Abstract
Briscoe et al. IEEE Spectrum, 43(7), 34–39 (2006) claim that Metcalfe’s law is “wrong”. One of their arguments is that “if Metcalfe’s Law were true, then two networks ought to interconnect regardless of their relative sizes”. This paper shows that this argument is flawed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Briscoe, B., Odlyzko, A., Tilly, B. (2006). Metcalfe’s law is wrong. IEEE Spectrum, 43(7), 34–39. http://spectrum.ieee.org/jul06/4109.
Briscoe, B., Odlyzko, A., Tilly, B. (2010). When a “law” isn’t a law at all. International Commerce Review, 8(2), 146–149.
Economides, N. (1991). Compatibility and the creation of shared networks. In: Guerin-Calvert, M., & Wildman, S. (Eds.) In Electronic services networks: A business and public policy challenge. Praeger, New York.
Esser, P., & Leruth, L. (1988). Marketing compatible, yet differentiated products: in search of competitive equilibria when network externalities are at work. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5(4), 251–270.
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1986). Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. American Economic Review, 76(5), 940–955.
Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Dynamic competition with switching costs. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(1), 123–137.
Fuentelsaz, L., Garrido, E., Maicas, J.P. (2012). A strategic approach to network value in network industries. Forthcoming in Journal of Management. Published online 31 May 2012. doi:10.1177/0149206312448399.
He, T., Kuksov, D., Narasimhan, C. (2012). Intraconnectivity and interconnectivity: when value creation may reduce profits. Marketing Science, 31(4), 587–602. doi:10.1287/mksc.1120.0705.
Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.
Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1986a). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 822–841.
Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1986b). Product compatibility choice in a market with technological progress. Oxford Economic Papers, 38(0), 146–165.
Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1992). Product introduction and network externalities. Journal of Indus- trial Economics, 40(1), 55–83.
Madureira, A., den Hartog, F., Bouwman, H., Baken, N. (2013). Empirical validation of Metcalfe’s law: how Internet usage patterns have changed over time. Information Economics Policy, 25(4), 246–256. doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.07.002.
Matutes, C., & Padilla, A.J. (1994). Shared ATM networks and banking competition. European Economic Review, 38(6), 113–1138.
Metcalfe, B. (2013). Metcalfe’s law after 40 years of ethernet. Computer, 46(12), 26–31. doi:10.1109/MC.2013.374.
Odlyzko, A., & Tilly, B. (2005). A refutation of Metcalfe’s law and a better estimate for the value of networks and network interconnections, mimeo. Digital Technology Center, University of Minnesota. http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/metcalfe.pdf.
Xie, J., & Sirbu, M.M. (1995). Price competition and compatibility in the presence of positive demand externalities. Management Science, 41(5), 909–926.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Hove, L. Metcalfe’s law: not so wrong after all. Netnomics 15, 1–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-014-9084-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-014-9084-1