Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Briscoe et al. IEEE Spectrum, 43(7), 34–39 (2006) claim that Metcalfe’s law is “wrong”. One of their arguments is that “if Metcalfe’s Law were true, then two networks ought to interconnect regardless of their relative sizes”. This paper shows that this argument is flawed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Briscoe, B., Odlyzko, A., Tilly, B. (2006). Metcalfe’s law is wrong. IEEE Spectrum, 43(7), 34–39. http://spectrum.ieee.org/jul06/4109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Briscoe, B., Odlyzko, A., Tilly, B. (2010). When a “law” isn’t a law at all. International Commerce Review, 8(2), 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Economides, N. (1991). Compatibility and the creation of shared networks. In: Guerin-Calvert, M., & Wildman, S. (Eds.) In Electronic services networks: A business and public policy challenge. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esser, P., & Leruth, L. (1988). Marketing compatible, yet differentiated products: in search of competitive equilibria when network externalities are at work. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5(4), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1986). Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. American Economic Review, 76(5), 940–955.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Dynamic competition with switching costs. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(1), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuentelsaz, L., Garrido, E., Maicas, J.P. (2012). A strategic approach to network value in network industries. Forthcoming in Journal of Management. Published online 31 May 2012. doi:10.1177/0149206312448399.

  8. He, T., Kuksov, D., Narasimhan, C. (2012). Intraconnectivity and interconnectivity: when value creation may reduce profits. Marketing Science, 31(4), 587–602. doi:10.1287/mksc.1120.0705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1986a). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 822–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1986b). Product compatibility choice in a market with technological progress. Oxford Economic Papers, 38(0), 146–165.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1992). Product introduction and network externalities. Journal of Indus- trial Economics, 40(1), 55–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Madureira, A., den Hartog, F., Bouwman, H., Baken, N. (2013). Empirical validation of Metcalfe’s law: how Internet usage patterns have changed over time. Information Economics Policy, 25(4), 246–256. doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matutes, C., & Padilla, A.J. (1994). Shared ATM networks and banking competition. European Economic Review, 38(6), 113–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Metcalfe, B. (2013). Metcalfe’s law after 40 years of ethernet. Computer, 46(12), 26–31. doi:10.1109/MC.2013.374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Odlyzko, A., & Tilly, B. (2005). A refutation of Metcalfe’s law and a better estimate for the value of networks and network interconnections, mimeo. Digital Technology Center, University of Minnesota. http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/metcalfe.pdf.

  17. Xie, J., & Sirbu, M.M. (1995). Price competition and compatibility in the presence of positive demand externalities. Management Science, 41(5), 909–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo Van Hove.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Hove, L. Metcalfe’s law: not so wrong after all. Netnomics 15, 1–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-014-9084-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-014-9084-1

Keywords

Navigation