Abstract
In his book Le roi-machine, Jean-Marie Apostolidès describes Louis XIV as the principal director of his own spectacle at Versailles. Alongside this micromanaged world, the petite société represents another permanent space of representation which escapes the court’s watchful eye. The Voyage de campagne by the Comtesse de Murat highlights the adventures of a group of six aristocrats who spend two months in the Comte de Sélincourt’s country château entertaining one other. We shall examine the metatheatrical aspects of this dramatic space, in which the characters, aware of their own role-playing, continually perform, becoming spectacles of one another. Colored with theatrical rhetoric, the characters’ language is seen as a symptom of the intermediate space. A closer look brings the insubordinate aspect of this “prise du pouvoir” to light. Far from the constrictive domain of the capital, the characters improvise their own spectacular world which at times spills into the realm of the supernatural, in direct opposition to the constraints of aesthetic codes. I will argue that the subversive nature of their otherworldly existence is in reaction to the controlled rational literary space of the capitol. It is through their own embracement of the irrational that these six romantic sojourners are able to escape, for a short time, the tragic puppeteered space of the roi-machine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allaire, É. (1970). La Bruyère dans la maison de CondÉ (Vol. 1, pp. 482–483). Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.
Apostolidès, J.-M. (1981). Le roi-machine. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
Aristotle. (1996). Poetics. London: Penguin books.
Borie, M. (1997). Le fantôme ou, le théâtre qui doute. Paris: Actes Sud.
Brenner, C. D. (1977). The French dramatic proverb. Diss. Berkeley.
Cromer, S. (1984). Édition du Journal pour Mademoiselle de Menou, d’après le Manuscrit 3471 de la Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal: Ouvrages de Mme la Comtesse de Murat. Diss, UniversitÉ de la Sorbonne.
De Murat, C. (1697). Mémoires de la Comtesse de M*** avant sa retraite, ou la Défense des dames. Paris: Veuve de Claude Barbin.
De Murat, C. (1699). Voyage de campagne. Paris: Veuve de Claude Barbin.
Delaporte, V. (1968). Du merveilleux dans la littérature française sous le règne de Louis XIV. Geneva: Slatkine reprints.
Flœck, W. (1989). Esthétique de la diversité: Pour une histoire du baroque littéraire en France. Tübingen: Papers on French Seventeeth-Century Literature.
Forestier, G. (1981). Le théâtre dans le théâtre: Sur la scène française au XVIIe siècle. Geneva: Droz.
Harth, E. (1992). Cartesian women: Versions and subversions of rational discourse in the old regime. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
King, J. (1949). Science and rationalism in the government of Louis XIV. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
La Fontaine. (1964). Fables. Paris: M. Didier.
Lopez, D. (2006). Le Théâtre à l’Hôtel de Rambouillet. Papers on French Seventeenth Century Literature, 33.64, 239–268.
Lyons, J. D. (1999). Kingdom of disorder: The theory of tragedy in Classical France. Purdue University Press.
Patard, G. (2006). Madame de Murat: Contes. Paris: Champion.
Perrault, C. (1971). Parallèle des anciens et des modernes 1692, (Vol. 3.) Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.
Rivara, A. (2003). Deux conceptions de la temporalité et de l’Histoire, Le Voyage de campagne de Mme de Murat (1699) et Les Mémoires de d’Artagnan par Courtilz de Sandras (1700). L’Année 1700. Aurélia Gaillard et al. (Ed.). Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 91–109.
Scholem, G. (1987). Kabbalah. New York: Dorset Press.
Valincour. (1972). Lettres à Madame la Marquise *** sur le sujet de la Princesse de Clèves. 1678. Tours: Université François Rabelais.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennedy, T.V. Metatheatricality and Subversion in the Comtesse de Murat’s Voyage de campagne . Neophilologus 94, 557–567 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-009-9195-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-009-9195-3