The discussion surrounding resilience to natural hazards and disasters has advanced considerably within the last years. It ranges from ecological to social systems and also covers some socio-ecological spaces in-between. Yet, although the discussion is broad and multifaceted, a common theme runs through most approaches to resilience: Resilience is defined as a system’s capacity to adapt to or respond to singular, unique and most often radically surprising events. This paper seeks to shed some light on a different aspect of resilience; its constructionist dimension. For doing this, it introduces the ‘myth of resilience, which not only considers the functional aspects of resilience (i.e. actors capacities), but also how actors make retrospectively sense of the radically surprising discovery of something entirely unknown. The paper will argue that the ‘myth of resilience’ may become a powerful worldview that enables actors to define what is ‘right’ and what is ‘wrong’, as it may be used as a very intriguing way of changing, creating and consolidating power relations; at least this is the insight a study on disaster management reveals. The case study was conducted in a municipality of a city located in the State of Saxony Germany, which was severely affected by the 2002 August flood. The paper ends with outlining implications for the discussion on resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allenby B, Fink J (2005) Toward inherently secure and resilient societies. Science 309:1034–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger P, Luckmann T (1967) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41:283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohle H-G (2008) Leben mit Risiko—Resilience als neues Paradigma für die Risikowelten von morgen. In: Felgentreff C, Glade T (eds) Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Berlin, pp 435–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand FS, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning of resilence: resilence as a descriptive concept and a boundary concept. Ecol Soc 12(1): 23. Available via http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23/. Accessed 01 August 2010

  • Brockmeier J (1999) Erinnerung, identität und autobiographischer Prozeß. Journal für Pyschologie 7(1):11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon T, Müller-Mahn D (2010) Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change. Nat Hazards, online first

  • Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what. Ecosystems 4:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke L, Short JF Jr (1993) Social organization and risk. Some current controversies. Annu Rev Sociol 19:375–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen L (1983) Übergang zum Untergang: skizze eines makrosziologischen Prozeßmodels der Katastrophe. In: Clausen L, Dombrowksy WR (eds) Einführung in die soziologie der katastrophe. Osang Verlag, Bonn, pp 41–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn KM (2004) Resilience in flood risk management. Water Policy 6:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvberg B (2006) Five misunderstanding about case-study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological system analysis. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross M (2007) The unknown in process: dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts. Curr Sociol 55:742–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handmer JW, Dovers SR (1996) A typology of resilience: rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Ind Environ Crisis Q 9:482–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilderbrand RH, Watts AC, Randle AM (2005) The myths of restoration ecology. Ecol Soc 10(1):19. Available via http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art19/. Accessed 01 August 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1978) Myths of ecological stability: resilience and the problem of failure. In: Smart CF, Stanbury WT (eds) Studies on crisis management. Butterworth & Co. Ltd, Toronto, pp 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Clark WC (1996) Environmental surprise: expecting the unexpected. Environment 28(6–11):28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Nicholls RT, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environ Hazards 3:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlicke C (2010) The dynamics of vulnerability: some preliminary thoughts about the occurrence of ‘radical surprises’ and a case study on the 2002 flood (Germany). Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9645-z

  • Kuhlicke C, Kruse S (2009) Nichtwissen und Resilienz in der lokalen Klimaanpassung: widersprüche zwischen theoriegeleiteten handlungsempfehlungen und empirischen befunden am beispiel des Sommerhochwassers 2002. GAIA 18(3):247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss C (1963) Structural anthropology. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz B, Thieken AH (2005) Separating natural and epistemic uncertainty in flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 309:114–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz B, Hall J, Disse M, Schumann A (2010) Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:509–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1978) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83:341–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas GM (2005) Ontologie und Rationalisierung im Zurechungssystem der westlichen Kultur. In: Meyer JW (ed) Weltkulturen: wie die westlichen prinzipien die welt durchdringen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, pp M17–M46

    Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) “Stationarity is dead: whither water management?”. Science 319:573–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rerup C (2001) “Houston, we have a problem”: anticipation and improvisation as source of organizational resilience. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão 7(1):27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanze J, Hutter G, Penning-Rowsell E, Nachtnebel HP, Meyer V, Werritty A, Harries T, Holzmann H, Jessel B, Koeniger P, Kuhlicke C, Neuhold C. Olfert A, Parker D, Schildt A (2008) Systematisation, evaluation and context conditions of structural and non-structural measures for flood risk reduction. Flood-Era Joint Report, published by ERA-NET CRUE, London. Available via www.crue-eranet.net. Accesses 01 Aug 2010

  • Steinführer A, Kuhlicke C (2007). Social vulnerability and the 2002 flood: country report Germany (Mulde River). Report of Task 11 of the floodsite integrated project. Available via www.floodsite.net. Accessed 01 Sept 2009

  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1996) Grounded theory: grundlagen qualitativer sozialforschung. Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • t’Hart P (1993) Symbols, rituals and power: the lost dimensions of crisis management. J Conting Crisis Manage 1(1):36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman P (1986) Mythology and surprise in the sustainable development of the biosphere. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan D (1999) The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annu Rev Sociol 25:271–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Anderies JM, Kinzing AP, Ryan P (2006) Exploring resilience in social-ecological systems through comparative studies and theory development: Introduction to the special issue. Ecol Soc 11(1): 12. Available via http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art12/. Accessed 01 Aug 2010

  • Walker G, Whittle R, Medd W, Watson N (2010) Risk governance and natural hazards. Available via www.caphaz-net.org. Accessed 01 Aug 2010

  • Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Adm Sci Q 28:628–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildawsky A (1991) Searching for safety. Transactions, New Brunswik

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzel A (2000) Das problemzentrierte interview [26 Absätze]. Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum qualitative social research 1. Available via http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1132. Accessed 10 Oct 2009

  • Zhou H, Wang J, Wan J, Jia H (2009) Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective. Nat Hazards Online First: 11 June 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany

    Christian Kuhlicke

Authors
  1. Christian Kuhlicke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Kuhlicke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuhlicke, C. Resilience: a capacity and a myth: findings from an in-depth case study in disaster management research. Nat Hazards 67, 61–76 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9646-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9646-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation