Skip to main content
Log in

Metatheatricality and Subversion in the Comtesse de Murat’s Voyage de campagne

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his book Le roi-machine, Jean-Marie Apostolidès describes Louis XIV as the principal director of his own spectacle at Versailles. Alongside this micromanaged world, the petite société represents another permanent space of representation which escapes the court’s watchful eye. The Voyage de campagne by the Comtesse de Murat highlights the adventures of a group of six aristocrats who spend two months in the Comte de Sélincourt’s country château entertaining one other. We shall examine the metatheatrical aspects of this dramatic space, in which the characters, aware of their own role-playing, continually perform, becoming spectacles of one another. Colored with theatrical rhetoric, the characters’ language is seen as a symptom of the intermediate space. A closer look brings the insubordinate aspect of this “prise du pouvoir” to light. Far from the constrictive domain of the capital, the characters improvise their own spectacular world which at times spills into the realm of the supernatural, in direct opposition to the constraints of aesthetic codes. I will argue that the subversive nature of their otherworldly existence is in reaction to the controlled rational literary space of the capitol. It is through their own embracement of the irrational that these six romantic sojourners are able to escape, for a short time, the tragic puppeteered space of the roi-machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allaire, É. (1970). La Bruyère dans la maison de CondÉ (Vol. 1, pp. 482–483). Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostolidès, J.-M. (1981). Le roi-machine. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1996). Poetics. London: Penguin books.

  • Borie, M. (1997). Le fantôme ou, le théâtre qui doute. Paris: Actes Sud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, C. D. (1977). The French dramatic proverb. Diss. Berkeley.

  • Cromer, S. (1984). Édition du Journal pour Mademoiselle de Menou, d’après le Manuscrit 3471 de la Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal: Ouvrages de Mme la Comtesse de Murat. Diss, UniversitÉ de la Sorbonne.

  • De Murat, C. (1697). Mémoires de la Comtesse de M*** avant sa retraite, ou la Défense des dames. Paris: Veuve de Claude Barbin.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Murat, C. (1699). Voyage de campagne. Paris: Veuve de Claude Barbin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaporte, V. (1968). Du merveilleux dans la littérature française sous le règne de Louis XIV. Geneva: Slatkine reprints.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flœck, W. (1989). Esthétique de la diversité: Pour une histoire du baroque littéraire en France. Tübingen: Papers on French Seventeeth-Century Literature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestier, G. (1981). Le théâtre dans le théâtre: Sur la scène française au XVIIe siècle. Geneva: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harth, E. (1992). Cartesian women: Versions and subversions of rational discourse in the old regime. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. (1949). Science and rationalism in the government of Louis XIV. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Fontaine. (1964). Fables. Paris: M. Didier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, D. (2006). Le Théâtre à l’Hôtel de Rambouillet. Papers on French Seventeenth Century Literature, 33.64, 239–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. D. (1999). Kingdom of disorder: The theory of tragedy in Classical France. Purdue University Press.

  • Patard, G. (2006). Madame de Murat: Contes. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrault, C. (1971). Parallèle des anciens et des modernes 1692, (Vol. 3.) Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.

  • Rivara, A. (2003). Deux conceptions de la temporalité et de l’Histoire, Le Voyage de campagne de Mme de Murat (1699) et Les Mémoires de d’Artagnan par Courtilz de Sandras (1700). L’Année 1700. Aurélia Gaillard et al. (Ed.). Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 91–109.

  • Scholem, G. (1987). Kabbalah. New York: Dorset Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valincour. (1972). Lettres à Madame la Marquise *** sur le sujet de la Princesse de Clèves. 1678. Tours: Université François Rabelais.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa V. Kennedy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, T.V. Metatheatricality and Subversion in the Comtesse de Murat’s Voyage de campagne . Neophilologus 94, 557–567 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-009-9195-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-009-9195-3

Keywords

Navigation