Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bevacizumab (BEV, Avastin®) produces durable objective radiological responses of 20–26 %, median response durations of 16–18 weeks, and median overall survival (mOS) of 31–40 weeks. While the use of BEV is well-established, the lack of dose–response studies in glioblastoma (GBM) patients raises the question whether current dosing practice is optimal. As a result of differing approaches to BEV dosing that ranged from the FDA approved package insert dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks to 7.5 mg/kg every 3–4 weeks, among physicians within Northern California Kaiser Permanente hospitals over 4+ years, we did an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of patients seen in Northern California Kaiser Permanente facilities and treated with BEV. Between September 1, 2008 and August 31, 2013, 181 patients received BEV for tumor progression/recurrence starting 2.6 weeks after completion of chemoradiation. The integrated BEV administered dose-week (AUCBEV) for all patients had a median AUCBEV of 3.6 mg·wk/kg). Maximum likelihood analysis found patients over 65 years did worse than younger patients (p = 0.004), women lived longer (p = 0.002), and patients treated below the AUCBEV did better than those treated above the median AUCBEV (p = 0.003). mOS for BEV starting 1 month after chemoradiation was 45 versus 68 weeks (p = 0.012) and BEV starting 3 months after chemoradiation was 40 versus 74 weeks (p = 0.0085). Dosing BEV at half the standard dose for progressive/recurrent GBM was at least equivalent to or, maybe better than standard dosing. Unexplained was the observation that females had longer OS with BEV than males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(28):4733–4740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen MH, Shen YL, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2009) FDA drug approval summary: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) as treatment of recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. Oncologist 14(11):1131–1138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Desjardins A, Reardon DA, Herndon JE II et al (2008) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent WHO grade 3 malignant gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 14(21):7068–7073

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K et al (2009) Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(5):740–745

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez J, Kumar AJ, Conrad CA, Levin VA (2007) Effect of bevacizumab on radiation necrosis of the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(2):323–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levin VA, Bidaut L, Hou P et al (2011) Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab therapy for radiation necrosis of the central nervous system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(5):1487–1495

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong ET, Huberman M, Lu XQ, Mahadevan A (2008) Bevacizumab Reverses Cerebral Radiation Necrosis. J Clin Oncol 26:5649–5650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu AK, Macy ME, Foreman NK (2009) Bevacizumab as therapy for radiation necrosis in four children with pontine gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(4):1148–1154

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Torcuator R, Zuniga R, Mohan YS et al (2009) Initial experience with bevacizumab treatment for biopsy confirmed cerebral radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 94(1):63–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lubelski D, Abdullah K, Weil R, Marko N (2013) Bevacizumab for radiation necrosis following treatment of high grade glioma: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurooncol 115(3):317–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu JF, Bruno R, Eppler S, Novotny W, Lum B, Gaudreault J (2008) Clinical pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62(5):779–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wick W, Weller M, van den Bent M, Stupp R (2010) Bevacizumab and recurrent malignant gliomas: a European perspective. J Clin Oncol. 28(12):e188–e189 (author reply e190-182)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Levin VA, Edwards MS, Wright DC et al (1980) Modified procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV 3) combination chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Cancer Treat Rep 64(2–3):237–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimates from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50(3):163–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gehan EA (1965) A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 52:203–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffman WF, Levin VA, Wilson CB (1979) Evaluation of malignant glioma patients during the postirradiation period. J Neurosurg 50(5):624–628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Spagnolli F et al (2008) Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncol. 10(3):361–367

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ (2008) Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 9(5):453–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chamberlain MC (2008) Pseudoprogression in glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 26(26):4359 author reply 4359–4360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brandsma D, van den Bent MJ (2009) Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol 22(6):633–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaskis C, Neyns B, Michotte A, de Ridder M, Everaert H (2009) Pseudoprogression after radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for high-grade glioma: clinical observations and working recommendations. Surg Neurol 72(4):423–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Clarke JL, Chang S (2009) Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: challenges in brain tumor imaging. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 9(3):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM et al (2014) Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(9):943–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Piccioni DE, Selfridge J, Mody RR et al (2014) Deferred use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is not associated with diminished efficacy. Neuro Oncol 16(6):815–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Raizer JJ, Grimm S, Chamberlain MC et al (2010) A phase 2 trial of single-agent bevacizumab given in an every-3-week schedule for patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. Cancer 116(22):5297–5305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong ET, Gautam S, Malchow C, Lun M, Pan E, Brem S (2011) Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 9(4):403–407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez MA, DeJesus AY, Cheng L (2014) Use of chemotherapy within the last 14 days of life in patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. JAMA Intern Med 174(6):989–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Internal Kaiser Permanente funding.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor A. Levin.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levin, V.A., Mendelssohn, N.D., Chan, J. et al. Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 122, 145–150 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1693-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1693-x

Keywords

Navigation