Date: 12 Apr 2013
Is the Right Anterior Temporal Variant of Prosopagnosia a Form of ‘Associative Prosopagnosia’ or a Form of ‘Multimodal Person Recognition Disorder’?
- Guido Gainotti
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The construct of associative prosopagnosia is strongly debated for two main reasons. The first is that, according to some authors, even patients with putative forms of associative visual agnosia necessarily present perceptual defects, that are the cause of their recognition impairment. The second is that in patients with right anterior temporal lobe (ATL) lesions (and sparing of the occipital and fusiform face areas), who can present a defect of familiar people recognition, with normal results on tests of face perception, the disorder is often multimodal, affecting voices (and to a lesser extent names) in addition to faces. The present review was prompted by the claim, recently advanced by some authors, that face recognition disorders observed in patients with right ATL lesions should be considered as an associative or amnestic form of prosopagnosia, because in them both face perception and retrieval of personal semantic knowledge from name are spared. In order to check this claim, we surveyed all the cases of patients who satisfied the criteria of associative prosopagnosia reported in the literature, to see if their defect was circumscribed to the visual modality or also affected other channels of people recognition. The review showed that in most patients the study had been limited to the visual modality, but that, when the other modalities of people recognition had been taken into account, the defect was often multimodal, affecting voice (and to a lesser extent name) in addition to face.
Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular systems and dysphasia. In S. K. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 32–60). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Assal, G. (1969). Regression of physiognomy recognition disorders and topographic memory disorders in a patient operated on for intracerebral, right parieto-temporal hematoma. Revue Neurologique (Paris), 121(2), 184–185.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.PubMed
Benton, A. L., & Van Allen, M. W. (1968). Impairment of facial recognition in patients with cerebral disease. Cortex, 4, 344–358.CrossRef
Benton, A. L., & Van Allen, M. W. (1972). Prosopagnosia and facial discrimination. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 15(2), 167–172.CrossRef
Blank, H., Anwander, A., & von Kriegstein, K. (2011). Direct structural connections between voice- and face-recognition areas. Journal of Neurosciences, 31(36), 12906–12915.
Bodamer, J. (1947). Die prosopoagnosic. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 179(1–2), 6–53.CrossRef
Boudouresques, J., Poncet, M., Cherif, A. A., & Balzamo, M. (1979). Agnosia for faces: evidence of functional disorganization of a certain type of recognition of objects in the physical world. Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine, 163(7), 695–702.PubMed
Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: a model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1–31.CrossRef
Caramazza, A., Hillis, A., Rapp, B. C., & Romani, C. (1990). The multiple semantic hypothesis: multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 161–189.CrossRef
Damasio, A. R. (1990). Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge. Trends in Neuroscience, 13, 95–98.CrossRef
De Renzi, E. (1986). Current issues in prosopagnosia. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 243–252). Dordrecht: Martinus Nisoff.CrossRef
Esiri, M. M. (1982). Herpes simplex encephalitis. An immunohistological study of the distribution of viral antigen within the brain. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 54(2), 209–226.CrossRef
Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gainotti, G., & Marra, C. (2011). Differential contribution of right and left temporo-occipital and anterior temporal lesions to face recognition disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(55), 1–11. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00055.
Gentileschi, V., Sperber, S., & Spinnler, H. (1999). Progressive defective recognition of familiar people. Neurocase, 5, 407–424.CrossRef
Gentileschi, V., Sperber, S., & Spinnler, H. (2001). Crossmodal agnosia for familiar people as a consequence of right infero-polar temporal atrophy. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 439–463.PubMed
Hanley, J. R., Young, A. W., & Pearson, N. A. (1989). Defective recognition of familiar people. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 179–210.CrossRef
Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1988). On the case for multiple semantic systems - a reply. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 143–150.CrossRef
Lhermitte, F., & Pillon, B. (1975). Prosopagnosia. Role of the right hemisphere in visual perception. (Apropos of a case after right occipital lobectomy). Revue Neurologique (Paris), 131(11), 791–812.
Lissauer, H. (1890). Ein fall von seelenblindheit nebst einem beitrag zur theorie derselben. Archives fur Psychiatrie, 21, 222–270.CrossRef
Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(54) doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054.
McNeil, J. E., & Warrington, E. K. (1991). Prosopagnosia: a reclassification. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, 43(2), 267–287.
Nakachi, R., Muramatsu, T., Kato, M., Akiyama, T., Saito, F., Yoshino, F., et al. (2007). Progressive prosopagnosia at the very early stage of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Psychogeriatrics, 7, 155–162.CrossRef
Pancaroglu, R., Busigny, T., Johnston, S., Sekunova, A., Duchaine, B., Barton, J.J. (2011). The right anterior temporal lobe variant of prosopagnosia. Journal of Vision, vol.1 no. 11, article 573.
Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). Semantic dementia: One window on the structure and organisation of semantic memory. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, vol. 2 (2nd ed., pp. 313–333). North Holland: Elsevier.
Phylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells to the mind’s brain: a critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.CrossRef
Schweich, M., & Bruyer, R. (1993). Heterogeneity in the cognition manifestations of prosopagnosia: the study of a group of single cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 529–547.CrossRef
Sergent, J., & Poncet, M. (1988). Patterns of perceptual deficits in 2 prosopagnosic patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 50.
Tzavaras, T., Merienne, L., & Masure, M. C. (1973). Prosopagnosie, amnésie et troubles du langage par lésion temporale gauche chez un sujet gaucher. Encephale, 62, 382–394.PubMed
von Kriegstein, K., Kleinschmidt, A., Sterzer, P., & Giraud, A. L. (2005). Interaction of face and voice areas during speaker recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 367–376.CrossRef
- Is the Right Anterior Temporal Variant of Prosopagnosia a Form of ‘Associative Prosopagnosia’ or a Form of ‘Multimodal Person Recognition Disorder’?
Volume 23, Issue 2 , pp 99-110
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Associative prosopagnosia
- Multimodal person recognition disorder
- Right anterior temporal lesions
- Face familiarity feelings
- Familiar people identification
- Industry Sectors
- Guido Gainotti (1) (2) (3)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Neuropsychological Research and Department of Neurosciences, Università Cattolica of Rome, Rome, Italy
- 2. Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
- 3. Center for Neuropsychological Research, Institute of Neurology, Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University of Rome, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy